User talk:Brianann MacAmhlaidh: Difference between revisions
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 03 July 2013: new section |
→stop: new section |
||
Line 1,386: | Line 1,386: | ||
</div> |
</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0563 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0563 --> |
||
== stop == |
|||
im sick of people undoing my edits . if people do that i will vandalise . |
Revision as of 17:09, 5 July 2013
This is Brianann MacAmhlaidh's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
File:Rögnvaldr Guðrøðarson (Ireland map).png
Hi, I just noticed the file you created for Rögnvaldr Guðrøðarson. I was wondering whether Porchester is "Portchester"? Regards Newm30 (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was wondering why "Porchester" was redlinked (I'll redirect it now). At the time, it never dawned on me that "Porchester Castle" redirected to "Portchester Castle".--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:58, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
William Wallace
Hello Brianann MacAmhlaidh it is true that William Wallace's arms aren't known but the coat of arms there represents the arms later associated with the wallace clan it could be that Wallace adopted these or similar arms as guardian of Scotland. Or they could be a later one associated with William Wallace. --Cormag100 (talk) 14:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Origins
I've dropped an essay into Wikipedia:WikiProject Scottish Islands/Origins of the Uí Ímair and the Earls of Orkney and your comments/edits are more than welcome. Some of the reasons it is not (yet) an article are explained on the talk page - I also think it needs some input from those much more familiar with the relevant periods of Norse and Irish history than I am. Ben MacDui 15:44, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Alexander Og MacDonald,
Hi, I have just seen the file you uploaded (scan of letter to Edward I) signed by Alexander Og MacDonald. I also noticed the link to your draft page. I was curious as Alasdair Mòr was also killed in battle against Alexander of Argyll in 1299. Do you know of any reference to a battle, as it must have been noteworthy with the deaths of two important figures at the time? Regards Newm30 (talk) 03:44, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi. That battle is what my eye too. The Clan Donald historians (used in Alasdair Mor's article) figured it was Alasdair Mor who was slain in 1299, but more recent scholars like R.A. McDonald (1997) and David Sellar (2000) think it was Alexander Og. Although Sean Duffy thinks (or thought in 1991 atleast) that it was Alasdair Mor. Duffy edited a book on this period in 2007 - The World of the Galloglass - There must be some mention about this event in that book, or some note on the identity of the particular 'Alexander' killed. One of contributors of that book is Kenneth Nicholls, and I've seen him note in elsewhere that he regards Alexander Og to have been slain in about 1299 (so I assume it must have been that battle), and also to have been the founder of the main MacDonald gallowglass lineages. From reading McDonald and Sellar, it makes sense to me if it was Alexander Og who was slain - he was the leading MacDonald of his time, he was warring with Alexander MacDougall beforehand, he disappears from contemporary sources afterwards, and by 1301 his brother Angus Og bore the designation 'of Islay' which shows that he had by then succeeded to the leadership of the family. So I think that the current understanding is that it was Alexander Og and not Alasdair Mor. If you're interested I could email you two things by McDonald and Sellar; just send me an email and I'll reply back with them.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
Balfron
Please see the Balfron talk page, which you recently edited. Shipsview (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
Arms of William Wallace
Dear Brianann MacAmhlaidh I uploaded an image of the seal which was sent to lubeck by William Wallace please have a look at the the Wallace coat of arms and the second image of wallace's seal
both display a lion (and it is highly possible that Wallace as guardian adopted a Lion as part of his Arms .
Buaidh no Bàs
--Cormag100 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- That's ok. I don't dispute that he might have had a coat of arms with a lion on it, the fact is no one knows what he or his family bore for heraldry. Just don't add attributed arms into infoboxes. It's misleading. That particular coat of arms was never borne by William Wallace. The heraldry borne by modern chiefs of the name doesn't necessarily equate to the heraldry borne by figures in the 13th century. There's a good book of Scottish heraldry somewhat viewable on GoogleBooks - Scotland's historic heraldry by Bruce McAndrew. It mentions that the earliest heraldry for Wallaces of Elderslie dates to the younger son of a man who flourished in the tail-end of the 14th century. His arms were different.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry to butt in here, but the above image is correct for use. See here: [1] Brendandh (talk) 12:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- That's ok. The Lubeck seal has two sides. That particular side actually shows the Royal Arms of Scotland, which appears on other seals of the guardians (here's a better preserved example of one such seal [2]). It's the other side of the Lubeck seal which is important in regards to Wallace [3]. It shows a bow and arrow and contains a legend which translates as 'William son of Alan Wallace'.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Holmes (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
William Wallace heraldic arms
File:William WallaceCoat of arms.jpg
Hi. I uploaded this blazon I made which represents William Wallace's arms according to the seal attached to the Lubeck letter. There was a slight problem, it is to small and takes up to much space perhaps you could help by corping them and since i can't anymore "reuploading" them as a blazon !!
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cormag100 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- You'll need a program that can handle SVGs to work with most of the coats of arms on Wikipedia. Try Inkscape. Download any SVG coat of arms and load it in that program and you'll be all set to customise it. You can search the Commons for hundreds of SVG charges.
- Cormag100, there's no historical coat of arms for William Wallace. You can't just take an element from a seal, add some colour and whatnot, and put it on a shield and present it as a coat of arms. It doesn't work that way. If you want to create some images for Wikipedia, try and find a good book that gives the specific blazon for an individual's coat of arms, and follow that blazon to create the image. The McAndrew book I mentioned before is good because it gives the specific source for each mentioned coat of arms (usually a medieval armorial of some sort). McAndrew analysed the 900+ known seals of the Ragman Roll and found that most were non-heraldic. The 'Wallace' seals on that roll contain various things: one had a fleur-de-lis, another a curlew, and another a cross paty. So the elements on an individual's seal don't necessarily have anything to do with what is on his coat of arms.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you !! I downloaded the program and I've got to admit it's great but I can't combine two images or put them on the same window, do you know how cause if it were known to me I could work more effectively. Do you mind just explaining it to me in just a few words ? Thanks!! --Cormag100 (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- There's a wikiproject on the Commons about heraldry and making coats of arms: WikiProject Heraldry. There's some help over there. I'll walk you through an easy one. Pretend you found a blazon that reads: Gules, a wyvren Or (a red shield, with a yellow wyvren on it). Pick the first red shield from this category, download it and open it with Inkscape. Then pick the last dragon from this category, download it and click 'file', then choose 'import', and import the wyvren you just downloaded. Now click 'layer', then choose 'layers', and you'll see on the right hand side a menu with a list of layers (which happen to be written in French). Note that you can't centre or move the dragon around, that's because it happens to be on a layer that's locked. Notice how the listed layers have little pictures of locks beside them, and that some of them are closed while others are open? - unlock them all and you'll notice you can move your dragon around. One of the layers is shaded and gives the shield some depth (makes it appear 3D somewhat). You'll need to keep all the charges below that layer to make the coat of arms look good. Select the dragon, click 'edit', and choose 'cut' (or just select the dragon and CTRL-X). Now click on one of the layers named 'meubles' (this is the layer just below the one with the 3D shading), now click 'edit', and choose 'paste' (or just CTRL-V), and your dragon will be on that layer. Now lock all the layers except 'meubles' (just for safety), and manually centre your dragon onto the shield and resize it or whatever. You can important another charge now too. That's it. Save as SVG, and you'll have a nice coat of arms.
- To centre things precisely there's a special way to do that, it's a bit trickier. First make sure you've got all the layers locked except the one you've got the dragon on (for safety). See the first line of icons under the top text-menu? See the one that looks like a 'T' that's pretty far to the right? The third one to the right of that (looks like a bar-graph) opens up a menu to centre things. Select your dragon, now look back at that centreing menu you just opened, click the third icon (if you hover your mouse over it it should say something like 'center objects horizontally'. Click that icon a couple times and your dragon should be perfectly centered (horizontally) on the shield.
- The more time you spend in the program, the easier it is to understand.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Brianann MacAmhlaidh you've been extremely helpful thank you very much (I'll have to think of some special award for you)
just one more question: I couldnae crop the pictures and a i didn't find an instruction of how to do so.
Anyway thanks again you've been a great help!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cormag100 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/BoNM_-_Scotland_Hires.png)
Brianann MacAmhlaidh!
awarded this Scottish Barnstar of National Merit, for his tireless help and selfless furthering of the presence of Scotland and it's heraldry on Wikipedia.
Tapadh leibh!
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Icons-flag-gb-sct.png)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/6/66/Icons-flag-gb-sct.png)
hope you like it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cormag100 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC) --Cormag100 (talk) 20:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- To crop, select your image or a border you've made, click 'file', choose 'document properties', and then 'fit page to selection'.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
Earldom of Ness
Sorry to bother you again, but slightly troubled by the sudden appearance of the Earldom of Ness in the Clan MacNeacail article, and even more so by the fact that the "Earldom" also now has its own article and threatens to take root more generally on Wikipedia. 45ossington (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- OK thanks. I'm going to nominate it for deletion. Sellar would have noted a royal charter or an 'earldom'.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. When you recently edited Richard, Bishop of the Isles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Council of Lyons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
Magnus & Mastermind
I hope this was genuinely helpful and will make it easier for the GA reviewer - it is approaching FAC class in my view. As I've started I'd like to finish with a bonus question. Apparently Ailean mac Ruaidhri "possessed the North Isles of the Uists, and Benbecula." Do you know who was his overlord at the time? Good luck with Magnus. Ben MacDui 20:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for that, and the review certainly helped. I'm not sure about the MacRuairis. I suppose after Dubhgall's Norwegian-departure/death, Ailean must have taken over the MacRuairi lands and recognised Alexander III's authority. I think it's uncertain when or how Uist fell into possession of the MacRuairis. Duncan and Brown say in Argyll and the Isles (p205) that Uist, Barra, and Harris are known to have been MacRuairi possessions in the 14th century, but beforehand it is uncertain. Sellar in Hebridean Sea kings (p196) says it is reasonable to assume they held Uist and Barra before 1266. McDonald's map, which I followed, allots Uist and Barra to the MacRuairis of c1266.
- King John's parliament of 1293 made the Earl of Ross sheriff lands including Uist; but in the years between 1264 and that parliament, the King of Scots appears to have given Alexander of Argyll authority over Kintyre, Argyll, and Lewis - so basically the whole region. See Duncan and Brown (p217), and McDonald Kingdom of the Isles (p132-133) for Alexander these lands.
- I just finished reading GWS Barrow's Robert Bruce, and Christiana's brother Lachlan seems to have been a really interesting character. Battling people left, right, and centre. Escaping capture from MacDonald, to be outfitted by MacDougall with 'massive war galleys'. Allotted lands by the Earl of Ross, but then refusing to hand over their revenues with the earl complaining to King Edward that Lachlan is such a high and mighty lord, he will not answer to anybody except under great force or fear of you'. Barrow sums him up: "A shadowy figure, Lachlan flits in and out of the record of the Anglo-Scortish war, always in the background, always a troublemaker. He defied in turn and with impunity King John, King Edward I, the Guardians and the earl of Ross. In his own esteem he may well have ranked as a king of the Isles, after the time-honoured style of the Gaidhealtachd. At last, in 1306, he appeared before the English king at Ebchester in County Durham to petition for the lands (probably in the west) of Patrick Graham. Soon afterwards he disappears from history, surely regretted by no one save his own followers".--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting - as you rightly suspect I am drawn to these obscure characters for some reason. Probably worth an article in due course, although the antics of some of the male MacRuari's seem to have every bit as venal as their "psychopathic Crovan dynasty" kin. Ben MacDui 08:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
John de Vesci
Hi, thought you might be interested in the stub I have just created on John de Vesci. I have seen him referenced as Baron Alnwick or Lord Alnwick. His brother William de Vesci was a contender for the King of Scotland. Regards Newm30 (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Nicely done. I've added it to my watchlist.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
I have just created an article on his brother William de Vesci (d.1297) Regards Newm30 (talk) 01:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Do you know what side William's illegitimate son William de Vescy of Kildare fought on during the Battle of Bannockburn? Regards Newm30 (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- The English side, per ODNB. McAndrew's Historic Heraldry on GoogleBooks gives him the same arms as his father and uncle.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 05:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all your help. Very much appreciated. Regards Newm30 (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
Resource request
Hello,
I found that article you were looking for at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#History_Scotland_magazine. InverseHypercube (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for that. I'm reading through it right now.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. Feel free to ask me if you need anything else from History Scotland; I have access to the entire archive. InverseHypercube (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Diocese of the Isles
Hi, I left a reply on the talk page about your enquiry about Rathlin Island. I believe that Rathlin belonged to the Diocese of Connor. Another question I have is this article is about the Diocese of the Isles, however refers to Sodor in the article, why is this there? I am aware of the old Diocese of Sodor and Man. Regards Newm30 (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for that on Rathlin Island. About the diocese, I think that in this case, the terms "Sodor" and "Isles" are in essence the same word, both refer to what the Norwegians called the "southern isles". In the late 14th century, during the Western Schism (see map in this article), the diocese split apart into a Scottish-aligned diocese and a Manx/English-aligned diocese. The Scottish-controlled Hebrides sided with the Avignon papacy, and the English-controlled Isle of Man sided with the Roman papacy. See the first note in John Dongan (where both dioceses are contemporaneously called "Sodor"). So beforehand they were one and the same - the Diocese of Suðreyjar/Sodorensis/Sodor/the Isles/whatever. --Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Was the Diocese of the Isles, known as the Diocese of Sodor in Scotland or Norway or both? Could I propose wording the lead: "The Diocese of the Isles, also known as the Diocese of Sodor, was a diocese created in 1387 by Avignon Pope Clement VII, by the division of the Diocese of Sodor and Man"?
- I don't think the post 14th century Scottish diocese had much if any contact with Norway. I'm not sure. It was sometimes known as 'Sodor' and 'Isles' in Scottish records at least (see here for example: "Johannes Sodorensis alias Insularum" - Bishop John Campbell of the 1500s; and see his namesake "Joannes electus Soderensis"). I don't think the article should treat it as a 14th century creation. I think both dioceses, the Manx and Scottish, are usually treated as just continuations (for example how that book in the previous link treats the Scottish one). The difference is that a Manx 'Sodor and Man' exists today.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- The diocese appears to have been controlled by the Archdiocese of Trondheim, Norway until 1472. Newm30 (talk) 21:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Sheriff of Ayr
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 21:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Dughall MacSuibhne
Just created a stub on Dughall MacSuibhne. It is interesting that he lost his lands in 1262. I have read that some fled to Ireland and set up a dynasty there, while others fled to England and held lands in Durnham. Could it be that he was forced to give up his titles due to his and his brother Maol Mhuire an Sparáin's position of supporting Hakon? The MacSween's were allegedly forced to serve with Hakon in 1263 and offer hostages as surety. Was there a 1262 Scots campaign or expedition into the Hebrides or Argyll? Newm30 (talk) 00:24, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- I think the peripheral families saw the writing on the wall long before Hakon's expedition. I think they would have dreaded the arrival of either Scots or Norwegian king. Maybe the MacSuibhne family were more stubborn than the other families. Or maybe they were merely made an example of - to show the stronger families of the region, Somerled's descendants, what would happen if they didn't sharpen-up and cooperate with the Scots. Unfortunately for Dughall, his family's lands lay right in the path of the Stewarts. I'm reading A. A. M. Duncan's The Making of Scotland right now and he thinks that, while Bute was gobbled up by the Stewarts by at least 1200, it is possible that it and Arran and the Cumbraes fell under their sway in the years after Somerled's fall. That's right on the doorstep of the MacSuibhne lordship, so I guess it makes sense that they would have felt the heat of the Scots first.
- G. W. S. Barrow says the contract between Dughall and Walter took place under 'uncertain circumstances'. Richard Oram thinks the contract was merely a fiction, and that the loss of the MacSuibhne lands was really due to a 'large-scale military operation'. Murchadh MacSuibhne was one of the men rewarded by Hakon afterwards (Hakon 'gave' him Arran). Since the Scots carved up his family's lands in the years previous, I guess that Murchadh was in a sense lucky that Hakon launched his expedition when he did! During the expedition, negotiations between the Scots and Norwegians centred around the ownership of Bute, Arran and the Cumbraes - but the Scots refused to budge. When Hakon sent the Islesmen up into Loch Lomond to ransack the Lennox district, Edward J. Cowan thinks it was also aimed at Walter's lands of Menteith (Cowan says that the Islesmen, which included Murchadh, 'knew exactly what they were doing' when they went off deep into the Lennox). Cowan compares Hakon's expedition aimed at Stewart power to Somerled's, the century previous - in both cases, the Stewarts weathered the storm. When the Norwegians left that was it; the Scots had the upper hand, and Murchadh's family had no future in Alexander III's kingdom. Someone should make movie about the this era.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- There was a Scots expedition into Skye in 1262 by Uilleam I, Earl of Ross, I suppose other expeditions by other nobles could have taken place at this time. Newm30 (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I have done some further reading and it would seem that magnates on behalf of the crown made inroads into the Hedrides and made the occupants swear fealty to the King of Scotland and they thereafter held their fiefs on behalf of the Scottish crown. It would appear that Aonghas Mór and Murchadh MacSuibhne still held their lordships and had given hostages to the King of Scotland in 1262. This would appear why Hakon ravaged parts of Kintyre to make Aonghas and Murchadh submit back to his overlordship. The two then were part of the sub-expedition to Loch Long, where they pillaged the lands of Maol Choluim I, Earl of Lennox. They even appear to have travelled as far as Stirling, before returning to their boats taking with them large numbers of cattle. Very interesting indeed. Newm30 (talk) 02:01, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- There was a Scots expedition into Skye in 1262 by Uilleam I, Earl of Ross, I suppose other expeditions by other nobles could have taken place at this time. Newm30 (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
I've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- As an aside - I noticed you made the maps for that article - would you be available for making a couple of maps for Middle Ages? Ealdgyth - Talk 00:22, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- OK, thanks Ealdgyth, I'll let you know went I ready for you. Sure I can work on some maps, I just need a good base-map to work with, and was lucky to find some good svg maps on the Commons. Here are some blank ones of Europe [4].--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 07:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. When you recently edited Battle of Largs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jura and Arran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
Battle of Largs
Great work on the improvements, so I think it better for me not to butt in, but let me know if there is anything I can do. I can always give it the once over when you think it is close to GA.--SabreBD (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I'll let you know. Thanks for the pointers on the talkpage.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 05:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
Note
I came across you requesting High Beam in resource exchange]. You can gain full and free access to the full articles by applying for it at Wikipedia:HighBeam/Applications .Through I have not interacted with you ,I can see you are one of the most tenured and senior editors. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:31, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the compliment. I think I've only needed something from HighBeam only once or twice so far. Other editors could probably put it to use more than me. I'd rather not hog it. I'll keep my eye on the page though, in case I do need more than a few things in the future. Thanks!--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
Talkback
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 06:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 06:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
A cup of tea for you!
![]() |
Thank you for your reponse to my query. Bearian (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2012 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
The Signpost: 20 August 2012
- In the news: American judges on citing Wikipedia
- Featured content: Enough for a week – but I'm damned if I see how the helican.
- Technology report: Lua onto test2wiki and news of a convention-al extension
- WikiProject report: Land of Calm and Contrast: Korea
The Signpost: 27 August 2012
- News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide
- Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog?
- Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten
- WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who
Somerled
Hello Brianann. I am a descendant of Somerled and I request that you do not publish information about my ancestor that is not correct. I note that you are a patrilineal descendant of Olav the Black. I am descended from him through a female line. I know my lineage and my patrilineal line which was preserved intact as my family went into exile after the battle of Culloden. My ancestor's wife and son were killed and he started a new family abroad. They were not subjected to the rape of the Highlands. We have had a DNA test and our male lineage is R1b Pictic from the line of Conn. We are Macdonalds from Clan Ranald. The information you have provided about Somerled's R1a1a haplotype is not from a reliable source and I not that the article is biased towards Olav the Black and neglects to mention the argument that Somerled was descended from Picts. There are hundreds of years worth of documents published in books which refer to his noble lineage. Even if you don't agree, you have no right to assert his Viking lineage when you are not a direct patrilineal descendant of Somerled and as such cannot test your own DNA. Either include the relevant material or I will delete the offensive statements which are not based on peer reviewed or reliable sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Moidart (talk • contribs) 05:31, 3 September 2012
- Hi Moidart. Read the article talkpage. You're using out of date sources which don't reflect modern understanding. Modern historians don't consider early-modern traditions to be automatically reliable unless they can be collaborated by other evidence. Instead they tend to prod traditions for hints and clues, rather than use them as historical narrative. You're also inappropriately using sources to bolster your own personal opinions: you can't take unrelated statements and combine to reach a totally different conclusion, or take a sourced statement and tack on your own opinion at the end. You have to understand that your personal family tree carries no weight on Wikipedia. From reading everything you've written, it's clear your imagined ancestry is actually a detriment, because you can't distance yourself from the topic. If you can't convey, in a neutral manner, what modern historians have written about the man, then you're really just wasting your time here. If want a good, easy-to-read, academic account of Somerled and his immediate family, search your library for The Kingdom of the Isles: Scotland's western seaboard, c.1100-c.1336, by R.A. McDonald.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 08:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Looks we've ended up here. And I think testing your own DNA may possibly count as original research.--Shirt58 (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know of that post. Yep, it's totally OR. If you're going to take one of those tests you've got to be prepared to accept that you may find that you aren't related to the people you thought you were. If only a quarter of MacDonalds are genetically descended from the chiefs, and in theory from Somerled himself, that means there are probably more than a few disillusioned clansmen out there!--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:42, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Looks we've ended up here. And I think testing your own DNA may possibly count as original research.--Shirt58 (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
I have not included personal DNA testing as original research. I am just letting you know who I am so you know where my point of view is coming from in regards to ethical considerations. I'm not sure if you know what ethics are. Your argument is scant, remains without citation for whole paragraphs ignoring four hundred of years of well documented history books. Your theory that Somerled was a Viking is fringe and unsubstantiated by anything other than pop science from unreliable sources. You should try reading some historical books instead of dismissing the majority of evidence as 'old'. In terms of a valid source of genealogical documentation the older the better. Modern historians are further removed from the source and cannot be relied upon. I have included modern studies and genealogical research to back up the history books. The person you are referring to is not the same person as Somerled the Viking slayer whose lineage is widely documented. I am in no way 'disillusioned' with my DNA as I come from a long line of Irish High Kings which is in accordance with Somerled's documented lineage. I don't know what Somerled you are referring to but it is not my ancestor. Your fringe argument without proper discussion of the mainstream documented lineage of Somerled is racially biased and contentious. I suggest that you remove it and stop trolling.
Moidart (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- I was away for a long weekend and I see I missed most of the excitement. Interesting to see how quickly the system can react. I am short of time right now but improving the article will hopefully lead to more stability. Ping me if you think I can help. Ben MacDui 09:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC) PS I love the comment by Shirt58 - one for the archives.
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
- Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation?
- Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somerled, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glenelg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Battle of Renfrew
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 09:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost adapts as news consumption changes
- Featured content: Not a "Gangsta's Paradise", but still rappin'
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fungi
- Special report: Two Wikipedians set to face jury trial
- Technology report: Mmmm, milkshake...
- Discussion report: Closing Wikiquette; Image Filter; Education Program and Momento extensions
The Signpost: 17 September 2012
- From the editor: Signpost expands to Facebook
- WikiProject report: Action! — The Indian Cinema Task Force
- Featured content: Go into the light
- Technology report: Future-proofing: HTML5 and IPv6
The Signpost: 24 September 2012
- In the media: Editor's response to Roth draws internet attention
- Recent research: "Rise and decline" of Wikipedia participation, new literature overviews, a look back at WikiSym 2012
- WikiProject report: 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 01101001 01100011 01110011
- News and notes: UK chapter rocked by Gibraltar scandal
- Technology report: Signpost investigation: code review times
- Featured content: Dead as...
- Discussion report: Image filter; HotCat; Syntax highlighting; and more
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Founder: Jimmy Wales
- News and notes: Independent review of UK chapter governance; editor files motion against Wikitravel owners
- Featured content: Mooned
- Technology report: WMF and the German chapter face up to Toolserver uncertainty
- WikiProject report: The Name's Bond... WikiProject James Bond
Norwegian monarchs
Could you give your opinion on Talk:Harald II of Norway#Request move?--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 20:53, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 October 2012
- News and notes: Education Program faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Ten years and one million articles: WikiProject Biography
- Featured content: A dash of Arsenikk
- Discussion report: Closing RfAs: Stewards or Bureaucrats?; Redesign of Help:Contents
The Signpost: 15 October 2012
- In the media: Wikipedia's language nerds hit the front page
- Featured content: Second star to the left
- News and notes: Chapters ask for big bucks
- Technology report: Wikidata is a go: well, almost
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemicals
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Duff (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duffy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 October 2012
- Special report: Examining adminship from the German perspective
- Arbitration report: Malleus Fatuorum accused of circumventing topic ban; motion to change "net four votes" rule
- Technology report: Wikivoyage migration: technical strategy announced
- Discussion report: Good articles on the main page?; reforming dispute resolution
- News and notes: Wikimedians get serious about women in science
- WikiProject report: Where in the world is Wikipedia?
- Featured content: Is RfA Kafkaesque?
Disambiguation link notification for October 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Costain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Austin (name) and Constantine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 October 2012
- News and notes: First chickens come home to roost for FDC funding applicants; WMF board discusses governance issues and scope of programs
- WikiProject report: In recognition of... WikiProject Military History
- Technology report: Improved video support imminent and Wikidata.org live
- Featured content: On the road again
The Signpost: 05 November 2012
- Op-ed: 2012 WikiCup comes to an end
- News and notes: Wikimedian photographic talent on display in national submissions to Wiki Loves Monuments
- In the media: Was climate change a factor in Hurricane Sandy?
- Discussion report: Protected Page Editor right; Gibraltar hooks
- Featured content: Jack-O'-Lanterns and Toads
- Technology report: Hue, Sqoop, Oozie, Zookeeper, Hive, Pig and Kafka
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Songs
The Signpost: 12 November 2012
- News and notes: Court ruling complicates the paid-editing debate
- Featured content: The table has turned
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.20 and the prospects for getting 1.21 code reviewed promptly
- WikiProject report: Land of parrots, palm trees, and the Holy Cross: WikiProject Brazil
The Signpost: 19 November 2012
- News and notes: FDC's financial muscle kicks in
- WikiProject report: No teenagers, mutants, or ninjas: WikiProject Turtles
- Technology report: Structural reorganisation "not a done deal"
- Featured content: Wikipedia hit by the Streisand effect
- Discussion report: GOOG, MSFT, WMT: the ticker symbol placement question
The Signpost: 26 November 2012
- News and notes: Toolserver finance remains uncertain
- Recent research: Movie success predictions, readability, credentials and authority, geographical comparisons
- Featured content: Panoramic views, history, and a celestial constellation
- Technology report: Wikidata reaches 100,000 entries
- WikiProject report: Directing Discussion: WikiProject Deletion Sorting
Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malvina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Godfather (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ronnie (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rögnvaldr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
- From the editor: Wikipedia, our Colosseum
- In the media: Is the Wikimedia movement too 'cash rich'?
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation fundraiser a success; Czech parliament releases photographs to chapter
- Technology report: Looking back on a year of incremental changes
- Discussion report: Image policy and guidelines; resysopping policy
- Featured content: Whoa Nelly! Featured content in review
- WikiProject report: New Year, New York
- Recent research: Wikipedia and Sandy Hook; SOPA blackout reexamined
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hayden (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heiden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
- WikiProject report: Where Are They Now? Episode IV: A New Year
- News and notes: 2012—the big year
- Featured content: Featured content in review
- Technology report: Looking ahead to 2013
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
- Investigative report: Ship ahoy! New travel site finally afloat
- News and notes: Launch of annual picture competition, new grant scheme
- WikiProject report: Reach for the Stars: WikiProject Astronomy
- Discussion report: Flag Manual of Style; accessibility and equality
- Special report: Loss of an Internet genius
- Featured content: Featured articles: Quality of reviews, quality of writing in 2012
- Arbitration report: First arbitration case in almost six months
- Technology report: Intermittent outages planned, first Wikidata client deployment
The Signpost: 21 January 2013
- News and notes: Requests for adminship reform moves forward
- WikiProject report: Say What? — WikiProject Linguistics
- Featured content: Wazzup, G? Delegates and featured topics in review
- Arbitration report: Doncram case continues
- Technology report: Data centre switchover a tentative success
Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved and ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
- Then go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
- Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
- Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
- You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (Your account is now active for 1 year!).
- If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp
cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).
- A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
- Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
- Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
- When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Questia email failure: Will resend codes
Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
13th-14th century Scottish nobles
Hi Brianann, I have created a number of stub articles for Hugh Bisset, John MacSween and Malcolm McQuillan. Do you have any sources to expand these further? Regards Newm30 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Newm30. I've added them to my watchlist. I'll keep my eyes peeled for info on them.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 10:53, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Questia email success: Codes resent
Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi t | c 21:44, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 January 2013
- In the media: Hoaxes draw media attention
- Recent research: Lessons from the research literature on open collaboration; clicks on featured articles; credibility heuristics
- WikiProject report: Checkmate! — WikiProject Chess
- Discussion report: Administrator conduct and requests
- News and notes: Khan Academy's Smarthistory and Wikipedia collaborate
- Featured content: Listing off progress from 2012
- Arbitration report: Doncram continues
- Technology report: Developers get ready for FOSDEM amid caching problems
Disambiguation link notification for February 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ragnall mac Somairle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donald Munro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2013
- Special report: Examining the popularity of Wikipedia articles
- News and notes: Article Feedback Tool faces community resistance
- WikiProject report: Land of the Midnight Sun
- Featured content: Portal people on potent potables and portable potholes
- In the media: Star Trek Into Pedantry
- Technology report: Wikidata team targets English Wikipedia deployment
Eilean Donan
Hi there, a discussion which may interest you has been started at Talk:Eilean Donan, regarding use of clan histories as sources, and the availbility of more reliable alternatives. I note that you worked on articles such as Leod Macgilleandrais which presents the distinction between history and tradition well. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 12:30, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
- And thank you so much for the revelatory link to "Kingis rabellis" to Cuidich 'n' Rìgh; the emergence of Clann Choinnich, c. 1475-1508: truly fascinating. There is enough material in there to justify the re-writing of half a dozen articles, though it will be something of an Augean task. How much more modern historical writing on the late mediaeval North West Highlands is out there, I wonder.45ossington (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2013
- Featured content: A lousy week
- WikiProject report: Just the Facts
- In the media: Wikipedia mirroring life in island ownership dispute
- Discussion report: WebCite proposal
- Technology report: Wikidata client rollout stutters
The Signpost: 18 February 2013
- WikiProject report: Thank you for flying WikiProject Airlines
- Technology report: Better templates and 3D buildings
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation declares 'victory' in Wikivoyage lawsuit
- In the media: Sue Gardner interviewed by the Australian press
- Featured content: Featured content gets schooled
The Donald
The Donald redirects to Donald Trump, Sr., which torqued me off as I was looking for The Chief of the Name, and it took me longer than I thought necessary to find Clan Donald and the current holder of the title, The Donald. --Pawyilee (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
- OK I understand now. The chief of the name tends to be called "Macdonald of Macdonald", the chief of the name and arms of Macdonald of Macdonald. [5][6].--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2013
- Recent research: Wikipedia not so novel after all, except to UK university lecturers
- News and notes: "Very lucky" Picture of the Year
- Discussion report: Wikivoyage links; overcategorization
- Featured content: Blue birds be bouncin'
- WikiProject report: How to measure a WikiProject's workload
- Technology report: Wikidata development to be continued indefinitely
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Thompson (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to MacTavish
- Thomson (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to MacTavish
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
M17
Hi Brian, yes M17 is an incorrect but common way of shortening the name of R-M17, and Somerled's descendents are well-known to be in a clade of R-M17.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 13:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
Disambiguation link notification for March 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somerled, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedigree (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baldwin of Biggar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biggar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
- Special report: Who reads which Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Special: FAQs
- Featured content: What the ?
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Wikidata phase 2 deployment timetable in doubt
Lifting the Gibraltar DYK restrictions
A couple of months ago, you opposed a proposal to lift the restrictions on Gibraltar-related DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012. Could you possibly clarify (1) under what conditions you would support a lifting of the restrictions, and (2) when you think it would be appropriate to lift the restrictions? Prioryman (talk) 20:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
- I think most people would be okay with a review of things in September.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenneth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Short form (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Re:given name and surnames articles
The how come pages like James (name) exist? Can't we just conjoin both given names and surnames into one page just with other name pages like Marshall (name)? I think I'm just going to do the same for the Patrick article. It makes no sense to have multiple pages for one name when they can be all on one page. Other name articles I have seen on wikipedia also do this. Banan14kab (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somerled, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scandinavian people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
SVG arms
Is there a way you can remove the smudge from the upper left corner of the SVG file and send a cpy to me. I do not know how to edit svgs. The file: File:Maclean of Duart and Morven arms (2).svg
I want to add the arms to Familypedia and Familysearch without the smudge. I think it is there to give a faux three dimension look, but none of the other files in the cgart I am creating have the smudge. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- I'll show you how to do it yourself. It's easy. Download and install Inkscape. Download the image and open it with Inkscape. Click Layer in the top menu bar, and then click Layers. Now look over to the farthest right of your screen to the dialog box that just popped up. It'll show four layers, each with a little eye ball and lock beside them. To remove the 'smudge' layer, click the eyeball of the layer titled "Reflet final", and that'll make this layer invisible. Another way to remove the layer is to just select it, and then click Edit in the menu bar, and then click Delete. Either way works. Now save your image (click File in the menu bar, and then click either Save, or Save as, or Save a copy). That's it, you're done.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 09:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
The Signpost: 20 May 2013
- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
The Signpost: 27 May 2013
- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
The Signpost: 05 June 2013
The Signpost: 12 June 2013
The Signpost: 19 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
- WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee
- News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
- Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
- Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting
- Technology report: May engineering report published
- Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement
The Signpost: 26 June 2013
Please comment on
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human Genetic History#Guidelines desperately needed. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 12:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 July 2013
- In the media: Jimmy Wales is not an Internet billionaire; a mass shooter's alleged Wikipedia editing
- Featured content: Queen of France
- WikiProject report: Puppies!
- News and notes: Wikipedia's medical collaborations gathering pace
- Discussion report: Snuggle, mainpage link to Wikinews, 3RR, and more
- Technology report: VisualEditor in midst of game-changing deployment series
- Traffic report: Yahoo! crushes the competition ... in Wikipedia views
- Arbitration report: Tea Party movement reopened, new AUSC appointments
stop
im sick of people undoing my edits . if people do that i will vandalise .