User talk:Arian geek

February 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Greater Khorasan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 20:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

→Noted. Sorry I failed to cite the sources as not all of my changes were "personally motivated" and some of it was just alphabetical ordering. The boundaries of Khorasan were based of personal knowledge and I understand your point.

Arian geek (talk) 23:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Tajiks. Wario-Man (talk) 21:07, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain how I violated the "neutral point of view policy". I did not insert any opinions, only facts. If anything it seems like you have an innate bias on how you want to categorize and define Tajiks (Eastern Persians). Arian geek (talk) 21:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]