User talk:Grika/Archive/Archive 03
Solomon
[edit]"Anyone named Solomon in today's society is considered the greatest of all men. Those with this name are considered wise men with the natural ability to rule."
This is not true. Your re-edit seems just as invalid as my "vandalism." If you care to source this material with solid statistical evidence showing that those bearing the name "solomon" are in fact the "greatest of all men" and considered "wise" and possess the natural ability to rule, then please do so. Until then, I will continue to edit this strange piece of information in the Solomon page. Thanks!
K7-1481
Thomas Jefferson
[edit]You have my IP address as having "vandalized" the Thomas Jefferson page. I, NJensen, have not edited the Thomas Jefferson page at all. I'm not sure why I'm receiving this message, but I have only made one edit; that was in the Latter Day Saint category. My IP is 207.70.152.4
new comment from: kkk:....im related 2 t. jefferson...email me ....jk..i am related to him though....
This article contains no sourcing to indicate it's a common term. While I'm not an expert in the field of linguistics, I'm a pretty big Jeopardy! fan and I feel like I would have heard of this so-called "effect" before. I'm nominating this article for deletion. Robert K S 04:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Animals
[edit]I didn't think it was going to get that big, are there that many? I would just say let it grow organically, once it reaches a splitting point someone will split it. -Ravedave 19:21, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
Sorry for unhelpful editing
[edit]Dear Grika:
I am sincerely sorry for editing your Wilkipedia in a manner that was considered "unhelpful or unconstructive." Please forgive me, as I am new to the Wilkipedia. I love it! I will be sure to use the sandbox quite frequently--when I was a small child, I used to love to play in a sandbox.
Are you the owner of Wilkipedia? If you are, I would appreciate any information you can send me about it. Once again, I apologize for my unhelpfulness.
Most sincerely, Akmak03
Akmak03 12:29, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Wilkipedia article Brooke Ellison
[edit]Dear Grika,
I am so sorry that my edits to Brooke Ellison were considered vandalism. I am still waiting for the information on Wilkipedia that you promised to send me. As I said earlier, I am new to the Wilkipedia and I am still learning the "rules."
However, I am certain that the man who directed Brooke Ellison's story is named Christopher Jeeves. Please change the Brooke Ellison page to reflect this. You have 5 days to do this, please.
Also, please post the necessary Wilkipedia information on my Wilkipedia usertalking page as soon as pissible. Thank you very much! :-D
Sincerely,
Akmak03 12:31, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I love the sandbox! :-D
Sincere ignorance
[edit]Grika,
I assure you that my ignorance is not feigned.
What is more, you are correct: I can not yet appreciate what the Wilkipedia strives for, because you have not sent me the information about the Wilkipedia that you promised to send me. However, I am still willing to accept this information (along with your apology).
Please do not speak to me disparagingly with the words such as "sappy." Please DO send me the promised Wilkipedia information very soon. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Akmak03 12:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Dear Grika,
Thank you so very much for the informations that you posted on my Wilkipedia usertalking page. I am so appreciating. I have just received the information and will not wait to use it! Thank you again for your kindness.
Most sincerely,
Akmak03 15:37, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
block me
[edit]i want my ip adress to be blocked because someone is using my ip adress but do not block the real me Butterrum —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.125.114.250 (talk) 12:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
its to late i got my username blocked for some resion?
Recreational Suicide
[edit]Please do not remove my edit, recreational suicide is a real problem among the youth of today. By neglecting to address the issue you are insulting the memory of those who have passed away under these dreadful circumstances. Please think of the parents, thank you. 130.218.71.223 20:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Rubber cat
[edit]Could you please block User:Rubber cat - he/she has been removing info from You Can't Do That on Television without discussion or an explanation. PMA 11:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Grika. Could you look at this page again, and the user's contributions? The user's first edit was obvious vandalism but the latter ones may have been well-intentioned. I took them to be vandalism and posted a test3; your test4 then followed. But the edits, although faulty, may not have been vandalism and I would like to give the user the benefit of a doubt. My apologies if my (perhaps mistaken) assumption on the intent behind a mistaken edit, influenced the level of your warning. Thanks. Kablammo 21:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
AIV report
[edit]Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. Anas talk? 16:11, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
List of Minnesota blah
[edit]I made a new template for all the fauna and flora lists of minnesota. Looking at the pages, most were created by you and don't have any references. Do you remember where you got the lists? -Ravedave 03:38, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:NicolletWaterTowers.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:NicolletWaterTowers.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)