User talk:Mayarakash

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 01:33, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

British Bangladeshi

Hi, I have reverted what you added to British Bangladeshi, but you can restore it if you cite it. You also need to try an avoid voicing opinions when reporting on facts. Some of what you added appeared to be offering an opinion. e.g.;

"it turned horribly wrong due to the mismanagement of the circumstance and emotions by the Police" - is this a fact, or an opinion? Who thinks this?
"to demonstrate that the Bangladeshi young people were capable of protesting without disturbance and violence" - is this a fact, or an opinion? Whose opinion?
"a total of 91 Bangladeshi councillors paved the way for the success of three MPs to date" - who says they paved the way. Have the MPs been a success? In whose opinion?

It would also be good if the article could explain why local events in Tower Hamlets are significant to British Bangladeshis as a whole.

Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the third one, it is worth mentioning that Wikipedia requires a boring and dry style of writing. What you (Mayarakash) wrote ("paved the way") was actually good writing, but not good for Wikipedia. What might have been meant was that 91 Bangladeshi councillors were elected over a particular timescale, and then later 3 MPs were also elected (if that's accurate). That is a more dry and boring statement of fact, without implying any opinion. Also easier to cite. MPS1992 (talk) 19:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]