User talk:Nayanbhai

This is Nayanbhai's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Breckie Hill (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Breckie Hill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nayanbhai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Nyakase. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Famous Birthdays have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Famousbirthdaystodays does not appear to exist. I saw you added a link to famousbirthdaystoday in a different article though, which is not the website of Famous Birthdays. Is this your website? Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a good place to get clicks for your blog. Nyakase (talk • guestbook) 09:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Famous Birthdays, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add that famousbirthdays.com and famousbirthdaystoday.com appear to be two completely different websites. While famousbirthdays.com is notable enough to merit a Wikipedia article, famousbirthdaystoday.com appears to be an unrelated blog. Unless you have sources proving they are related, you should not conflate the two topics.

What is your association with famousbirthdaystoday.com? ~Anachronist (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famous Birthdays Today (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Famous Birthdays. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Famous Birthdays Today and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 13:03, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famous Birthdays Today (February 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Anachronist was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No meaningful changes since the last time this was declined. The cited sources are about famousbirthdays.com, not famousbirthdaystoday.com, and the text attempts to misrepresent the cited sources to be about a different website. We already have an article on Famous Birthdays, which appears to be a different entity than the topic of this draft. Do not waste reviewer time submitting drafts with substantially the same text and sources as an existing article.

~Anachronist (talk) 21:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]