User talk:Ecpiandy/Archive 4

?

I have to agree with Grapple's edit summary here: ? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Tip

Hi, TBrandley. I was going through some GA reviews you did on articles I nominated, and I noticed you often say that a source cannot be included because it does not meet the GNG. This doesn't make sense because the GNG is a guideline on deciding if a topic deserves its own article; it has nothing to do with reliable sourcing. I think you probably thought that it was saying the GNG of sources, but it's actually topics. Just thought I'd mention this because it might confuse unexperienced nominators. :-) TRLIJC19 (talk) 03:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll take that into account. TBrandley 18:59, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Dr. Banks.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Dr. Banks.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Review

I was wondering if you could review this article which i just nominated for GA AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:48, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Cora Cross

Hello, you put this article on hold nearly two weeks ago. Can you please finish it as I have addressed your issues. Many thanks, George^Ping! 11:23, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey. Same with Quién Dijo Ayer, you reviewed it and left it alone on July 15. Could you close it too?. Thanks. —Hahc21 05:31, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

RE:Awake

Sure. Guy546^(Talk) 16:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Awake S01E12.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Awake S01E12.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Awake FAC

Sure, I'll have a look in the next few days and leave some comments on there. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much! TBrandley 16:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

An apology

I think I owe you an apology for my comments in the FLRC. You were just trying to help, and there was no reason for me to go after you. FLC needs reviewers and people willing to take the time to go through articles before nominating them. I can't tell you how many times I've encountered people who just say "Prose needs work." Don't let our behaviour discourage you from reviewing articles in the future. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 23:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy

Hi, TBrandley. You are mislabeling your edits as "copyediting", when they are not. First of all, renaming a section is not a minor copyedit; it is a section title change. I noticed you often rename sections or assume a style of editing is mandatory, after seeing another article this way. For example, (presumably) after you noticed The X-Files episode articles had a broadcast and reception section, you asked for it to be changed to that on a Grey's Anatomy episode article GA review. Such should be avoided, because unless it is policy, it is not required. Second, I am assuming English is not your first language, because often when you "copyedit" articles, you reword the sentence into something that is clearly not grammatically correct. Such as "the series was created to be a racially diverse"-- this clearly is improper English. Finally, please stop removing quotes from the quote boxes, because it is interchangeable to have quotes, or not have them. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:45, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Awake S01E10.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Awake S01E10.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Awake S01E12.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Awake S01E12.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Question

Hi, I remember a while back, you changed all the "mid-season replacement"s on Grey's Anatomy to "midseason replacement"s. Now you are changing them back, why? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: July 30, 2012

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Newsletter: The Week of July 30, 2012

Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. Big apologies for the lack of the newsletter last week! First of all, we would like to welcome a new member to the project, TBrandley; we look forward to collaborating with him. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! We have three new good articles! The articles that were promoted are "Give Peace a Chance" (previously a DYK), which was created and developed by TRLIJC19, Sadie Harris, which was developed by Sofffie7 and TRLIJC19, and "Flight", which was developed by Sofffie7 and TRLIJC19. Grey's Anatomy and Grey's Anatomy (season 3) are in the preparations for FAC. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:

Tasks and Gudelines

*Character Pages Ensure that each character page has this section order: LEAD (and appropriate infobox) Storylines Development Casting and creation Characterization Reception References External links Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines". Model pages after Callie Torres, Lexie Grey, Owen Hunt, Izzie Stevens, Erica Hahn, Arizona Robbins, and Meredith Grey Main Page (Grey's Anatomy) Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page. General Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users. Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.

Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to develop a Grey's Anatomy-related stub or start-class article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy page with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to fix MOS inconsistencies, copyedit, add more information by researching, and remove unreferenced claims! Barnstars will be awarded to users who destub/de-start their articles, and get the quality level promoted to at least 'C' class! You can determine if an article meets the 'C' class criteria by asking for the reviewing coordinator, TRLIC19, or one of his delegates (Jonathan Harold Koszeghi and Sofffie7) to review the article. Please do not change the article's quality rating yourself; you must have it reviewed by a member of the reviewing committee. A list of stub and start class Grey's Anatomy articles can be found at the project's main page. Also, use the templates listed at the project page to recruit new members; the more the merrier! Take part in these initiatives, have fun destubbing/starting articles, feel proud after the article you cleaned up looks better, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!

Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles, and new members, soon!

--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by newsletter coordinator TRLIJC19)

Request

Hey, TBrandley. Can you choose a more natural color as a background for your talk page, as it strains my eyes every time I look at it, lol. (By the way, this is written in a comical way, and I am in no way mandating a change in color). TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

• Recent research: Conflict dynamics, collaboration and emotions; digitization vs. copyright; WikiProject field notes; quality of medical articles; role of readers; Best Wiki Paper Award

• News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP

• WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing

• Featured content: One of a kind

• Technology report: Talking performance with CT Woo and Green Semantic MediaWiki with Nischay Nahata

• Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 13:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Your offer

Regarding your offer that you mentioned here, are there any caveats to it? There are actually a few articles that I've always wanted to have someone else help me improve, but I don't mind picking just one if that's all you'd rather do. I don't mind continuing to help if it means that I can get more done. Hope this is a fair enough exchange. Davejohnsan (talk) 15:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Request

Hi, again. I was wondering if you could leave some PR comments for "Give Peace a Chance", as I am interested in seeing it become a FA. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Sure. I'll do so now. TBrandley 03:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! Also, you're in luck; a user who meets the minimum requirement to be a member of the board declined the offer, so you will be put on; pending the responses of two editors. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Great! The comments are now there. Sorry it took awhile ;) TBrandley 04:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice about user page

TBrandley, per WP:ORANGE: "Creating a fake message banner that misleads readers into thinking they have new messages is prohibited". It used to be allowed, but after an RfC in February 2012, it was banned. That said, you must remove them from your user page and talk page. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

They are gone now. Don't put them back.—Kww(talk) 21:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thanks for fixing, and letting me know. TBrandley 23:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter

We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees Cwmhiraeth (submissions) as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees Grapple X (submissions) in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees Muboshgu (submissions) in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's Ruby2010 (submissions) follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Do you know who changed it

Hi, TBrandley. I just finished fixing the theatre film and drama GA listings back to the appropriate way, and it took an hour! That said, do you know who originally changed it so I can explain to them why it was inappropriate? Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice about c/e

Hi, TBrandley. Please refrain from editing Grey's Anatomy, as it's being copyedited. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Finally, a copy-edit. Congrats! TBrandley 20:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Sherlock (TV series)

Thank you for your extensive GA review of Sherlock (TV series), and helping to get it up to GA standard. It's taken many, many hours to get it to that state. I really appreciate your specific advice too, and willingness to make a couple of changes yourself. Thanks again. The JPS^{talk to me} 22:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the recognition. Have you considered getting the article copy-edit so you can go to FAC, and make to article reach Featured Article status? TBrandley 22:07, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Mmm, not sure. FAC is so time-consuming with little benefit to the reader. I think my time could be better spent elsewhere improving Cs to Bs, etc. I think my next ambition, to complete my Steven Moffat set (Sherlock is my fifth Moffat article to achieve GA/FA) is to get Coupling (UK TV series) up to GA (which requires some more work, particularly in the Characters section). The JPS^{talk to me} 22:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Good luck. When its ready, I'd be happy to review that. TBrandley 16:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar

TBrandley, I can say that I am deeply impressed by the gradual change you have been displaying in your quality of editing. Specifically, your GA reviews have gone a long way. You've gone from doing whitewash reviews like this, to highly extensive reviews like this. You have received much criticism throughout your time on Wikipedia, but you have not let it affect your enthusiasm to improve your editing. I hope you continue working hard, and keep trying to excel on Wikipedia! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I appreciate the recognition. Typically, I try to take "constructive criticism" rather than taking it as person who is a "hater". TBrandley 22:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

That's a good way to look at it. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! TBrandley 22:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

?

I have explained this already. What is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.29.229 (talk) 22:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

You can't go against Wikipedia guidelines. That is a violation of WP:COPYVIO. That's the problem. TBrandley 22:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

REPLY and I explained how it is NOT a copyright violation. When I asked if you and the person who obviously consulted you about this if you wanted me to school you about this and REALLY get into it ha ha, you disappear! I am telling you that this is NON FREE USE, and yeah I'm yelling and if there is a problem with that oh-well I'm also trying to tell you, do you really want to get into this here? How many OTHER television Wikis have you destroyed with this faulty reasoning?68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

68.37.29.229, I understand you may be frustrated, but you are getting out of hand. I have warned you about your behavior on your talk page way back in April. I do not know anything about this copyright dispute, but regardless, it should be dealt with by having a discussion, not by leaning towards personal attacks. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

REPLY asking what other television show entries have been ruined by deleting content is not a personal attack! Neither is typing in all caps, but whatever. I do not appreciate trying to help Wikipedia be good, and having my efforts erased as soon as I post them. You may have time to hang around here all the time but most people do not and they probably, (like myself), do not appreciate taking the time to contribute material to then have it deleted.68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Writing in caps is often considered offensive, and should be refrained. Saying "How many OTHER television Wikis have you destroyed with this faulty reasoning?" is insinuating that TBrandley is not editing in good faith, and is leaning towards a personal attack. Did you notice I said "leaning towards" personal attacks? You have not actually reached that point, but you are getting there. If the material you are trying to add is in fact a copyright violation (not saying it is; as I'm not familiar with the current situation), it must be deleted, regardless of how long you spent adding it. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:NFCC Non Free Content Criteria — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:51, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

That page refers to images, not text. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

BY THE WAY, WP:NFCI is one of the places where non free use is explained. That is why copying and pasting episode descriptions is not a "copyright violation" according to Wikipedia-ok? If you have any more problems with that I suggest that you make an issue out of it instead of trying to divert the discussion into the topic of, (non-existent/imaginary) "personal attacks".68.37.29.229 (talk) 23:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:NFCC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.29.229 (talk) 01:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

If you read my summary, it says I was a (talk page stalker). That's a huge personal attack. I don't appreciate your behavior, and I didn't reply because I was "offline". Is that allowed? I now know that you have been blocked for now. And another thing, as non-free content is only for images, not words/text. Your comments can hurt people's feelings; read WP:COPYVIO.TBrandley 04:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

And a special thanks to TRLIJC19 for his comments/explanations. TBrandley 04:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Note

Hi again. I noticed you updated the PP article to reflect Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Abbreviations#Acronyms and initialisms. Instead of writing that long link out in the edit summary, I created an MOS shortcut to the same section (MOS:ACRO). Hope it helps make things easier, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Cool. That does make things easier. Thanks! TBrandley 23:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Re:Awake episodes

That's awesome, I know they are going to be great. Also great job on "Game Day" so far, it just needs references. QuasyBoy (talk) 05:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Yep, you're the best at this stuff. :) QuasyBoy (talk) 05:56, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1‎.
Message added 15:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I have fixed that redirect issue. TBrandley 08:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Reply

I will have a look through soon! — M.Mario (T/C) 16:02, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I appreciate it! TBrandley 05:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments on Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Reviewer#User:Hahc21

Thanks for your help in making Wikipedia great! Just a quick littler note: Per this thread - and it's a long one (), please don't make comments like "looks good", etc on Requests for Permissions, as the granting admin still has to look over the user in question's contribs/etc, regardless of your comments. Thanks! Theopolisme _TALK 05:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for thanking me! Also, I know. Thanks for letting me know, as I also use (Non-administrator comment). TBrandley 05:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure, happy to. Darn, my signature looks weird here... ah well. :P Theopolisme _TALK 05:18, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Lol ;) TBrandley 05:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Non admin observations are generally not helpful, particularly at WP:PERM which is really strictly an admin-only area, and as yet, has no real need for clerking. Unless those comments are from long-term, very experienced users whose names we recognise, they are usually ignored. The same goes in part for several other admin noticeboards where commentators are not directly involved (there has recently been a long discussion about this at AN/I). One area where we are urgently looking for more editors is NewPagePatrol - an essential Wikipedia process. As you have significant experience in article creation and content editing, you may wish to learn more about it at WP:NPP, and if you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

RfA

Short of a miracle, M&E's RfA is obviously not going to succeed. I wonder if adding more questions at this stage is really necessary. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Figured I would ;0 TBrandley 05:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

• It's fine; at the very least, it gave people a bit more insight into my understanding of policy so they can further ascertain some areas in which I could improve. I appreciate the interest in my candidacy. Take care. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 09:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Awake episodes

Since when has the above article been promoted to FL status? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 08:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

It hasn't. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Awake episodes/archive2. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

No, I'll remove for now. Just observing, TBrandley 08:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

That's what I thought Kudpung; but Tate's userpage made me think it had. Anyways, I hope it gets promoted soon! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Old of the oldest nominees on the list! TBrandley 08:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Feedback on Grey's Anatomy

Did you notice some IP comments at the feedback page for Grey's Anatomy? I wish I could respond, because it is ridiculous how they are complaining that there is not a list of episodes. If they want a list of episodes, why don't they go to List of Grey's Anatomy episodes? Lol, it's bothersome. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

I know. Agreed. TBrandley 04:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Also, the other qualified user declined, so if you are still interested in being monitor of WP:Grey's, let me know. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

For sure I'm interested! Thanks, TBrandley 04:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Awake episodes was just promoted!! Congratulations!! :D TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:38, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Awesome. One more article ready for Awake GT. Thanks for letting me know. Awesome :) TBrandley 04:37, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

2012-13

Don't revert again by erasing 2013. There are 24 episodes; it is a technical impossibility that they all air in 2012. In order to do that, more than one episode would have to air per week. That has never been done on primetime TV; so WP:COMMONSENSE comes into play. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Fair enough. Above, May 2013 should just be 2013. It is unknown for the end/month in 2013. That's a for sure WP:CRYSTAL. TBrandley 06:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah I changed that. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh. TBrandley 06:10, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Grey's Anatomy episodes/archive1.
Message added 07:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 07:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I have seen your comments. TBrandley 08:44, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Congratulations on your first featured content! Hopefully, I can get some featured content too soon! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Mmm, that pie is delicious. I deserve some dessert (Lol) I'm surprised you haven't got any "featured content" yet. ;) TBrandley 08:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

I think it's because I've recently been spending so much time with the good article process, rather than featured (I have 18 good articles). But hopefully, I will have 4 new pieces of featured content soon (Grey's Anatomy, List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy), List of Grey's Anatomy cast members)! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

I've gotten 12 good articles as of right now. Two are awating to be promoted :)/failed :(. Good luck on those. Oh, and I'm going to leave some final comments for the list of GA episodes at your talk page if that's okay. Two are also awating for FA :0 TBrandley 01:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do; I would like to nominate it directly after. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I will do that right now. Don't think the article will need a copy-edit as there is only a three paragraphed lead, was like that for List of Family Guy episodes. Good luck, and again, I'll write directly after I'm finished writing this message, haha. TBrandley 01:33, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	I am impressed with your work on all Awake-related articles. Congrats on the promotion of List of Awake episodes to featured list status! Keep up the great work! Another Believer (Talk) 15:36, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the recognition! Its appreciated. TBrandley 16:52, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For the brownie. I'm not a huge barnstar person, but some recognition from time to time is greatly appreciated. Again, thanks. Giants2008 (Talk) 16:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your welcome. While I'm at it, I'll thank you again. :) TBrandley 03:17, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Reviews

Are you planning to finish the articles you were reviewing a month back? Soem are still up and have now stalled. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 22:57, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, yeah. For lots of them, I'm still waiting for the remaining issues to be addressed. Don't really like failing articles ;( Just added more to Green Lantern (film)'s GA, by me. TBrandley 03:13, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I think it behooves you to post something to the other three holds—Google Chrome, Cora Cross, and Satyamev Jayate (TV show)—to at least say what still needs to be done there. In each of these, there have been followups since your last post, all of which were prior to the end of the drive. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:43, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for letting me know! I'm going to fail Google Chrome as no issues have been addressed for quite a while now. Pyrotec's comments have also not been addressed. TBrandley 03:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)t

Sounds good, especially if no one is making the necessary adjustments to the article. They can always renominate at a later time. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Great point. I have remind the nominators for all the other articles above. Cora Cross is almost ready, while Satyamev Jayate, as said, I am reminding them. Thanks, TBrandley 03:57, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

The nominator for Green Lantern (film) has stated that he will addressed the new comments on Monday or Tuesday. Oh, he has now stated that he will fix those issues tonight. TBrandley 04:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Good to know. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of The Simpsons episodes/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I understand if you're busy, just wanted to make sure that you've seen my comment. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I have left some more comments. TBrandley 17:52, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Replied there. :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 18:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Bump. Theleftorium ^(talk) 08:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

I have replied at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons discography/archive1. Theleftorium ^(talk) 19:30, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Wheel_of_Fortune_(U.S._game_show)#Move

Do you think you might want to chime in here? Seems like a subject that you are knowledgeable about.--24.57.21.2 (talk) 16:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I guess. TBrandley 16:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposal Real Housewives of New Jersey Episode guide

I would like to propose that the episode information that was deleted be undo-that the info. be put back up and that the correct procedure as per Wikipedia be used before it is removed from the page. With a notice at the top of the page like the one that I have only put on one Grey's Anatomy episode. Otherwise, in my spare time I may get real busy here with that kind of thing. If that sounds like that threat-you can take it that way if you want but all I am claiming is that I may begin following the rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your edit to Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy) has been reverted. The plot summary is within a normal length (2 paragraphs), which is shorter than most articles. For example, Squeeze (The X-Files) is a featured article (one of Wikipedia's finest), and it's plot summary is longer than Give Peace a Chance's. For Real Housewives, you cannot restore the information and place {{plot}} on the top of the article. That template doesn't make sense at all. First of all, it is for tagging article's with plot summaries that are too long. The summaries you are trying to add to that page are of a reasonable length. Second, maintenance/warning templates can only be used if the plot is written by the author/in the public domain. There are some cases on Wikipedia that the information has to be removed immediately. One instance, in this case, is copyrighted material, which needs to be removed immediately. Another is when people add unsourced information to biographies of living people–that also has to be removed immediately. I hope you understand everything I said, TRLIJC19 (talk •

contribs) 17:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

It must be nice to have so much control where you and your alleged, (by myself)socks get to make all the decisions without using the proper consensus. Do you really think it is fair to revert a question that I had about your work?-it sure doesn't seem right to me. And before you act offended at being alleged to be a sock I will let you know it is because you and your sockpopputes (alleged) all seem to be ignorant about the exact same thing which I find to be astonishing for even one person to be so unlearned.nopnopnorobopnororo68.37.29.229 (talk) 18:08, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

And also because you are using two different user names. Tbrandley (which is the user who made the change that TRLIJC19 claims to have made which leads me to conclude that you forgot that you are the same person.68.37.29.229 (talk) 18:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Really. TBrandley is me, and TRIJC19 are a seperate editors. TBrandley 18:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I can assure you that I have no associations with TBrandley's account, and I give permission to perform checkuser tests on my account if deemed necessary. I said to you, "Your edit to Give Peace a Chance has been reverted", because the page is on my watchlist and I saw that it had been reverted. I did not say "I reverted your edit". Please read sentences before making false accusations. It is not just me and TBrandley that went against your copyright infringement, but it was also Logical Fuzz, and 3 administrators. Also, the ignorance is coming from you, as you fail to understand any policy. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I've striked my above comment after rethinking it, because until a user with valid reasons insinuates something, I do not need an SPI opened on me. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

List of GA eps

Hi, I finished addressing most of the issues, but I had some questions regarding tasks you posted. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I have replied on your talk page. Did you get the very bottom message? TBrandley 19:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

ANI

You have notified me about an ANI I have been involved with. Sorry, I do not see it. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I have answered on your talk page. Thanks, TBrandley 21:51, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added  Ryan Vesey 01:50, 7 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

• Op-ed: The Athena Project: being bold

• News and notes: FDC portal launched

• Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases

• Featured content: Casliber's words take root

• Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity

• WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 10:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: August 6, 2012

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Newsletter: The Week of August 6, 2012

Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. First of all, we would like to welcome three new members to the project: M.Mario, Tvlover96, and Mattom123; we look forward to collaborating with them. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is now a featured list candidate! If promoted, it will be our first piece of "in-house" featured content! Feel free to leave comments or voice your opinions here. Grey's Anatomy, Grey's Anatomy (season 3), and "Give Peace a Chance" are in the preparations for FAC. An administrative board has been added to the project, to make sure the internal processes run smoothly. Any member has the chance to join, and further information is given at the project page. Currently, however, all the positions are filled, so if you are interested, please contact the coordinator and you will be placed on a waiting list. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:

Tasks and Gudelines

Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them. Character Pages Ensure that each character page has this section order: LEAD (and appropriate infobox) Storylines Development Casting and creation Characterization Reception References External links Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines". Model pages after Callie Torres, Lexie Grey, Owen Hunt, Izzie Stevens, Erica Hahn, Arizona Robbins, and Meredith Grey Main Page (Grey's Anatomy) Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page. General Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users. Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.

Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week, an extent of last week's, is to develop a Grey's Anatomy-related stub or start-class article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy page with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to fix MOS inconsistencies, copyedit, add more information by researching, and remove unreferenced claims! Barnstars will be awarded to users who destub/de-start their articles, and get the quality level promoted to at least 'C' class! You can determine if an article meets the 'C' class criteria by asking a member of the project's administrative board to review the article. Please do not change the article's quality rating yourself; you must have it reviewed by a member of the committee. A list of stub and start class Grey's Anatomy articles can be found at the project's main page. Take part in this initiative, have fun destubbing/starting articles, feel proud after the article you cleaned up looks better, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!

Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles soon!

--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which I withdrew several hours ago just prior to its scheduled closure. I appreciate all the imput I received, and I hope it'll help me grow and develop myself as a Wikipedian.

Oh, and on that related note, I've commented on Kudpung's post above. To reiterate, I'm at least appreciative of the fact that you gave people the opportunity to gain further insight into my policy knowledge and judgement, so that they can offer up additional feedback on where I might want to improve in preparation for any future RfA's I might submit.

Take care. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 09:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. In your next nomination you will get the "tools" and "powers" :) Great way of taking it. TBrandley 15:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1.
Message added 16:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy again

I've already told you this: please do not make major edits to Grey's Anatomy right now; a user is copyediting and doesn't need to deal with edit conflicts. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Clarification

Your question at the Help Desk really confused Dodger67 and myself. Could you please tell us what you meant? FloBo A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 12:40, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I have further explained at the help desk. TBrandley 16:22, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Simpsons articles

Hey man, thanks for passing my GA nomination yesterday! :) Could you please revisit Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of The Simpsons episodes/archive1 as soon as possible? If you think the article meets the FL criteria now, could you please state that so the closing FL director knows this? I'd also appreciate if you could respond to my comments/questions at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Simpsons discography/archive1. Thanks, Theleftorium ^(talk) 15:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

List of GA eps FLC

Hi, TBrandley. I don't want you to take this as rude, because I appreciate your help with the list.. As this is my first featured content nomination, I'd like the chance to fix issues raised by other users myself. It seems as though every time a user posts new comments, I am offline, and you address them. Since I am the nominator, I would like to be able to. That said, could you please not address any coming comments, and leave them for me to address? Again, I don't want to sound rude, it's just that I was really excited to be able to have my own nomination in which I would be primarily responsible for its promotion. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure. That's fine. I know how that feels :) TBrandley 18:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Template images...

I have asked for clarification on the issue on WP:ANI#Television series templates. Nate • (chatter) 03:11, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I'll take a look. Thanks for letting me know. TBrandley 03:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nightswimming (Awake)

The article Nightswimming (Awake) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Nightswimming (Awake) for things which need to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

There are still a few issues remaining at the review page. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I got all of those issues. Thanks for letting me know here. TBrandley 05:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nightswimming (Awake)

The article Nightswimming (Awake) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nightswimming (Awake) for comments about the article. Well done! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Request

I was wondering if you could review Up All Night (One Direction album), I nominated it for GA today. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 22:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to look some time soon. I'm busy at the moment. TBrandley 22:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for considering, someone has started btw I love your talk page design so I'm using it for my talk know. Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Great. TBrandley 23:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

New message

Hello, you have a new message here User_talk:Hahc21#Sign --Tito Dutta ✉ 03:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Sorry for the rude comments I made. If possible, could you respond to my points? Regards. Kürbis (✔) 10:57, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks for the cheeseburger... mmm its good. :) TBrandley 14:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help desk.
Message added SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have replied there. Thanks, TBrandley 01:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Rollback

Something changed in the way rollback appears so I accidentally made this edit. It appeared like a wikilink in the edit summary that said "rollback more than 10 edits" and I was curious as to what it was linking to so I clicked it. Then I realized I accidentally rolled back your edits. Sorry 'bout that. Ryan Vesey 18:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

That's okay; no problem. That happens to me all the time. :) Thanks for coming here to let me know! TBrandley 01:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: August 13, 2012

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Newsletter: The Week of August 13, 2012

Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is still a featured list candidate! If promoted, it will be our first piece of "in-house" featured content! If uninvolved with the list, we urge you to leave comments, review the article, and support or oppose it here. Grey's Anatomy, Grey's Anatomy (season 3), and "Give Peace a Chance" are also still in the preparations for FAC, while List of Grey's Anatomy cast members is being developed by TRLIJC19. "Losing My Religion" is now a GAN; it was developed by Sofffie7 and copyedited by TRLIJC19. There is currently a discussion awaiting feedback here; please provide your input there. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:

Tasks and Gudelines

Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them. Character Pages Ensure that each character page has this section order: LEAD (and appropriate infobox) Storylines Development Casting and creation Characterization Reception References External links Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines". Model pages after Sadie Harris, Callie Torres, Lexie Grey, Owen Hunt, Izzie Stevens, Erica Hahn, Arizona Robbins, and Meredith Grey Main Page (Grey's Anatomy) Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page. General Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users. Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.

Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to create a non-existent/redirect Grey's Anatomy episode article, using the relevant guidelines above! Model your article off of a Grey's Anatomy episode article with GA status. Use your Wikipedia skills to research information, copyedit, remove unreferenced claims, and add pictures! Barnstars will be awarded to any user who creates a well-sourced article, that has a quality of at least 'start'! To determine the quality, ask a member of the administrative board to review your article; please do not change the article's quality yourself. Take part in this initiative, have fun creating an article, feel proud after the article you created is existent, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!

Have fun, and don't forget to cite everything you write! We hope to see several expanded articles soon!

--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)

Thanks for this newsletter. All I have to say; cool newsletter. TBrandley 01:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Opinion at WT:Grey's

Hi, Tate! I started a discussion here, and would really appreciate your feedback/opinion on the matter. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

I have added a comment related to the scope there. TBrandley 01:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Regarding your new position as monitor of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy

Hi Tate, thank you for agreeing to serve as monitor of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy, and better help out the community. This message is to inform you of the duties associated with the position. As monitor, you are in charge of monitoring all pages within the scope of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy. The pages you need to watch are the main page, the episode list, the character list, the cast list, the awards list, each season and character (full list can be seen here), and each episode. To find all the episodes, go to the episode list (each episode with a link you need to watch). If you notice that one of the pages you are watching has been vandalized, please rollback the edit, and warn the user/IP. If consistent vandalizing occurs, either (a) report the user/IP to WP:AIV, or (b) if it is multiple IPs vandalizing, request semi-protection of the page at WP:RPP. If someone adds unsourced/copyrighted information to a page, please revert with a good-faith message, and explain to the user/IP on their talk page (preferably with a twinkle template) why the edit was inappropriate. If the user/IP continues to add the unsourced/copyrighted content after being given a final warning, please report the user/ip to WP:ANI. If several users are edit warring across a page(s), please warn both users/IPs, and if they don't stop, report them to WP:AN/EW. Further, if you suspect any editor/IP is committing sockpuppetry, or has a conflict of interest, please report them to the relevant page. To notify other board members of your position, please place {{User ABoard Grey's}} somewhere on your user page, which will automatically add you to Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy administrative board members.

Thanks again for joining! Please confirm that you understand all of your duties; and do not hesitate to ask questions. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. I'll put all on those pages above on my watchlist. Great! TBrandley 01:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

List of Awake episodes

Hi, again. I think the DVD release section should be removed. You said it yourself before; there will be no DVD released for the show. N/As on other lists are for shows where some seasons were released on DVDs. This show never had a DVD; it is misleading to readers to have N/a; the information is available. N/A represents unknown information, but the information is known that there is no DVD. Just as it was removed from Awake, I think it should be removed here. I hope you understand why it should be removed, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Why do you send a message to yourself? :) Haha. TBrandley 01:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

But, to answer your original question. I don't really know if it should stay or go. We should probably develop some consensus before making those changes. TBrandley 01:55, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh my god! I am so dumb today, lol! Well being that you are the primary contributor, I will leave it up to you. I, however, see no point in its existence. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Lol. I'll try to get a hold of some consensus on the talk page. TBrandley 02:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good. I always get mixed up with our user pages on my watchlist, because both of our accounts start with 'T'. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Haha. :) Cool. :) TBrandley 02:03, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Article assessments

Hi again, Tate. I was wondering if you used the article assessment feature? I started using it a while ago, and find it extremely helpful. When you go to an article, the title of the article changes to the assessment's color (green for GA, blue for FA, etc.), and gives notes about the article's quality, status directly below. To use it, click on 'my preferences', then 'gadgets', then scroll down to the 'appearance' header, then select "Display an assessment of an article's quality as part of the page header for each article. (documentation)"-- it's the 14th feature in the list. Then click 'save' at the bottom. The feature will then be active. There is usually a delay of a few hours when the article's quality is changed, or it becomes a nominee for something. It's really cool. I am writing this because I was wondering if any other users utilize this awesome feature. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I've never seen it before; it looks like a great feature. I have activated it, but, as you said, it might take a while to start working. It is cool. Cheers! TBrandley 03:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

A quick little update: its working now. TBrandley 03:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

How do you like it? Is it cool to see List of Awake episodes in dark blue lettering? Lol, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Its awesome; haha. TBrandley 04:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I'd appreciate your input here, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

• Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden

• News and notes: Bangla-language survey suggests the challenges for small Wikipedias

• Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration

• Featured content: On the road again

• Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit

• WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution

• Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Herbert Davis

Hey, do you have a source saying that HD is the cinematographer? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

[1]. I'll add to the article in "Production team". Regards. TBrandley 23:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Or [2]. Regards. TBrandley 23:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

The first seems to be of a higher quality. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Right. I'll add the details into the actual article. TBrandley 00:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done. TBrandley 00:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

FAC

Need to have another look at it, given it is an extensive article. Hopefully I'll get back and post more comments later this week. Lemonade51 (talk) 00:13, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Cool. :) Thanks! TBrandley 00:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Awake FAC length

Awake's FAC has been open for a month now; hopefully it will garner some supports. I've seen so many FACs closed because even though there was no consensus not to promote, there was also no consensus to promote. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I know. I'm really trying to get some more editors to review the article. Do you know of anyone? Regards. That happened with M.Mario's FA, Poppy Meadow, then he contacted the FA director, then asked. The director said that he could nominate it again with the two week limit, and M.Mario got permission. That being said, if this fails (oh no! :(; I will contact an FA director, and ask about it. Thanks for coming here! TBrandley 00:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't think you need more reviewers; quite a few users reviewed the article. What you need is for those reviewers to either support/oppose. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

You right; suppose so. Logical Fuzz (talk · contribs) hasn't look through the whole article; it was just a quick comment, so, that shouldn't hopefully effect anything. Nikimaria (talk · contribs) never supports or opposes, and it normally works out fine; he has noted that on his page. My goal is to try and get Lemonade or Grapple supporting. Cheers, TBrandley 00:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

The correct thing to do would be to ask them to support or oppose, so not to canvass. By the way, I'm almost positive Nikkimaria is a girl, lol. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, yeah. Good point. I'll try to ask for that. Thanks and regards. TBrandley 00:36, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

To note, I will not brother asking Maria, or Fuzz to support/oppose, as Maria only does source reviews; always has, and as stated above, never supports, doesn't really change the result. Plus, Fuzz, was only there to leave a quick comment, so. TBrandley 00:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

10,000 edits

Congrats! How do you get 1,000 edits over the course of a week? That's crazy, lol. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I know. That is crazy, furthermore, I wasn't online for most of the day here. Guess I make a lot of minor edits, oh, and big edits that are not minor. :) 1,000 is one week; that is crazy. :) Thanks! TBrandley 01:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I recently hit 7,000; if I get 1,000 more I'll be a "veteran editor"! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Congrats, and great work; cool. I'd be there, but, I've only been here since November 2011 (when I made stupid edits :( Lol), I can't. :( Lol again. Thanks, TBrandley 01:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

New message! Heads up!

Good morning, you have a new message with a request here --Tito Dutta ✉ 02:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

FLC for Arrested Development awards list

Hi TBrandley, I see that you're very active at FLC. I'm wondering if you could take a quick look at my nomination, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Arrested Development/archive1. Thanks. -- Wikipedical (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure. I love Arrested Development; I will get some issues for you within a day. Cheers, TBrandley 03:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

User page

I like the way you developed your user page! The introduction text resembles my user page a lot ;) I also did not know you were a young editor. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reading! And commenting here, yeah, I am. I've added a tiny bit more. Cheers! TBrandley 06:12, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/CPJ International Press Freedom Awards/archive1

Hi TBrandley, just to let you know I've left a couple of comments regarding flags and linking (noting that there are two different styles used in FLs) and was wondering if you could comment. Thanks. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Homer Simpson, This Is Your Wife/archive1

I've replied to your comments at the FAC! :) Theleftorium ^(talk) 22:56, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Steve Waugh/archive1.
Message added 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 10:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Your edit-warring

Before you go around warning other editors for things, perhaps you should remind yourself about your own block history. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 20:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

The past is the past. The fact that he was once blocked for edit warring doesn't mean he loses the ability to warn others for the same. Ryan Vesey 20:32, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Three block in three weeks, all this year, tells the story. Anyone can warn anyone about anything, but without established credibility it doesn't mean anything. It would be like someone habitually charged with DWI issuing warnings to others about driving drunk. It can't be taken seriously. Will I find any blocks in your history, Ryan? --76.189.121.5 (talk) 20:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

TBrandley has made over 10,000 edits to Wikipedia. His credibility is not in question. Trying to point score off his block history won't work, and before even trying to do that, you should make sure that your own history is squeaky clean. You have a demonstrated history of attacking other editors after only 10 edits and managed to breach 3RR on your ninth. You only managed to avoid a block for making eight reverts because I had requested the page be protected. Does that mean your credibility is in serious question? And really, this is highly inappropriate. You need to start assuming good faith. --AussieLegend (talk) 21:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

If he's made over 10,000 edits, then he has absolutely no excuse for recently getting blocked three times in three weeks. You should've thought about that comment before you posted it. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 21:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Any recent blocks have absolutely nothing to do with your edit-warring at Hotel Hell. You need to stop playing the blame game and get on with editing in a collaborative and constructive manner. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:56, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it means "absolutely nothing" that someone who's made 10,000+ edits has been blocked three times in three weeks. Or that you and your group of collluding editors reverted nine times in two hours today. You keep telling yourself those things if it helps you sleep better. We're enjoying your pathetic denials and hilarious, non-sensical posts. (We see from your post that "your" is supposed to be bolded. Hahaha) Anyway, please give us more. You're great entertainment. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 03:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

IP, you're breaching towards a personal attack here. Regardless of what happened in the past, TBrandley is a good editor. Your edits were being reverted because you had no consensus to back your changes, and you were going against WP:LEAD. I suggest instead of criticizing others' edits, you take this time to review some of Wikipedia's key policies including those on civility, edit warring, consensus, and personal attacks. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, his three blocks in 16 days indicates how good he is. Haha. But let's take a look at your history, TRLIJC19. Let's see, three blocks for edit-warring. Now take your meaningless, laughable, hypocrtical lectures somewhere else. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 05:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

The past is the past. I honestly have no problems with my blocks being brought up. Yes, I was blocked three times for edit warring; last year. Editors learn from mistakes and grow from them. Enough already; if you don't stop this behavior, you can look forward to a possible block for edit warring and personal attacks. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

You're no different than a guy who gets arrested for DWI three times, then goes around lecturing other people about driving drunk. Or a 500 pound guy telling someone to go on a diet. You have zero credibility. Get a life. Now, you want to continue interjecting yourself in something that's absolutely none of your business? Bring it on. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 05:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

There is nothing to do with past blocks and giving warning/notice. The only question should be– is he giving those notices correctly? Stop making personal attacks. --Tito Dutta ✉ 05:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

He's done the same thing to me. The IP is wildly out of control, and is throwing anything he can find against the wall in the hope something will stick. This is WP:BOOMERANG, and how. --Drmargi (talk) 05:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

I really don't understand why this IP isn't being blocked yet. The personal attacks he/she is throwing at everyone are ridiculously unacceptable. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 05:51, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Haha, you guys act like your 10 years old. Margi, maybe about six years old. "He's done the same thing to me." Hilarious! Now go to bed. Then when you wake up, get a life. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

When instead of taking responsibility for your actions, you bring up people's block history, it just shows your level of immaturity. Please be civil. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, let's just ignore the fact that you've been banned from editing three times for edit-warring, yet go around warning other people about their actions. That makes total sense. Haha. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 06:07, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm not ignoring anything. Yes, I made mistakes last year, and got blocked not banned for edit warring. I regret doing it, and have since learned from my errors. But, that has nothing to do with you edit warring and throwing personal attacks at editors. I am currently in good standing, and am completely permitted to discuss Wikipedia's key policies with an IP. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

One block. Fine. Two blocks. Maybe. Three blocks. It's over. You have no credibility. So go ahead and "discuss" whatever you want with someone, but I assure you that you will be talking to yourself. Your history shows you have annoyed many other editors, as well. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

You seem to be ignoring the fact that you are the one edit warring now; not last year. I don't know how many more times I can say it; I apologize for my past errors. Believe it or not, but you can regain credibility after a block. Following my blocks, I took time to learn about Wikipedia's policies. Earlier this year, I received rollback and reviewer rights; user privileges given to trusted credible users. Users have come back and become great editors after a lot more than three blocks. I have been on Wikipedia for 4 years, have 19 good articles, 2 articles in preparation for featured article status, and 2 in preparation for featured list status. So as far as I'm concerned, I have enough credibility to discuss behavioral policies with an IP. Further, if you don't stop this behavior, you will most likely be blocked for personal attacks; and let me tell you, not to justify edit warring in any way, but a personal attack block is considered a lot worse than a block for edit warring. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk to someone who cares. Don't you have a life? I will admit that you are somewhat entertaining, though. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 06:40, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

You know what, TRLIJC19. After listening to you for awhile, and reading your user page, I've decided to stop giving you, and others, a hard time. You actually seem like an extremely nice guy. I have no doubt that you have learned from your mistakes on here and are doing an excellent job in helping this project. And there are a lot of things that are much worse than edit-warring on some website. I was just yanking your chain anyway about the blocks. Don't worry, you have plenty of credibility. Good luck on your road to becoming a psychiatrist. I'm sure you'll be a great one. Please accept my apologies. I was just kidding around with you. All the best. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 07:03, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

And my apologies to all the other editors involved. My edit on the Hotel Hell page was sincerely intended as a very friendly, postitive effort to improve the content that was already there, and just remove a few pieces that I truly believed weren't necessary. I figured everyone would appreciate the rewrite. Anyway, please accept that I am sorry for causing any problems, hurting anyone's feelings, and causing a disruption. You all appear to be very good people. Best regards. --76.189.121.5 (talk) 07:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

I understand the frustration you were feeling when your edits were being reverted. You are hardly to blame; when you first start editing, there's no way you could know all of the editing guidelines already. I recommend creating an account, and reading over lots of Wikipedia guidelines. I am sure you could make a great editor. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Wow; just saw of all this. Thanks to everyone who has gotten involved here, and for the sorry note. Cheers to everyone. TBrandley 04:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

AN/I

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Double images opinion

Your opinion would be appreciated here. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:42, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Your request for file-moving

Hi, it seems as though my request for file-mover rights (which was just accepted), inspired you, lol ;) However, correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't find any requests for rename in your edit history. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

What; I have made, like five. I'll look. TBrandley 02:42, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bzweebl (talk • contribs) 17:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Arrested Development/archive1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Wikipedical (talk) 21:13, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Kings XI Punjab cricketers/archive1.
Message added 13:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thine Antique Pen 13:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Casting Crowns/archive1.
Message added 17:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Toa Nidhiki05 17:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Sunil Gavaskar/archive1.
Message added 18:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 18:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Done

With the copyedit, great work on the article! Mark Arsten (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I can't take much credit though. Grapple did most of the work. But, I still did a bit. Ha. Cheers, TBrandley 02:22, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Losing My Religion

Hey TBrandley! I don't know if you noticed but BlueMoonset has added many comments on the review you started while you were away. Joey and me tried to address some of them but we, or at least I, don't know how to fix the issues BlueMoonset has found on the lead and reception. So would you mind to give your opinion on the comments BlueMoonsethas left and possibly tell if the changes he/she suggest are necessary? Also, since the article has seen many changes, you might have to re-read the whole article ;) Thanks, Sofffie7 (talk) 19:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

I got almost every issue; excluding those not part of the good article criteria. If you could take a look to see if you can pass it, that'd be great. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 05:48, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Peter Sellers FLC

Hi TBrandley. Firstly, hearty congratulations on your success with "Say Hello to My Little Friend"; an article which I was proud to help promote. Secondly, I wondered if you could take a look at Peter Sellers on stage, radio, screen and record as it is currently up for featured list consideration. It's senior article, Peter Sellers, has just been awarded FA status, and my co-nom and I are now attempting to give this list the same treatment (much as I did with Dan Leno). I would be obliged if you could look in, and we would greatfully recieve any comments you may have to offer. All the best! -- Cassianto^Talk 00:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Wow, one lucky person. FLC is my roommate. I'll for sure leave some comments. TBrandley 02:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Say Hello to My Little Friend copyedit

Hi you requested that you wanted Say Hello to My Little Friend to be copyedited by the GOCE, because "that you want it to be FA status" Well that article is FA status and FA status dictates that it should be left as is unless new information comes up. So I am just wondering if you still want it copyedited even though it is at FA status? Obtund^Talk 01:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh, sorry; I forgot to remove it from the list. I will do that now. Thanks, TBrandley 01:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

No problem. Obtund^Talk 01:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Wow, congrats on FA status! ("Say Hello to My Little Friend") --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:55, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm now working on getting "Nightswimming" up to FA status now, also. Cheers, TBrandley 15:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Awake and more

Hey! Any progress on getting Awake re-nominated early? Also, I don't know if you saw, but List of Grey's Anatomy episodes was promoted and I applied for a triple crown! :-) Do a quick creation and DYK, and you'll qualify! Also, did you see Sophie's message above regarding the review of LMR? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:50, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Yep, I going to go on it now. I can't get it re-nominated, the FA director said that exceptions are only for articles with little/no feedback at all. He told me to wait two weeks, GrahamColm. Thanks, I'll get on that. TBrandley 03:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. That's unfortunate about Awake. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

• Op-ed: Wikimedians are rightfully wary

• News and notes: Core content competition in full swing; Wikinews fork taken offline

• In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia

• Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.

• Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension

• WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 09:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Read asap

Please stop changing everything. The template is fine as is. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

I was just copying of off Template:TXF episodes, okay, fair enough. Cheers, TBrandley 18:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

I was thinking of Template:Lost episodes. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The M.A.G.I.C. Barnstar
		You have been awarded the M.A.G.I.C. (Meredith, Alex, George, Izzie, Cristina) barnstar, in recognition of the truly excellent job you are doing as monitor of the WikiProject Grey's Anatomy administrative board. I never have to worry about vandalism/removal of content/addition of unsourced content, because you're always on top of it. Keep up the great work! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. Unique. No problem, to be honest, it's an easy job. Cheers, TBrandley 18:59, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

LMR GA review

Hi, can you take a look at the review page for LMR; all the issues have been addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I did a quick little copy-edit, and little a little note there. Cheers, TBrandley 20:20, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey, BlueMoonset added a comment yesterday and I replied to it so I think the article is now good to pass :) Sofffie7 (talk) 11:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nightswimming (Awake)

Hello! Your submission of Nightswimming (Awake) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 03:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

A further post is listed there. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 04:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you respond at the review page? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:57, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

MOS:TIME

Hi TBrandley. I saw your recent edit here, where you converted the text "9:00 p.m. Eastern/8:00 p.m." to "9:00 pm Eastern/8:00 pm", with the edit summary MOS:TIME. Just so you know, there is nothing wrong with using the periods. You might want to go back and re-read that guideline. Both pm and p.m. are completely acceptable. Happy editing! --Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks for letting me know. Guess, then, I thought it "had" to be "pm" rather "p.m.". I'll try. Cheers, TBrandley 01:31, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Flags

Hello, Brandley, I would like to ask something concerning the List of Armenian Olympic medalists. You said that the flags aren't necessary for the table, but as you can see in Ballon d'Or article (which is a featured list), the flags are included in the table. Shouldn't the flags be included at least for the countries? Yes, probably, it's not a good idea to put the flags in front of the games where they have been hosted, I understand that. --Yerevanci (talk) 18:11, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

It must of been missed on that FLC. I was just going by MOS:FLAG guidelines. TBrandley 02:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, it says the following: Flag icons may be relevant in some subject areas, where the subject actually represents that country, government, or nationality – such as military units, government officials, or national sports teams. Another lines states, Examples of acceptable exceptions would be military battle infoboxes templates and infoboxes that include international competitions, such as FIFA World Cup or the Olympic Games.

Now, I can't see any reason why the flags shouldn't be used there.--Yerevanci (talk) 23:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Wondering

Hi, I was just wondering why your user page bio varies between first and third person POVs. For example, almost all of it is written in the first POV, but lines like "Tate began editing on Wikipedia on November 9, 2011, [...]" and "TBrandley recently got his article, "Say Hello to My Little Friend", promoted to FA status, by awesome FA director, GrahamColm, on August 19, 2012, his first featured article." are in third person. Lol, just something I noticed. Personally, I think it looks better in the first person POV. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll fix that soon. Thanks! TBrandley 02:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Lily van Java/GA1

Replied there. Thanks for the review. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

• Ping? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:00, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry. Completely forget. Its passed now. Cheers, TBrandley 14:10, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

List of GA cast members

Hi, I want to nominate the above article for FL status, but I have a concern. The only way a reader can know what billing the actor/actress received a particular season is through the color key. I think that goes against MOS:DTT, but I don't know another way to convey that information besides coloring. Any thoughts? TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

I think you should use a color that blind people, etc. will be able to see. So, I think a color is a okay, but it depends on the color. See List of The Simpsons guest stars for a good example color. TBrandley 18:21, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Good point. In that case, the colors used are appropriate for colorblind people, per other FLs. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

alcatraz begin date in finland.

im finnish so i can tell you that it does not begin 22 march... "klo 22.30" simply means "at 10:30pm" not the date.

2.9. is 9.2. in american way. Thus it means 2 day of September... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:708:30:1040:DD83:DF8B:EED8:A4D4 (talk) 16:46, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:A Totally Fun Thing That Bart Will Never Do Again/GA1

Fixed your concerns. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ecpiandy. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Grey's Anatomy cast members/archive1.
Message added 15:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Alert

Only one more week and then you can renominate Awake! :-) That's your biggest goal, right? (I only assume that because it is my ultimate goal to get Grey's Anatomy featured). TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, for sure. That's my main goal. TBrandley 20:04, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Opinion wanted

Hey, I just redesigned my user page a bit. How does it look? I thought it was too crowded to have all my article contribs spread out, so I added hidden boxes. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Wow, looks good. Just a personal suggestion, but maybe instead the boxes should be aligned to the center or something. It's looks nice though. TBrandley 21:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Good idea! TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Satyamev Jayate (TV series)/GA1

Was wondering how this one was going, since it now has the dubious distinction of being the longest on hold of any GAN with Cora having been passed. Any chance of it being completed soon?

And, of course, no sooner did I type that than I noticed that a brand new Wikipedia account has made two edits, adding a new second paragraph to the Internet phenomenon section. It may be problematic: it seems to concentrate on Persistent Systems Ltd and its relation to the show and internet analysis, which leads one to believe it may be written by someone associated with that company. The edits were made today. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:27, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll look again, and add some more comments for now. Thanks. TBrandley 23:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Featured Article Age

What does it mean by it been promoted between 1 and 2 years ago? Does it mean that's how long ago it was made? Also, could I nominate, since I am a new user. Thank you. --Lucky102 (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Weekly Newsletter: August 27, 2012

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Newsletter: The Week of August 27, 2012

Hello members of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! We are sending out our weekly newsletter with updates about the project and tasks. Big apologies for the lack of the newsletter last week! What a busy two weeks it's been! We have several new achievements and updates to be announced! List of Grey's Anatomy episodes, developed by TRLIJC19 and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, is now a featured list! "Give Peace a Chance", written by TRLIJC19, was promoted to a featured article last night, after spending only 7 days in candidacy! "Losing My Religion" was listed as a good article last week, developed by Sofffie7, TRLIJC19, and Jonathan Harold Koszeghi. List of Grey's Anatomy cast members, developed by TRLIJC19, recently entered the process of featured list candidacy—we urge you to review the list here. Grey's Anatomy, developed by TRLIJC19, and Grey's Anatomy (season 3), developed by Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, are still in the preparations for featured article candidacy. There are many things to be done for the project, in an attempt to exemplify its best work. Below is a list of tasks, and guidelines:

Tasks and Gudelines

Please try to follow these tasks to the best of your abilities. As with any guideline, there may be exceptions, so use common sense when applying them. Character Pages Ensure that each character page has this section order: LEAD (and appropriate infobox) Storylines Development Casting and creation Characterization Reception References External links Shorten character storylines, using {{Cite episode}} to reference episodes, and break down season sub-section headers into just one section, "Storylines". Model pages after Sadie Harris, Callie Torres, Lexie Grey, Owen Hunt, Izzie Stevens, Erica Hahn, Arizona Robbins, and Meredith Grey Main Page (Grey's Anatomy) Keep an eye out for vandalism, as that tends to occur at that page. General Many users and IPs have been erasing "surgical resident" from fifth year residents characters' occupations in infoboxes and at List of Grey's Anatomy characters. This should all be held off until more info is given on their current occupation in the season premiere. Revert if you see this, and if it's persistent; warn users. Some IPs/Users have been changing Lexie Grey's article as well as Callie Torres, going against MOS. Revert if you see this, and try to explain to the IP/User why this is wrong.

Weekly Initiative!
The weekly initiative this week is to search the internet, and find season 6 reviews to add to Grey's Anatomy. Search through google archives, and news websites, to find reviews that talk about season 6 in entirety. Please make sure the reviews you find come from a highly reliable source such as a major news site, or a well-known magazine. If you find some reviews, please post them on the talk page of Grey's Anatomy, where they will be evaluated for quality. If you find a suitable review, that fits the criteria we are looking for, you will be awarded a barnstar! Take part in this initiative, have fun searching for reviews, feel proud after the review you find is added to the main article, and be rewarded with barnstars! Help make a difference and get started! Furthermore, if you notice that any user has participated in any weekly initiative and was not rewarded, give them a barnstar ASAP!

Have fun, and don't forget to only look at renowned sites! We hope to see several season 6 reviews posted on the talk page soon!

--The community of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy (Written by project coordinator TRLIJC19)

Windows 7

Would you like some help with your review on Windows 7? If so just zap me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Obtund^Talk 05:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs			Cleanup
	List of Lavender Castle episodes			Seattle Grace: Message of Hope
	KinoTV			Grey's Anatomy (season 8)
	Smash (Martin Solveig album)			List of Holly episodes
	Sheila Larken		Merge
	Neuroblast			Loon
	R. W. Goodwin			Foot
	TT69			Mobbed
	List of Signing Time! episodes		Add sources
	Leonard Chang			Tom Braidwood
	Panicale			The X-Files: Original Motion Picture Score
	Rebecca Toolan			How I Met Your Mother (season 5)
	Vince Gilligan		Wikify
	Living in Your Car			Neighborsgo
	Chris Owens (actor)			DTV (Moldovan TV channel)
	Method & Red			List of Isa TKM episodes
	Bruce Harwood		Expand
	Weaponology			History of antisemitism
	Peace of Mind (Boston song)			Colonist (The X-Files)
	The X-Files: Unrestricted Access			Blue Heelers (season 7)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:58, 28 August 2012 (UTC)