User talk:David Lipson

A tag has been placed on OO17, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 23:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:OO17logo copy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OO17logo copy.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

OO17

A tag has been placed on OO17, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain web site, blog, forum, or other community of web users that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:OO17. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. _SUBWAYguy 05:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:OO17duo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OO17duo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

0017

I'm sorry but 0017 fail WP:CORP, the notability guidlines for companies and groups. You tube fails WP:RS and therefore can not show notability for the company. The article will always get deleted RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 14:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OO17, again

Please stop creating articles that have been continuously speedily deleted. Doing so can be considered vandalism, and could result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia in the future. --Адам12901 ^Talk 19:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:

Place {{hangon}} on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
Make your case on the article's talk page.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. _SUBWAYguy 19:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]