User talk:Craftyminion/I'm not proud: Difference between revisions
Craftyminion (talk | contribs) →My RFA...: collapse |
→CRAFTY GO FUCK YOURSELF: new section Tag: possible vandalism |
||
Line 373: | Line 373: | ||
:You're more than welcome. :) [[User:Craftyminion|Crafty]] ([[User talk:Craftyminion#top|talk]]) 06:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
:You're more than welcome. :) [[User:Craftyminion|Crafty]] ([[User talk:Craftyminion#top|talk]]) 06:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC) |
||
== CRAFTY GO FUCK YOURSELF == |
|||
GO FUCK YOURSELF |
Revision as of 22:03, 9 November 2009
This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Craftyminion/I%27m_not_proud. |
Bad Crafty!
In Which Crafty is Scolded for Using the Eff Word in an AfD
|
---|
Crafty, I was alerted to this comment of yours. Since I unblocked you, I take some responsibility for your subsequent behavior, and I don't want to see foul language. Now, I think you're kidding around, but be careful ... not everyone gets it that way, and an AfD can be fraught enough without needlessly raising the temperature. Daniel Case (talk) 11:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Guitarherochristopher
Vale GHC |
---|
Re this, I'd already requested speedy per g11. → ROUX ₪ 03:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
← You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din. Seriously, I admire the effort you're taking with this kid. I suspect part of what he likes is the attention he gets here and that until that's been cut off his behaviour will continue. I shake my lucky eight-ball and all I can see in GHC's future is the Wiki-Shitcan. Crafty (talk) 03:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
|
Apparent edit conflict at WT:AC/N
In Which Franamax and Crafty Sort Shit Out |
---|
Hi Crafty, could I have your urgent attention to this edit I've made. It looked like you'd inadvertently edit conflicted with Will Beback's post and I was trying to fix things up. But edits are proceeding apace there, my bad for assuming I had even a few seconds to get it all straight! Anyway, I just want to be sure that you know that your comment is currently hovering out in space somewhere, and I was real honest trying to sort it out but it may be a little messed up now! :( Franamax (talk) 06:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Josef Rudolf Zavrtal
Mutual Appreciation |
---|
You're welcome. I perfectly agree with your assessment of the situation. I hope my comments to Porch will be well received. I know my comments were a bit stern (not too much I hope), but I felt that I needed to be pretty serious given the potential negative implications of his actions. Biting new editors discourages them from staying and continuing to contribute to the project. Users like Voodoobug can potentially be higly productive good editors in the future if we treat them well and help them to be better wikipedians.Plumadesabiduría (talk) 02:21, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Re: User:Toothpicks
Toofpiks! |
---|
|
HYPERSPIN - notability
You Spin Me Right Round Baby |
---|
thanks for reviewing my article. I am confused. are youtube videos of the software being used in peoples homes and in arcade cabinets not notable? please give specifics. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefoxian (talk • contribs) 21:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Your note
In Which Samir Errs |
---|
Not sure what your point is? The dude was complaining about receiving a templated message (albeit with nasty language) and you replied with another template (complaining about his language)? Good intentions -- yes. Good way to communicate it -- no. -- Samir 00:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Haha!
In Which a Drunken Frat Boy Hits on Crafty |
---|
Ok! But check this video out, I'm dieing! YouTube video — Preceding unsigned comment added by A3RO (talk • contribs) 14:37, October 13, 2009 (UTC)
|
ANI
ANI blather
|
---|
I'm not sure I understand this (rather aggressive) comment you've made. I never endorsed John Carter's protection of his talk page, and indeed, I agree that it was inappropriate. But the dispute was largely a result of UnitAnode's actions, hence my initial post. –Juliancolton | Talk 03:01, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
|
My RFA...
In Which a Candidate Sucks Up |
---|
.. Thanq for participating in my RFA. While I sincerely value your choice, I just felt like letting you know that I have been offered to nominate at RFA many a times earlier, which I had thankfully declined till now. Having said that, I am looking forward to co-operate and collabrate with you on wikipedia regardless of the outcome of the RFA.Feel free to let me if I can help you in any way on wikipedia/ Thanks again. Have a gr8 day ..-- Tinu Cherian - 14:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC) |
Qwiggalo
In Which Crafty's Nemesis is Unmasked |
---|
Qwiggalo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) It is my belief that the user you just called a vandal is nothing more than a harassment SPA, aimed at harassing you, as, they have not edited any articles you have, and therefore, there is no other way they could have found your page.— Dædαlus Contribs 08:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
|
DRV:Colorado ballon incident
That Damned Balloon Kid |
---|
I didn't get a chance to chime in at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 18#Colorado balloon incident (closed) but if I did, I would've endorsed the closure as a stellar example of following the processes and procedures on this page. Yes, it was out of process, and yes, by doing this he opened himself up to being burned at the stake for making a mistake. However, his actions were approved resoundingly by acclaimantion, both in the DRV and on his talk page with the barnstar and follow-on endorsements of the barnstar. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:28, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Allied Artists Pictures Corporation DOES still exist, Help Request =
Wordsoup
|
---|
|
Bastard
In Which Crafty Survives an Encounter With a Crackpot |
---|
Crafty just said I could post this on his talk page. Cheers :)ChinaUpdater (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hey, is that a Dore print in the image in the previous section?ChinaUpdater (talk) 20:42, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Be careful what you are reverting......
In Which Crafty and Tim are Thwarted by a Bot |
---|
[6]. Tim Song (talk) 04:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Noleander
In Which a Fraught Matter is Discussed in a Civil Fashion |
---|
Your comment means a lot to me. When I first saw the two articles I felt like just quiting - I can't be a part of a project that gives a soap-box to anti-Semites. I am gratified many hav voted to delete his articles but still like you disappointed by the apparently large numbers of people who see anti-Semisism as just another "point of view" we have to represent. I don't know what more tio di, i wish we had more editors like you around! Slrubenstein | Talk 22:39, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks again. One admin closed down the AfD on "misuse of anti-Semitic accusations" - and then DGG (an editor for whom I usually have the utmost respect) left this comment [7] Appropriate or not, his insisting that his view of those with whom he disagrees - e.g. me - is the correct view is a real refusal to assume good faith. I am sure that his vote to keep the article was made in good faith. Why can't my vote to delete it be in good faith? I don't think DGG is an anti-Semite but I think this is one example of how good Wikipedians in good faith can really misread the issue. But I havde to admit, it is th implied refusal to assume good faith on my part that really gnaws at me .... Slrubenstein | Talk 10:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I recognise that extremists, fanatics and bigots of many kinds - Christian Right, Neo-Nazis, Islamic extremists, Anti-Zionists - wish to talk up the idea of Jewish control of Hollywood/the Media/the World, but I still hold that the topic of 'Jews and Hollywood' is notable and can be written about neutrally, in particular due to the existence of mainstream sources covering the topic in depth. Does this make you think that I am an antisemite? I'm not insistent on the need for an article on Jews and Hollywood, but there is certainly room in Antisemitic canard for material on the accusation, and in American Jews for content about the actual history of Jewish people in the US film industry. The deletion review was opened due to the closer failing to give a rationale for their decision on a long and complex debate, not because Equazcion couldn't face losing the argument. If it did actually make you feel sick, you may need to find ways to avoid becoming too emotionally invested in debates on Wikipedia. I'd not have opened the deletion review myself - I took my complaint directly to Coffee to be met with intransigence - but it is really a 'point of order' rather than a genuine attempt to overturn the result. We need to be able to write and discuss articles on sensitive topics without accusing each other of racism without good evidence, even though there will be some bona fide racists around. Race and crime in the United States is another article where editors need to be robust without mudslinging. I recently came across the poorly written Immigrant criminality, which is currently a gift to anti-immigration campaigners, but I'd not call the author User:Dbachmann a racist: but what if such an article was about "Jewish criminality"? Fences&Windows 01:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Using templates
In Which Crafty Counsels a Lost Soul |
---|
Ok, so i dont get into trouble again, who CAN I template?Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:03, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Could you please explain...
In Which Crafty Remains Inscrutable |
---|
I responded to your last question of me. Of course you are not obliged to further explain yourself. But I would be grateful if you tried. Geo Swan (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
|
Thank you
— Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 23:36, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not at all. :) Crafty (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Prod2
May I point your attention to the documentation of Template:Prod2. It say very clearly
Please DO NOT subst: this template! |
Debresser (talk) 10:40, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yikes! I didn't realise. Thank you for letting me know. I hopes I didn't break teh intahwebz! Crafty (talk) 18:23, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Asshole
You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.27.179.218 (talk • contribs) 07:10, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
- I know. Now kiss me, you fool! :) Crafty (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
November 2009
The Barnstar of Good Humor | ||
To say the least, your userpage and talk page made me roll on the floor laughing. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 23:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC) |
And thus, you will be wikistalked (just reading your edits, not being a dick), as after a long day your edits will provide me with something to make the day better. Have a good one! TheWeakWilled (T * G) 23:13, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oooh! Bling! Ta, fanx. :) Crafty (talk) 23:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
User page
Your user page is hilarious. I'm guessing it's all true? — Rlevse • Talk • 23:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ask Tan. Check mah block log. Review the history. Every word is true and since truth will out, I figured it would be easier to wear the Scarlet Letter and be damned. :) Crafty (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- ROFL. I checked your block log before I made the post. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
- Your user page is truly is hilarious. I know it is true! I'm half expecting to see you show up in my class one day. After being beaten to a bloody pulp on Sunday, reading your talk page cheered me up. I doubt you and I should ever be an admin ;) until our next meeting, Happy Editing, - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
- ROFL. I checked your block log before I made the post. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Retailing/Noticeboard
Hate to be a Grammar nazi, but this one bugs me more than anything else. "It's" = "It is." You meant "its," as in "belonging to it." Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 04:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- I know, I just ignore the rule because it's' bulls'hit and I love getti'ng a rise out of Language Fuss Pot's. I'll put a'postrophe's wherever I wan't. But thanks for the Peeve-o-Gram, its made today worthwhile. Crafty (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
- And a big thumb's up fo'r you're witty respon'se. Ten Pound Hammer, hi's otter's and a clue-bat • (Many otter's • One bat • One ham'mer) 16:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Alternative HIV viewpoints
Please discuss edits which remove valid sources on the talk page prior to editing. This is a POV article. The article is supposed to reflect the rationale behind the scientific dissent of HIV, not prove that HIV doesn't exits, or that it doesn't cause AIDS. Deleting references is not the way to improve an article. Neuromancer 03:33, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- How about we try it this way, why don't you make a case for the inclusion of those particular "references" on the article talk page? It's not only your references that are the problem, but the POV language you're using to contextualise them, eg "clandestine" etc etc. Crafty (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Then edit the language. That's fine. Don't delete a reference. Neuromancer 03:38, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Did you log out to revert that edit? I think you did. That's naughty and a form of sock-puppetry, you know. :) Crafty (talk) 03:40, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- I reviewed that edit myself, and knowing my IP, I can assure you that it did not come from me. Have an admin run a check user if you don't believe me. Neuromancer 04:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- No, no, it's fine. I'm happy to take your word for it. :) Crafty (talk) 04:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Here's my IP... I logged out to post this comment. 24.251.114.169 (talk) 04:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Now now, there's no need to go showing me your private bits. As I said, I'm happy to take your word for it. :) Crafty (talk) 04:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Didn't know you were English... Neuromancer 04:17, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not. Crafty (talk) 04:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well then I must give you props for the proper uses of the colloquialisms of that region. Neuromancer 04:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Only props? Not mad props? Ah well, at least I still have something to strive for. Crafty (talk) 04:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- We must all strive for something. When we reach the point of knowing everything, we know nothing... Though there may be more constructive things in life than striving to gain my "mad props." Neuromancer 04:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
(unindent) Just on a whim, I checked. Those two IPs are within 25 miles of each other. FYI. JoeSmack Talk 20:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. Neuro was a bit quick to drop trou and wave his IPeeny at me. Crafty (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for the revert on my user page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:09, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're more than welcome. :) Crafty (talk) 06:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
CRAFTY GO FUCK YOURSELF
GO FUCK YOURSELF