Jump to content

User talk:NoobThreePointOh/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Why are you deleting a cited source with information on it?

I just recently made an appropriate change to the CATP article based on new information that’s been gathered about the instrumentation on there. The information is correct and there’s at least 4 sessionographers who did all sorts of research to find out that information. Please explain your edits before you make them because I spent an hour trying to find all that information from them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:147:4701:2330:0:0:0:7934 (talk) 11:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

What the heck sashashs 2620:98:2000:2064:D0C1:550F:3BDA:E33D (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
It's not constructive man. It disrupts readers from seeing the proper sentence. That's why I reverted it. Next time you perform an edit like this, think again whether it's constructive or not. Sahas P. (talk) 19:09, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Its personal now King von55 (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited U.S. Route 421 in Indiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Time. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mountain Time Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culberson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
My watchlist today is full of vandal edits that are almost immediately reverted by you. Thanks for your work! Schazjmd (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

No problem. I work around the clock to revert vandalism and act like a human Cluebot NG. Sahas P. (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

—Femke 🐦 (talk) 15:04, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

I think I try to know that the slogan Forever was used in all Barangay FM stations nationwide. I made this correction because as of now, Forever was the slogan for Barangay RT. 2001:4454:384:8400:25D3:12F4:CC20:86B9 (talk) 03:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Oh, alright, thanks for letting me know. Sahas P. (talk) 03:19, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Scorpion King

...did you look at the section removed or the edit comment I left? Why did you reinstate fake garbage?71.32.166.234 (talk) 21:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indiana State Road 120, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Van Buren Township, Indiana, Greenfield Township, Indiana and York Township, Indiana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Less is more

Please consolidate your edits or at least use summaries on most if not all of them. The log at US 30 is filled with your map tests; next time, try it in a sandbox and make sure it works before pushing it to a live article. SounderBruce 19:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Patti Lupone

I keep having information that is accurately sourced removed from Patti LuPones career. The information is accurate, it’s being removed by racists 82.26.220.254 (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

State Route 395 "becomes"

I would like to attach the last portion of the talk page for State route 395 for your reference. It was the last thing to be established and nobody had any objections. If you dislike the word "becomes" so, so, much, please continue the conversation on the talk page. I have not reverted your last edit to avoid edit warring, however I wish to do so as soon as possible. And BC 395 not being a connecter highway is an opinion that I do not agree with.

I think this discussion has gotten accidentally and unnecessarily polarized. Some people seem to have thought that you were proposing a merged article. But really all you are proposing is minor variations in the wording used to describe the relationship between them. If it's only that, it needn't be so contentious, and there's room to find a good compromise, instead of thinking of it as all or nothing.
And the current wording, "becomes" seems like a great compromise to me. Is there anyone who has a problem with that wording? If so, what is wrong with it? And do you, Zacharycmango, have other hopes for further improvements that you want to build consensus for or get help with? Ccrrccrr (talk) 21:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Ccrrccrr for clearing things up. Wording variations was indeed what I intended. I did not have the immediate intention to merge the two articles, although I'll admit that I think it's a good idea to consider in the future. I am happy with the current word "becomes." What I hope for is that when the terminus of the highway is mentioned, the article mentions that the road continues across the border for 2 miles to connect to BC Highway 3 right across the border. Currently, in some spots, the article is phrased to sound like the terminus is either a dead end or a connection to another full-fledged highway. Zacharycmango (talk) 00:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Zacharycmango (talk) 02:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Redirects

Regarding this edit, and others like it, you really don't and shouldn't do that. Per WP:NOTBROKEN, we normally wouldn't edit an article just to bypass redirects. In fact, that page says we shouldn't fix most redirect links in articles anyway. If you're doing other editing and happen to make tweaks like that, it's one thing, but to only make that change just clutters up watchlists for other editors with little benefit. Imzadi 1979 → 18:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Ah, ok, I never knew that. Thanks for letting me know. Sahas P. (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for helping fix the vandalism on 2023 NFL Season. Dinoz1 (chat?) 15:45, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

No prob. Sahas P. (talk) 15:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Study Invitation

Hey @Sahas P., thanks for patrolling edits and reverting vandalism! I wonder if you are interested in our ongoing study for patrollers. The study aims to evaluate AI models that power Huggle, SWViewer, and many other anti-vandal tools. Your feedback can be really helpful! If you're interested, please check out our recruitment page for more information. Thank you for your consideration! Tzusheng (talk) 19:16, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Sure! I will definitely look at it when I get my chance. Sahas P. (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
@Sahas P. Thanks for your consideration! We'll be starting the study in the next one or two days. I am more than happy to answer any questions if that helps! Tzusheng (talk) 19:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
@Sahas P. And yes, we can definitely do a text-based session! Please see my email for more details. Thanks! Tzusheng (talk) 03:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 30 in Wyoming (June 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sahas P.! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Air Moldova

Just wondering why my edits were reverted? They were not a test. Moldova did not exist before independence from the Soviet Union. It was the Moldavian SSR. 88.107.188.199 (talk) 17:26, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Well, they seemed like a test. I wasn't sure because I had never heard of a word called Moldavian. I've only heard of Moldovan. If I made a mistake, you can make it Moldavian again. Just be sure to add sources if you can, that's all. Sahas P. (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 30 in Wyoming has been accepted

U.S. Route 30 in Wyoming, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:01, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Elie Habib

This content as written by myself and one of the thief robbed my content and hired someone to publish the article. I can also share the evidences 182.185.94.102 (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Elie Habib

I admire your active watch and protection to the page from irresponsible editors! Thanks a lot! Eyoab (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

No problem. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Amber

The lawsuit against the Canadian Ball Hockey Association forced their name change to Canada Ball Hockey and they lost their privilege of being the sole representative for Canada which was always shared between the Canadian Ball Hockey Association and the National Ball Hockey Association.

The Canadian Ball Hockey Association does not exist anymore. Hence the update. 205.193.112.245 (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive sign up

Hello! I noticed that you are signed up for the October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive. However, you're going to be unable to participate if you do not have the New Page Reviewer permission. If you are still interested in participating in the backlog drive, then I encourage you to request the permission at WP:PERM/NPR. I have, for the moment, removed you from the participants list as you not able to participate at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Right. Honestly, I can't do it, because I've only created one page. Thanks for removing me anyways. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi NoobThreePointOh. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

  • Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
  • Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I had requested the rollback rights two times last year, and I never got them. Thank you for accepting it! Cheers! NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Steve Farley

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hi NoobThreePointOh,

Thanks for patrolling recent changes. Regarding Special:Diff/1179489186, unless there are more reliable sources you had already been aware of, this is a pretty risky approach to take:

  • "This isn't false" is an edit summary I'd avoid even if the information is verifiable, as it goes beyond referring to the sources. You are legally responsible for your contributions and some living people are litigious. As you know, Wikipedia as a tertiary source just summarizes other, mostly secondary sources (WP:PSTS) – so let's just focus on that instead of making own judgements especially in places where you can't edit them afterwards.
  • 27 seconds are unlikely to be sufficient to reach a conclusion strong enough to overcome WP:BLPRESTORE.
  • There is usually no harm in keeping a statement removed for a few minutes, hours, days or even weeks until a consensus has been found, until the situation is clearer, until the sources have been checked, ...

From what I can see, the restored statement is not supported by its source, so I have removed it for now.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:27, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Ok. I just wasn't sure if it was false or not, but at least you informed me of it. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Andrawes

Ah, i see - you LOVE Editwars. Well well wellll. Andrawes IS a convicted TERRORIST, because she was SENTENCED by a german court for TERRORISM. Stick your whitewashing elsewhere. 2003:DC:F71C:9F00:1846:F06C:507E:6C3D (talk) 22:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Lol someone doesn't even know what edit warring is. Also, saying that I'm whitewashing is just a personal attack. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Aha. "Lol. Someone doesn´t even know what edit warring is" is not a personal attack? You holier than me? Stop whitewashing terrorist c*nts. Verdict OLG Hamburg added, and now shut up. 2003:DC:F741:AF00:A891:895D:D18F:1FA6 (talk) 10:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Now THIS is a definite personal attack. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Also, I only reverted your edit once. How can that be an edit war? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:33, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi NoobThreePointOh! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:46, Friday, October 20, 2023 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Interstate 29 in North Dakota

What footnotes? Only the exit list section and the mileage number are sourced. Everything else is unsourced. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 20:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

About U.S. Route 12 in South Dakota

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give U.S. Route 12 in South Dakota a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:U.S. Route 12 in South Dakota. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 22:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979 Yeah. Sorry. I'm not familiar with the "Move" feature because I've never used it. Now that you've mentioned it to me, I'll not be as hasty next time. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

"Banned user" tag

Hi NoobThreePointOh. I noticed these edits of yours and was wondering what ban you were referring to? I can see that the user is blocked, but I couldn't find any indication that they are also banned. Thanks, --Blablubbs (talk) 22:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

@Blablubbs So, if you go back to the September archive of the user's talk page, User:Canterbury Tail found out the user had been sockpuppeting through IPs, like this one, this one, and finally this one. He said the user had sockpuppeted enough times that they were banned under the WP:3STRIKES policy. If you think I made a mistake, then that's okay. I admit my fault. Cheers. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Okay, just for clarification I said they're "effectively banned", not they're banned. I know it's subtle, but for them to be actually banned the sockpuppetry has to be proven through checkuser and the community needs to agree on it. So they're technically not banned, but if they socked enough more to become a real problem it would be a simple thing to get the check and ban. Canterbury Tail talk 11:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
@Canterbury Tail Oh well. I guess that was all my fault then. Thanks for letting me know. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Y'know, despite me being on here for at least 2.5 years, I still have a lot to learn. The banning policy was something new that I hadn't known about, and now I do. If I keep doing something incorrectly, then I definitely know it's something new I'm about to realize. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 12:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
We tend to learn more from our mistakes than our successes, and we all learn something every day. No harm no foul. Canterbury Tail talk 15:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
I agree. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:55, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Dobos torta!

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

194.230.77.140 (talk) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.

To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

194.230.77.140 (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

A Shiny Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Given as thanks for actively fighting the scourge of vandalism. MeadeIndeed (talk) 16:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CSD G5s

Hello, whenever you tag a page for speedy deletion for being the work of a block-evading editor, please put the name of the sockmaster in the field on Twinkle, not the sockpuppet. Admins reviewing the tagged article will want to check out the SPI report which will be filed under the username of the sockmaster, not the most recent sockpuppet. Thank you for your help. Liz Read! Talk! 18:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. Thanks for letting me know. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
No problem. CSD G5s are tricky. You have to see when the sockmaster was blocked, when the article was created, they are more complicated than articles tagged for other criteria.
But I just noticed that you draftified Etearchus, saying it had no sources. Or at least, that is the standard edit summary provided by the editing tool. But there was a source and now additional sources. They are books, so they aren't online, but they still count. Thanks! Keep up the good work. Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks again. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

CSDs

Hello NoobThreePointOh -- I've declined your A7 on Hydel University because educational institutions are exempt from A7. Also, I noticed you incorrectly tagged a couple of drafts with G1 as nonsense. They're certainly not useful, and I've deleted them as promotional (promoting an idea), but there is no way they could count as nonsense. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Oop. Sorry. My bad. I've really wanted to try and become an Articles For Creation reviewer (not for hat collecting), and I don't have any accepts or declines yet. I'm not trying to ask you for the right to become a participant, but if I really did get the permission, it would most certainly make my job of reviewing articles easier. Anyways, I hope you might read this soon. Cheers. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:30, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
I don't work on AfC these days, nor do I generally work on permissions; however I think your tagging is a little scattergun as yet, so I wouldn't recommend requesting any related permissions until you get more of an understanding of how notability/deletion works and the ins and outs of the various subject-specific and general notability guidelines. Looking at your recent edits, the A1 on Journal of Diabetes was applied far too soon after creation (you are supposed to wait around an hour to allow the creator time to finish their initial edits), and was in any case wrong as the context is immediately clear. I know this relates to NPP not AfC, but the two areas are very similar in the skills required.
By the way, Liz has just called me on deleting the two scam drafts under G11, so the learning curve never ends... Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Ok. That all makes sense. Thanks for the info. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 01:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Page Review!

Hi dear NoobThreePointOh, As you suggested i have removed the IMDb link.

So you can please Accepted this submission - Draft:VJ Sunny.

Thankyou! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I will take a look at it. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Done with the changes suggested by you for the Article Draft:VJ Sunny
Please look into it ! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 16:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Page draft for Nigerian Fulfulde

The sources i cited for the Nigerian Fulfulde draft are reliable and support what i said, how are they unreliable?. 2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:DDF1:72AB:7BC7:E9F8 (talk) 14:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

It's not the sources themselves that are unreliable, they have an inline cite error. That means you didn't cite them properly, causing the code to become red and messed up. That needs to be fixed. Another thing is that there's no history section, no section saying how the thing is important, etc. You need to add those as well. It's not going to be reliable without these types of sections, as they are the key ingredients for an article. For the inline cite error, see this: Help:Referencing for beginners#Inline citations NoobThreePointOh (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
What about Borgu Fulfulde draft? What's wrong with that?. 2600:1700:2F01:CDC0:DDF1:72AB:7BC7:E9F8 (talk) 14:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Same thing. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Same thing... except there's no inline cite error. There's no history section or anything else. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Page Review!

Dear @NoobThreePointOh, Requesting you to please Review this page Draft:Dwaraka Creations Thankyou! Mr.shaikmeer (talk) 17:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Please do not continue to ask me. Remember what I said: you can request assistance at the Teahouse or at Wikipedia:Wikiproject Articles for creation/Help desk. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Grae Cleugh

Dear @NoobThreePointOh You declined Draft:Grae Cleugh. Before I resubmit can you explain why?

Your justifiacation is incorrect use of a template.

If you can't publish the article practically every article on Wikipedia needs deleted. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 17:24, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

I declined the draft because this person is not notable, and that some sources are self-published (that is, written in a way that another person wrote a biography, etc.). Another thing is that there's no history, how important this person is, and more. There needs to be verifiable, reliable sources. There are other people that can also help you on the Teahouse if you require assistance. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi noob
I added the less reliable doolee reference as it verifies the facts on his publisher Bloomsbury's website. I disagree that his publishers website is not a valid source. I added a review for context, and added the reference from 2002 Laurence Olivier Awards.
Im going to add the second reference from 2002 Laurence Olivier Awards, and a review from the national press.
Could you take a look and resubmit it? 86.167.216.44 (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Sources are not enough. There's no history section, a section of importance, or anything that can be used to confirm he is notable. Not only that, but it has already been discussed that the article is not suitable to be published. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
It meets the minimum requirements of not being notable for a single event and reliable sources. History is not relevent to a BLP, just the facts. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 18:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
You keep saying he is not notable, but the facts and the references cannot be ignord. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 18:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
So you are saying references are not a valid inclusion criteria. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 18:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
and in the same breath that history is required. If you want history check the see also section or external sources. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
See also is not enough. An actual history section is required to explain how this person you wrote about came to prominence. After this, please do not keep asking me to check the draft, as I have said that there are other editors who can help. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Ok. Point taken.
I renamed education to history, which mentions his training but actually explains how he came to prominence in detail. Recent work is linked to externally. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 19:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
And resubmitted. 86.167.216.44 (talk) 19:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Since I'm busy right now, I assume that someone else will review it for you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:07, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

help me get a declined post published

Hi, I‘ve been working to get a post published about a band that has had multiple dedicated features on a leading US news outlet, ranked the number one album of the year by a leading public radio station in the US, and been interviewed by Grammy. I’m not sure what else would qualify here for justification for a wiki page. Can you pls help?

Thank you! Josh Georges1K (talk) 02:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Can you post the link to your declined submission? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 02:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Request on 05:10:45, 13 December 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Georges1K


Hello,

Thanks for taking the time to review these entries. I created a draft wiki page on the band Say She She because it seems to me there are clear signs of notability, that meet Wikipedia's definition. Below is my rationale. If you still believe it does not qualify, I would be open to feedback on how to improve the entry.

Thanks, GM

+++

Below is support for specific criteria from the guidelines for notability (music).

Multiple, non-trivial secondary sources

Two separate features on CBS Saturday Morning TV broadcast, one of a performance, the other of an 8-minute interview interview lasting 8 minutes.

Also

---/ a dedicated 30 minutes segment on npr's world cafe, including an interview (will add in the piece)

---/ an interview with Grammy.com, the same organization recognized by as the most prestigious and significant awards in the music industry worldwide.

Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network.

As mentioned above, the band both performed live and had a dedicated 8 minute interview on CBS Saturday Morning, the morning program of one of America's major broadcast networks.

Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.

The band has been in heavy rotation by public radio, as indicated by their latest album's pick for album of the year by KCRW, recognized by the NYTimes as one of three public radio tastemakers.

Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).

The band has released two albums within the Colemine Records group of labels, which includes other bands with Wiki pages, such as Grammy-nominated Black Pumas, a motion soundtrack from members of the Budos Band, and Durand Jones & the Indications.

---END---

Georges1K (talk) 05:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

One thing to note: There needs to be a history section as well as a section where these people came to prominence. These two things are some of the most crucial aspects to writing an article. If you still don't know what to do, you can also ask other editors at the Teahouse or Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:18, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks ! Will include that and resubmit Georges1K (talk) 12:30, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Fixed Citation in Draft:Uman

Hi I fixed the issue with the citation would that be enough to get the page published ? Nabil vega (talk) 05:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

I would recommend also asking other editors at the Teahouse or Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Request on 10:25:48, 13 December 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Kitamhal



Kitamhal (talk) 10:25, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

@Kitamhal It's declined because:
  1. The citing of your references have been done incorrectly (I couldn't put that, but it is a reason).
  2. There's no background, no history, nothing that explains the importance of the person you wrote about.
  3. I looked over it before you edited and saw you used Instagram and parts of Wikipedia itself as sources. Instagram is social media and cannot be used, and Wikipedia is being edited by at least a million users every day. Obviously Wikipedia isn't a "reliable source" either.
NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

hi what happen to my article? can you please help me on why is it declined?

Accepted page or declined?

Hey uhh. I don't really understand, is this page going to be declined or accepted at the moment? (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Aras_War) Thanks. 46.71.216.205 (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Oh and also, I have put all the sources correctly. 46.71.216.205 (talk) 16:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
I would recommend going to the Teahouse or Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Martos Gallery post

Hi Noob - I took your feedback and made changes. Please can you let me know what you think? Thank you! Michael 141.155.171.60 (talk) 17:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Emergency Service

Hi Noob,

The page is for an emergency service. It really is the best place to start from, for members of the public, not sure who to talk to.

I'm trying to edit it to remove language indicating that but its sort of how the service works?

Been trying really hard to remove my biases as I feel strongly on this.

Thanks. AMumFriend (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Removed some extra sections, is it better now? AMumFriend (talk) 15:20, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
It still reads like an advertisement. I would like for you to fix it. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 18:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 83 in South Dakota (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SounderBruce was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Overreliance on self-published websites.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
SounderBruce 08:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, NoobThreePointOh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SounderBruce 08:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
I've officially removed the self-published sources and added as many as I could from newspapers and sites that are accurate. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Devils icebox changes

You reverted my changes - I work at the park and work alongside the park naturalist. I was adding information that had been left out or outdated. GeologyNerd201 (talk) 13:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Yeah, when it was clearly not sourced at all. All information that you add needs to have a source. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 13:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 83 in South Dakota (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S5A-0043 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We have a number of uncited paragraphs in the Route description section. Ideally every paragraph should have at least 1 citation.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S5A-0043Talk 14:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

To quote the boys as Kurzgesagt: "This is very bad in the extreme." A cupcake to keep you going. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 03:42, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. I hope this cheers me up :) NoobThreePointOh (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Personal information

You are revealing a lot of personal information about yourself on your Wikipedia user page, to the point where you're practically doxing yourself. You're also posting a bunch of irrelevant stuff related to things that get under your skin. If you say something like "I hate racism" and "I'm an Indian", it's going to draw a predictable response from trolls. If you don't want people to go around doxing you for real, and bringing the harassment into your offline life, you should really consider scaling back the amount of information that you openly share with the world. I get death threats all the time. By the 10th death threat, it really loses a lot of its shock value. However, I see no reason to make it easy for people, and you'll notice that my user page is devoid of personal information. I also don't go around telling people, "hey, your insult really bothered me". If I did, it would never end. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate Yeah, I might as well just remove a bunch of stuff from my description. I'm not going to let this happen to me again. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:08, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
@NinjaRobotPirate Besides, I forgot that I would never care after at least 100 death threats are sent to me. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
For what it’s worth, I think I know your location in the Charlotte area to within probably 2-3 miles. I don’t say that to creep you out, just to reinforce NinjaRobotPirate said.
Most threats are probably harmless. SWATting is always dangerous. Speaking from prior experience, if you work very long as an admin, you will sooner or later get some seriously weird, strongly aggrieved enemies outside the regular Wikipedia community. See the “quiz” on my user page for examples. —A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:44, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
@A. B. True. Even though I'm not an admin, that I think, is a problem if I do somehow miraculously become an admin. The thing is, it might take me another couple of months or even years to apply and then become a sysop. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft

Hi, I deleted the page as there is already a page of the same name in english wiki so I felt the draft was useless and should be deleted. Thanks Changeworld1984 (talk) 11:14, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Aahhh, ok, ok. My bad. You can delete it. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
@Changeworld1984 NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding. Are you an Indian too? Changeworld1984 (talk) 11:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Ummm... yes. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Rapid fire GA Noms of articles you've not worked on or improved

Why are you doing this? Especially articles with Peer Reviews and past failed GANs that have not been addressed. -- ferret (talk) 15:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

My apologies. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

GA Nominations

Hello. Not sure if you're aware or not, but generally speaking, to nominate an article for a GA, you're supposed to be a substantial contributor to the article. I mention this because I saw you nominated the Nintendo 3DS article today, and I've maintained it for most of its existence, and don't recall you editing it much, if at all. I don't think it's really ready yet either. FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 15:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Sergecross73 Sorry. I did not know that I had to be a substantial contributor. TBH, I looked at the criteria and I don't think I saw anything about having to be a substantial contributor, though. Just saying. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
See the second paragraph at WP:GAN. Sergecross73 msg me 16:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Nvm. I saw it. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

User:Graysonishimieueu

Hi there NoobThreePointOh. When dealing with clear vandals and trolls, please try to deny recognition by not responding to their threats and comments, as doing so only encourages them to come back and vandalize more. Thanks, The Night Watch (talk) 23:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@The Night Watch Ok. I never thought about that. Thanks though. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Legit.ng

Hello, I think your revert of an edit that removed content from Legit.ng was in error. The content removed was excessive detail. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Are you sure? Because to me it seemed like content removal without proper explanation. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Yes. That section, which is publicity for their editing team, was previously removed by me on 19 December, then an IP editor re-added it, so I deleted it again on 25 January, an IP editor re-added it again, and then it was removed yesterday by another IP, but you restored it. I would have just undone your edit, but that could be considered edit-warring hence I am notifying you of it here for you to undo. Once done, I will request page protection to hopefully avoid it being re-added yet again by COI editors. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Ok. I will self-revert. Thanks for letting me know. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Done. Self-reverted. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

U.S. Highway Editing.

I am just trying to get all the terminuses correct so they can be left alone for a while. Lucthedog2 (talk) 19:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

@Lucthedog2 Yes, I understand. However, Georgia interstate articles have a hidden state route with them, but they are never included since they aren't actually signed. Please don't keep adding hidden state routes to the infoboxes. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok which means 84 needs to have it say goodbye Lucthedog2 (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Lucthedog2 What does that even mean? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
look with us 84 on the list its eastern terminus it has ga405 listed which is the unsigned route so that needs to go goodbye is what i am saying. Lucthedog2 (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Lucthedog2 I'm talking about in the infobox. Not the major junctions list. In the junction list, it's okay, since it gives more clarification. However, putting it in the infobox is entirely wrong. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
it is in the info box on the list of all us highways like i was trying to put it in for us 82 but you kept deleting it but 84 has it also. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Lucthedog2 I looked, and I see no SR 405 signed along with I-95. Yes, it's seen in the major junctions, but nothing in the infobox. Also, as I said, all state routes with 400 or above never, and I mean NEVER get signed alongside interstates. Have you seen Interstate 16? Its western terminus is at I-75. However, while I-75 carries a hidden state route, it's never signed in the info box. Remember this next time. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
i was meaning like if you look at the list of us highways page look at us 84 its eastern terminus shows ga405 Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
if you look at the us highways list of numbers you will see that 84 with its eastern terminus has the unsigned highway listed. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
with 84 what if it has a concurrent state highway all through Georgia but it is signed the whole way. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Lucthedog2 I agree, but that is a state route signed with a U.S. Highway. Interstates on the other hand all have a hidden state route that is never signed along with them. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
so should it be added to 84 and should 405 be removed from 84 listed at the eastern terminus. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Lucthedog2 That is not what I'm saying. SR 405 is unsigned with I-95, so it can only be put in the major junctions list. The infobox is only for brief junctions. Meanwhile, any junction can be put in the major junctions list. The reason SR 38 gets significance over SR 405 is because it's signed alongside US 84. On the other hand, SR 405 is never signed even once, so it doesn't get any mention in the infobox. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok well you were deleting the 405 from the 82 eastern terminus after i put it there so didn't know if it needed to be removed from the 84 as well. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
@Lucthedog2 Exactly. As I mentioned, SR 405 is unsigned with I-95. I'm only trying to reach an agreement here. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok i do agree Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
with us 9 in delaware if it is signed east west in the state and the terminus is in that state should it be western or eastern terminus? Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Keep it south since the entire route itself is signed north-south. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok even though in delaware the whole of the state it is signed east west but i understand. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry. I mean for the main page keep it south. For the Delaware article leave it east-west. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for understanding now. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok and what about all the others which the start and end terminuses are different directions on the main page. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Leave them as they are. Someone else will fix the article. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
At least I appreciate you being civil here. Most people would continuously argue that they are right and the conversation would just escalate. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok you could if you want to but idk if you want to. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
No, I'd rather stay neutral. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
with the list should we update it to get all the Canadian roads as well as the Mexican ones done at the terminuses because some are missing from the list. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure. I would probably recommend asking someone like User:Imzadi1979 for help. He knows a lot more than I do. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok but the state routes that are missing should they be added. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Probably... not. I'm still a little unsure and I might take a Wikibreak right now. So you might want to ask help from him. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
And "him" is Imzadi1979. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 20:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
ok which i did. Lucthedog2 (talk) 20:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: U.S. Route 83 in South Dakota has been accepted

U.S. Route 83 in South Dakota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

AfD on Ya'akov Riftin

Just to let you know, the AfD on Ya'akov Riftin has been cancelled, as it was done by a banned editor and so the IP's removal of the template was legitimate.

Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

@AP 499D25 Thanks for letting me know. I saw the user get blocked shortly after. My bad. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 11:46, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello NoobThreePointOh!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or write things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. You've been warned about your conduct, and things like this User_talk:Deepfriedokra#A_survey are inappropriate, yet you persist. Please find something more productive to do. Star Mississippi 19:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@Star Mississippi Going to take a Wikibreak. Need to find a way to stop my mistakes. Slap on the face for me. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons

Where in this source that you reverted to reinclude does it say that Ashley is Wendy's brother? Where does it say that Wendy (not Ashley, Wendy) was raised Jewish? I can't see it.

Further, this comment is totally against the spirit of the WP:BLP policy. "It's extremely vital and helps us understand the person's early years and what type of family they have" is not a rationale for inclusion, especially borderline-private information that isn't even included in the source quoted.

I have reverted to remove the information yet again, and would like an explanation a) why you reverted to re-include it when it seemingly wasn't in the source and b) why you so badly misinterpreted the spirit of the BLP policy, in particular the spirit of the sections titled 'People who are relatively unknown' and 'Privacy of personal information and using primary sources', as well as 'Dealing with edits by the subject of the article'.

Daniel (talk) 04:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel I really thought it was sourced properly, and didn't even know that it was removed before. I'm not familiar with the BLP policy that much because usually I'm spending more time in AV trying to revert vandalism. For some reason that edit came up with the score bar being in the red (almost entirely). When I saw the edit, I misinterpreted it as just being someone who would blank content from the article and without even thinking, just reverted it. Not even once did I know that it was removed before, and I just assumed that it would be some normal IP editor trying to vandalize the article. Well, you proved me wrong. I already feel guilty for writing some comment like that. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I can understand the first revert and warning as a good-faith accident (everyone does it), but you doubled down with your comment to the IP — especially after said IP identified their connection to the subject, and the BLP-oriented rationale for removal. The first part happens to everyone, but the second part simply isn't good enough relative to our WP:BLP policy. Please ensure you read it and show more judiciousness with the handling of contested removals of information on BLP articles moving forward. Daniel (talk) 10:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
@Daniel I will certainly read it. It's all my fault. I already wrote to the IP that I was sorry and misjudged their edit to the article. Just now, I was reading about how to deal with Wikistress. Maybe when I'm on AV, I should just skip the articles that appear on the queue about people and let someone else handle that. I repeat, I've told the IP that I was sorry and what I did was wrong. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Probably I might edit some articles, but I'll probably only do it for typo and grammar fixing, citation adding, whatever. Definitely I'm not going to use AntiVandal for a while until I've gotten rid of all of my stress. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 10:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NoobThreePointOh/Archive_1&oldid=1212724787"