User talk:Xpander1

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Ways to improve Armen Miran

Hello, Xpander1,

Thank you for creating Armen Miran.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a fantastically well-written article but the references are weak. Can you find addiotional references via independent, reliable sources?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JSFarman (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dina Emundts

Hello, Xpander1,

Thank you for creating Dina Emundts.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi. Thank you for doing this translation of a biography of a potentially notable living person. This article has no citations. The English Wikipedia has much stricter requirements fr sourcing than other language Wikipedia projects. As a BLP it cannot remain in Mainspace until it is fully sourced. Please also see Help:Translation, all sections, especially concerning attribution.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: I have added a few more citations to the page. Please take another look. Xpander (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jens Halfwassen

Hello, Xpander1,

Thank you for creating Jens Halfwassen.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The single source is not sufficient to establish notability and the claims made in the article. As such, the potentially notable article does mot meet the criteria at WP:NPROF. Unverifiable content can be depleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Kudpung: I have added several citations to the page. Please take a second look. If sufficient perhaps the tag can be removed? Xpander (talk) 12:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: North Rhine-Westphalian Academy of Sciences, Humanities and the Arts (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:ORG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:North Rhine-Westphalian Academy of Sciences, Humanities and the Arts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xpander1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:53, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Xpander1. Thank you for your work on Ritter Schule. Another editor, SunloungerFrog, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice article. I translated the first sentence of "Thinkers attributed to the Ritter school" as that had been left in the original German, so I would be grateful if I have got the sense right!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunloungerFrog}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

SunloungerFrog (talk) 10:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@SunloungerFrog: Thanks for your meticulous oversight. Yes it is very on point. Best. Xpander (talk) 12:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Armen Miran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armen Miran, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armen Miran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]