Jump to content

User talk:Some1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Someone963852)
    An 18th century horse mill at the Wieliczka Salt Mine, southern Poland.

    A barnstar for you!

    [edit]
    The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
    Nice catch on Female bodybuilder enthusiast. That one has been bugging me for a few months   little green rosetta(talk)
    central scrutinizer
     
    02:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the revert!

    [edit]

    Thank you for the polite revert here: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic&oldid=prev&diff=951388070&diffmode=source

    Mea culpa: I should have read the consensus and the tag.

    Bows,


    Zezen (talk) 10:51, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    [edit]
    Thank you for your message! :) Vlaeko (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    [edit]
    The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
    For your work fighting vandalism on Wikipedia. Please keep it up! TheSandDoctor Talk 05:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Yo Ho Ho

    [edit]

    Astrology upmerges

    [edit]
    Astrology upmerges
    I hereby award you this fancy gold zodiac coin for WP:BOLDly upmerging a whole bunch of astrology articles into a coherent whole. ♠PMC(talk) 22:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    Happy First Edit Day!

    [edit]
    Hey, Some1. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
    Have a great day!
    Harobouri🎢🏗️ (he/him) 23:53, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Some bubble tea for you!

    [edit]
    Thank you for contributing to "RfC: Trump Information Box Photo".

    As far as I know, contributing to Wikipedia opens the eyes and ears of many people. :) Goodtiming8871 (talk) 09:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

    [edit]

    Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Happy First Edit Day!

    [edit]
    Happy First Edit Day!

    Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

    From the Birthday Committee, DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Tech News: 2025-03

    [edit]

    MediaWiki message delivery 01:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    The Signpost: 15 January 2025

    [edit]

    Files listed for discussion

    [edit]

    Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 January 17 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

    Thank you. Di (they-them) (talk) 22:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Tech News: 2025-04

    [edit]

    MediaWiki message delivery 01:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Wokeism

    [edit]

    If you want to get rid of the extra details on the "woke" thing and that's it, do you mind keeping the bit about Tucker Carlson without doing a full revert and since you didn't mention him? JPHC2003 (talk) 02:17, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello and thanks for asking. The "doesn't need to be that detailed" part in my summary is referring to both the wokeism parenthetical and the Tucker Carlson bit. His bio doesn't need to list every single person he has criticized or praised, and singling out Tucker Carlson like that is out of place for a more generalized paragraph regarding his views in general. Unless Carlson has some noteworthy involvement with Mangione, then it's just trivia at this point. Some1 (talk) 02:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I missed him praising Joe Rogan, Elon Musk and Peter Thiel as well. That Latin Times article is still a valuable source, though, even if it doesn't need to get more specific, so I think that alone can be added. JPHC2003 (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you mean adding just the source or listing all of those names? Because we don't need a laundry list of public figures he had praised (or criticized), but I think adding a ref is fine. Some1 (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No, I meant just the source. Just wanted to clarify so in case it got reverted I don't get banned or something. JPHC2003 (talk) 05:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

    [edit]

    Your feedback is requested at Talk:2028 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Tech News: 2025-05

    [edit]

    MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk: Donald Trump lead sentence discussion

    [edit]

    Hi Some1,

    I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to reach out about a consensus debate currently happening on Donald Trump’s page, as it mirrors a similar situation we encountered during Joe Biden’s presidency. Four years ago, we agreed on a consensus to keep the lead sentence format, which I believe was both fair and sensible. Specifically, the line for Joe Biden was: "...who has been the 46th and current president of the United States since 2021." Looking back, I see that you were in favor of maintaining this as the status quo. Talk:Joe Biden/Archive 15#RfC: Should we say he is "current" president in the lead, or not?

    I believe we should apply this same structure to Donald Trump’s page, just as we did for Joe Biden and Barack Obama before him, to ensure consistency and clarity. This format clearly conveys the order ("47th"), incumbency ("current"), and start date ("since 2025"), which helps maintain uniformity across presidential biographies.

    Given your involvement and support in that earlier consensus, your insights would be incredibly valuable in the current discussion. It’s important that we uphold the same standards regardless of the officeholder, and I’d appreciate it if you could weigh in, share your thoughts, and cast a vote. Here is the current discussion and vote underway: Talk:Donald Trump, Superseding consensus #50, sentences 1 and 2

    Thanks a lot, and I hope you’ll consider contributing. TimeToFixThis (talk) 07:52, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    There's too many cooks in the kitchen in that discussion, so I'd rather stay out, thanks. Some1 (talk) 00:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough. Thanks for your time. TimeToFixThis (talk) 02:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Elon Musk article

    [edit]

    Just passing by to say I appreciate your efforts with helping clean up the Musk article, and moving content to the correct place etc. It's nice to see it finally coming together as a more coherent subject :) CNC (talk) 18:52, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you, CommunityNotesContributor! I appreciate your work on that article, too--I don’t think I would’ve made those edits if it weren't for your work in transforming the main article into something more readable (that article wasn't readable before, tbh). Thanks for taking the initiative in summarizing those child articles. Some1 (talk) 19:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Tech News: 2025-06

    [edit]

    MediaWiki message delivery 00:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment

    [edit]

    Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
    You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

    Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]