Jump to content

User talk:Camilear

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Camilear! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Ipigott (talk) 10:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red

[edit]

Hi there, Camilear, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a short biography and look forward to many more. In this connection, you should find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--~~

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Ipigott (talk) 10:30, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauli (disambiguation) has been accepted

[edit]
Mauli (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 10:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: HornBlasters

[edit]

Hello Camilear, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of HornBlasters, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This version of the article is not substantially identical to the deleted version. You are welcome to WP:PROD the article instead if you feel it would be an uncontroversial deletion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 18:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for informing.Ā :) Hope I am not doing anything wrong. Camilear (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Previous accounts

[edit]

Camilear, I see that you are familiar with Wikipedia policies, article creation and speedy deletions. Can you please let me know if you have used other accounts before this one? JeraxmoirašŸ‰ (talk) 19:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira:, see this. There is also a list of more experienced editors associated with the SPI that was emailed a few weeks ago. I'd be curious about your opinion based on the publicly disclosed evidence. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeraxmoira, You can goahed with CU, but as i can say there is no comparison me and other three user ids, I just Draftify the page Draft:Amar Nayak, because that pages just have three references and that are not enough, and regarding my previous ID, This is my previous ID User:Cameron11598, But unfortunatly I loss the password and the device from which i access this account. Camilear (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cameron11598 is not Indian. If you were Cameron11598, you would have indicated that on your user page, but you didnā€™t. JeraxmoirašŸ‰ (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
He is my cousin, he is studying out of india, so when ever i am going to out if india i user that user id, Right now i am india, I am free so i just registered new account for just doing work in free time, Else i told you befor there is no comperision between me and other three, Even you need to see that, all three user are doing edits related to muslim religion (Pakistan), and I am Hindu, else whatever. Thank you for your time Good night. Camilear (talk) 19:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didnt want to indicate, my cousins work in my user page, I have much experience of wikipedia and ability to take, user excess leve which he already have. Camilear (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So you lied and stated that was your account. Is that correct? --CNMall41 (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, editing behaviors (such as you moving pages to draft in an attempt to see like you are fighting UPE) is similar to editing behavior of the SOCK farm mentioned in the link above. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didnt lied. Camilear (talk) 20:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CNMall41, If someone is doing edits, it doesnt mean he/she is sock. Camilear (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your words - "This is my previous ID User:Cameron11598" - Also your words - "He is my cousin, he is studying out of india" - Can you clarify how this is not a lie?--CNMall41 (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thats true, This my previous ID, This Id was user by me and my cousin, my cousin is studying in abroad, so when ever i visit the abroad I like to use his User ID from his device, because he was not using as much as he is studying, so after long time he change the device without informing me, then due to that right now we dont have longun access to that account, and one thing you all are just suspecting me because I just draftify the page which was created my other user and that users are belong as sock, I dont have to explain my what i did, May be CU team will check it from thir side, and if they thing I am part of that three account then they can block, but as per my edit history, I have not done anything wrong. Thank you. 03:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC) Camilear (talk) 03:13, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

Hello Camilear. I just ran across a note from you on another user's page, and i'd like to point out that your signature is quite difficult to read. Have you taken a look at WP:SIGNATURES, especially the WP:SIGAPP section? There is some good information there about colours and so on which i suspect you could benefit from. You can also find information at MOS:COLOUR. Thanks in advance for taking a look at this ~ LindsayHello 21:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@LindsayH, Sure I will check and will change my signature as soon as possible. Camilear (talk) 03:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I made some changes to your article Alisha Parveen. Please correct me if I was wrong. Mycrushrajveer (talk) 07:04, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mycrushrajveer Kindly dont add awards paragraph for this page, she didnt reveived any awards yet, so no need to create seperate paragraph for the awards. Thank you. Camilear (talk) 07:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Navina (disambiguation) has been accepted

[edit]
Navina (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 17:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samriddhi (disambiguation) has been accepted

[edit]
Samriddhi (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 17:10, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Blacose per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunuraju. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
GirthĀ Summit (blether) 11:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]