Jump to content

User talk:Kencf0618

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Kencf)

Ichthus: January 2012

[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Ways to improve Kalyn Heffernan

[edit]

Hi, I'm DCI2026. Kencf0618, thanks for creating Kalyn Heffernan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. A slightly more encyclopedic (or a tad dryer) tone might be appropriate for the article. Notability could be further ascertained through the inclusion of more sourced content on the page; however, current references should suffice.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Cryptocurrency/blockchain standard notice

[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome Kencf0618! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:38, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Notice of your editing being the subject of a discussion

[edit]

This message is to ensure you are aware that I have asked administrator Materialscientist to take a look at your continued misuse of dashes. Please see that discussion on their talk page. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 10:01, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maritime Executive for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maritime Executive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maritime Executive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caravella LLC-FZ

[edit]

Hello Kencf0618,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Caravella LLC-FZ for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

CoconutOctopus talk 17:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Ultramarine Linux has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Linux distribution which shows no form of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 19:55, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Last and First Men, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channeling.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of the 2025 Palisades Fire for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of the 2025 Palisades Fire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the 2025 Palisades Fire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

harrz talk 22:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign Sidekick moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Campaign Sidekick. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]