Done/To do

Done

completed the templates for the 15 Soviet republics (~~COAs still missing~~)

listed rouble and the USSR State motto in the 15 Union languages

ranked lists of

To do

the name of the USSR in the 15 official languages

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
Multi-Licensing Guide
Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Olá! Which Portuguese newspaper mentioned the Pedro Santana Lopes article?? :) Cumprimentos, muriel@pt 19:09, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Obrigada, muriel@pt 19:19, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Order of Soviet COAs and flags

Hi Explendido,

Could you explain more about the reason why ("Constitutional order") you have changed the display order of the coats of arms and flags of Soviet Union?

Saudações do Brasil,

--MaGioZal 4 July 2005 15:19 (UTC)

Claro que posso :-) It's the order by which the republics were mentioned in the Soviet Constitution, and in many official Soviet documents. It was quite frequent to mention the republics in that order. See List of Soviet Republics. --Explendido Rocha 4 July 2005 15:36 (UTC)

Blanking

Hello, Explendido Rocha. Please stop blanking Jose Castro. I understand you have strong opinions on this page. However, it's merely a redirect page, and the central article is not located under 'Jose Castro'. If someone without your knowledge on the topic were to research information on José Ribeiro e Castro, there is a chance that he or she would type in 'Jose Castro' and omit the remainder of his name. Rather than shoving that user with an existing page with no content (as blanking a page does not delete it), it would be better to be redirected to the correct page. Thanks, Sango 123 July 5, 2005 18:13 (UTC)

Cyrillic spelling

Please explain why you think Cyrillic names are so essential for articles on non-Russian towns? Should we flood all articles on Polish towns with Cyrillic spellings? And the articles on Indonesian towns with Japanese spellings? --Ghirlandajo 13:59, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic is essential to many non-Russian towns - like those in the Ukraine and Belarus'. It is specially important for Tartu, since it isn't obvious what the Russian spelling of Yuryev is; besides, I don't see the point of mentioning its German name but not the Swedish, neither of presenting its former Russian names but not mentioning the current one. --Explendido Rocha 16:49, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Correio da Manhã

I think that the translation for Correio da Manhã should be Early Mail. I didn't want to change it before talking to you, though.

Regards, --Marco ^✉ 16:29, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Onde é que eu tinha a cabeça naquele dia ... --Explendido Rocha 16:38, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Acontece... ;) --Marco ^✉ 21:03, July 20, 2005 (UTC)

Demographics of Yugoslavia

Hi Explendido Rocha,

It appears you are responsible for entering the first tables of demographics/population/area of the former Yugoslavia, back in 2005 (19 Sep 2005, 14:52). Your change (from the history page) is this link. Can you tell me the source of your data? Browsing, I just noticed that the numbers don't add up, and corrected % area of Serbia to 35.2% since 88,361km Serbia area divided by 250,790km total area is 35.2% not (the previous) 33.2%. And, since Serbia area is listed also in parts (Serbia proper, Vojvodina and Kosovo), adding these three confirms (well, is consistent with) the area number in km being right. However, I just noticed a further problem -- that the areas do not add up to the 250,790km total area of the country, but rather to closer to 255,000km (which incidentally is reported in other places as the area). At this point I don't want to make changes until actually finding the original source of the data as there appears to be more going on than just one typographical error.

Could you let me know where you got the data that you posted? I don't have a wikipedia account, but you can respond on your page here and I'll check back.

Regards,

Milos Popovic 14:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.245.163.254 (talk)

Convite

Olá Explendido Rocha! Não quererás participar nas discussões em curso em Talk:Timeline of the Muslim Occupation of Spain e Talk:Roman Spain? A questão que aí se coloca, como poderás ver, é a da utilização da palavra "Spain", com todo o que isso implica, para designar toda a Península Ibérica em qualquer momento da sua história. Participa como te aprover! The Ogre 11:13, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet anthems

I saw that you changed alphabetic order of Template:Anthems_of_the_Soviet_Republics to some other. I would like to change it back because it's hard to find states the way you left it and it's unclear why you changed the order. Cheers! Renata3 18:42, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank for lithuanian language :) You need some practise, but the babel list is seriously impressive! Anyway, about the anthems... I think for a person who is not familar with constitutional or any other order it's confusing. I am from Soviet Union myself (as you know ;)) and still don't know the order. So what to say about some American or Zimbabwian who just heard that such a thing as the Soviet Union existed? Alphabet - universal and most natural way. Don't you agree? :) Renata3 02:29, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that is such a big matter so to have a public vote. I guess you can leave it as is, just provide explanations why it's ordered like this. Because now it's confusing... Renata3 15:14, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vasco da Gama

An article that you've edited before (Vasco da Gama) is nominated for Article Improvement Drive. If you want go there and vote. Thanks. Gameiro 02:57, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for support

Hello, since you are interested in Lithuania so I thought hat you might support our letter to Centre for Cartography, Vilnius University. We are asking to release their maps found at www.balticdata.info under GFDL licence so they could be used in articles about Lithuania. So far we got 14 people to "sign" it. The draft in very very rough English is available at user:Renata3/letter. If you decide to support it, I'll need just your first and last names together with your user name. You can leave it on my talk page or send it via email: just attact @gmail.com to my user name. Renata3 21:54, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Film-studio-stub

I noticed this new stub template you created. Normally new stubs are proposed and discussed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, to ensure that there's enough stub articles (usually 60-100), and that it fits with the current hierarchy. Also, you didn't create the category the template links to...

The template is currently listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries, if you wish to comment. --Mairi 04:29, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

O.S.

Aha ... I've kinda figured out how to use it, but thanks anyway :) Question, though: why you put the O.S. date in reverse (DD/MM)? Just curious. --Barbatus 09:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Occasionally, I add the O.S. date to an article which only has a N.S. date - and then I use the way I'm used to, which is DD/MM - so N.S. may appear MM/DD and O.S. DD/MM. I generally don't pay to much attention to that. --Explendido Rocha 09:36, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I see ... so you don't mind if I reverse it back, for consistency's sake? ... Thank you again for the useful template. I wander what other cool thingies you have in store? --Barbatus 10:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - I personally prefer DD/MM/YY rather than MM/DD/YY, as suggested by an English lady who teaches translation. But I don't care that much. --Explendido Rocha 10:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - As I was born and raised in Europe, it is my preference, too. Ten years in the States have taken their toll ... Anyhow, it is not about which way is better, but rather a matter of consistency: not mixing both forms in the same date. --Barbatus 11:48, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Our forum

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 18:18, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WPSU

Welcome to WPSU! :) Feel free to weigh in on the discussions on the talk page. - FrancisTyers 13:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

my RfA

Hi, Explendido

We have edited together a number of articles, can you look into my Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alex Bakharev? abakharev 00:11, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Official names of the USSR

Hello Explendido Rocha, I would like to suggest you add some informations about the reason of the table dividing in Official names of the USSR article (separating SSR from ASSR languages [1]). It will prevent from further mistakes done by other Wikipedians and it could be also useful informative note :).

Best Regards, Visor 22:08, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salazar?

Ich verstehe Deine Bemerkung nicht. Wieso erwähnst Du Salazar in dieser Diskussion? [[2]]

Hallo Explendido Rocha, vielen Dank für die Antwort in der Diskussion. Du meinst also die "azinheira" wäre als Metapher zu verstehen, und stände für Salazar? Interessante Ansicht, gibt es "Belege" für diese Meinung? --Sei Shonagon 02:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki:pt

Olá Explendido Rocha,

Eu reparei que está a contribuir em artigos relacionados com a lusofonia e gostaria de convidá-lo para participar na Wikipédia em português, actualmente temos mais de 135 mil artigos. Sua ajuda será muito bem vinda.

Se por acaso tiver algum problema ou dúvida deixe uma mensagem na minha página de discussão.

Continue com esse bom trabalho,

Rei-artur 22:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Currency box

Hi, I noticed that you have created a currency box template. I've always wanted to do that, but it was suspended for much difficulty. Please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Numismatics/Sandbox. I just looked at it again, and I think it would be better if the exchange rate is removed from the info box, as it is

changing every day
and there is already a much more detail template for that (Template:Exchange_Rate)

Please let me know what you think. --Chochopk 10:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OldStyleDate

Hi, I saw you created the template oldstyledate, as I know nothing of template creation, I'm unable to make any changes myself. But the template OldStyleDate should really confirm to the date settings in user preferences. Bfg 19:03, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

$\sum {\frac {{\frac {A}{G}}*{\frac {A}{P}}}{n_{q}}}$

Ginásio Clube Alcobaça

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ginásio Clube Alcobaça, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Ginásio Clube Alcobaça. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Gary van der Merwe ^(Talk) 11:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

Hús ö nd 15:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Languages of the Soviet Union

Hello. You have recently reverted a block of information about use of Cyrillic script in former Soviet republics because of what seemed a factual problem. The example given in that block was perhaps inappropriate (it seemed to suggest that Baltic countries actively used Cyrillic script before 1991, though that wasn't the intention), but rather than blanking the entire area, I'd appreciate if next time you'll just correct the single factual problem you have an issue with, and leave the other information intact. In any case, I'd suggest not marking such an edit as minor. Thanks. IgorSF 05:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My objection is actually a bit larger: the article is languages of the Soviet Union, not languages of the post-Soviet states, and your additions confuse a already somewhat confusing line. The point is that those three languages can be considered to be artificially created in order to isolate those populations from the "mother" language, and it was helped by the existence of a separate alphabet. Considerations of what happened afterwards belong rather articles about the individual countries or languages. IMHO. --Explendido Rocha 09:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paulo Gammaron Felipe

Quite right. No Google hits either. And it was created by a vandal. I see no need to AGF, but didn't want to speedy in case it's genuine. So I've prodded. --Dweller 15:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese notables

Hi, since you are Portuguese, could you help fill in some of the blanks as to who these people might be at List of notable Scouts#List of notable Scouts in Portugal? It's the only country where several are listed routinely without any explanation of who they are. I have tried to fill in where I can. Thanks! Chris 11:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The list comes from here [3], but those without description are virtually unknown figures - I personally never heard of them. --Explendido Rocha 15:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help on this! Chris 22:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to feta

Thanks for your edit to the feta article. A couple of questions. You are using angle brackets <like this> for quoting words e.g. "The name <feta> comes from...". I have not seen this style on WP before. Is there a new policy? The conventions I've been following are:

foreign word in text use italics: I like pastirma
words being discussed as words use double-quotes: The word "pastirma" is Turkish
glosses follow words in single quotes: döner kebab 'turning kebab'
Greek words are not italicized (this has been discussed and decided, but I don't have the ref)
pronunciations in IPA follow words in square brackets, with a reference to IPA if it's the first mention: πρόσφατος ['prosfatos]
transliterations (if needed) do not include accents: πρόσφατος (prosphatos)

Let me know what you think. --Macrakis 16:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not using anything! My only change was using the "lang-el" template. --Explendido Rocha 16:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranked list of Norwegian counties

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Ranked list of Norwegian counties, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. (I did not nominate for deletion - only notifying) User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cup of Portugal

It's not the first time that I see your arrogant behaviour in Wikipedia. Don't be persistent, you have been blocked in the past for your «politeness». What you call "tretas and lies" (portuguese for «bulshit») will be discussed in the proper public place, e.g. talkpage and not decided by your dictatorial "explêndido" person( portuguese for «splendid» - how humble!). Concerning the matter itself there is only one type of people with that view: F.C. Porto mindlock fanatics, the very people who have made people lose belief in any sports truth in Portugal. Not impersonating this statement, your birthplace gives a hint.

Regards --Richard George 05:13, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leva a bicicleta. --Explendido Rocha 18:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree at all with Richard George's point of view, but in one thing he is right - this user is a fanatical pro-fcp anti-portugal flame-baiter - e mete a bicicleta onde te dê mais prazer.

I don't take lessons in Portugueseness from you, Richard George, Scolari and Madaíl. And take the bicycle too. --Explendido Rocha 20:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hymn of the Soviet Union (other language versions)

This page is on Wiktonary now and it is now linked to the main article. It is linked by using the template at the bottom where it say "External links." I do not know why you wish to keep this page on the site if all it that is a collection of lyrics. From what I been told in the past, collections of lyrics and other source material is supposed to be sent there. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 06:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said countless times, those versions are as official as the Russian one; so, they should be present. --Explendido Rocha 11:46, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hi

Hi. I found you in categories of users who can contribute in English and Portuguese. I myself am a native speaker of English, but I'm well on my way to learning Portuguese. Just check out my user page and talk page, and join in any of the discussions. To keep updated, you can even put a watch on my user page, which will automatically watch my talk page. :-) learnportuguese (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:UEFA national football cups

A tag has been placed on Template:UEFA national football cups requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People's Artist of Georgia

Hi; I'm looking for information on this award and noticed you created Category:People's Artists of Georgia. If you could, will you look at my question at Category talk:People's Artists of Georgia and answer there if you know the answer? Thanks. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 22:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ria Taza (newspaper)

I have nominated Ria Taza (newspaper), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ria Taza (newspaper). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. VG ☎ 08:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC) VG ☎ 08:40, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yuri Rytkheu

Hello! Don't know if you're still interested in the subject, but you created the article, so I figured I'd let you know that I've bulked it out with information from the Russian article. Cheers! -Yupik (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Explendido Rocha! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 18 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 10 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Carlos Carvalhas - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ferro Rodrigues - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
António Vitorino - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maria Barroso - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Vítor Constâncio - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jerónimo de Sousa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Manuel Monteiro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maria de Belém Roseira - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Richard Bohringer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Bjarne Reuter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Pavel Chukhrai 12. Joaquim de Almeida 13. Paulo Pires 14. Christian Noyer 15. Otmar Issing 16. Rolands Kalniņš 17. Leonor Maia 18. Rúben Pereira

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:47, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

People's Doctor of the USSR

My russian is very bad, and sometimes my attention too. Thanks for the correction!--Dimod61 (talk) 06:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paulo Pires for deletion

The article Paulo Pires is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Pires until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Phearson (talk) 16:12, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peter Praet

The article Peter Praet has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 14:44, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Os Piores Portugueses

The article Os Piores Portugueses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, possibly copyvio. cf. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/200 Greatest Israelis. List articles that simply reproduce lists published elsewhere are non-notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Os Piores Portugueses for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Os Piores Portugueses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Os Piores Portugueses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:58, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coats of arms of the Austrian states for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coats of arms of the Austrian states is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coats of arms of the Austrian states until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ ^Talk ^Email 15:52, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 06:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Moldova Suverană, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1938–39 Taça de Portugal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nacional and AA Coimbra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Egill Eðvarðsson

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Egill Eðvarðsson. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:12, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Egill Eðvarðsson

The article Egill Eðvarðsson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 08:56, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Egill Eðvarðsson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Egill Eðvarðsson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 08:57, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Portuguese Rugby Cup may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [[AEIS Agronomia|Agronomia]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yani dyunya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean Tatar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Bohringer

The article Richard Bohringer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JBH (talk) 00:36, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Explendido Rocha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Explendido Rocha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Bohringer

The article Richard Bohringer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Triptothecottage (talk) 20:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cape Verdean Chess Championship

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cape Verdean Chess Championship requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Britishfinance (talk) 10:32, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Ranked list of Venezuelan states

An article that you have been involved in editing—Ranked list of Venezuelan states—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Sharper {talk} 21:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taymyr (newspaper) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Taymyr (newspaper), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:59, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Şərq Qapısı

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Şərq Qapısı requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Taymyr (newspaper)

Hello, Explendido Rocha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Taymyr (newspaper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Taymyr (newspaper)

Hello, Explendido Rocha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Taymyr".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lang-mol

Template:Lang-mol has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]