Talk:Wonderful Pretty Cure!
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | On 21 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Wonderful Precure!. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
Friendly “Tact” or “Wand”?
[edit]So, according to Crunchyroll, that they are referring the Friendly Tact as a “wand”, despite referring Delicious Party’s Party Candle Tact as a “tact”, and it’s 8th episode title translating Oishina Town as “Delicious Town”, but still uses said original name for the subtitles. In addition, I heard Crunchyroll is using artificial intelligence for their subtitles 2600:8801:42A:D200:566:36E4:9F2C:F930 (talk) 15:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- So, I searched up and turns out Crunchyroll isn’t using AI on subtitles. In addition, I think you are referring the changes to the episode descriptions; apparently Crunchyroll is referring Tropical-Rouge’s Grand Ocean as “Gran Ocean” for both episode titles and subtitles, despite articles covering the series still referring it by the said original name for the character descriptions and episode descriptions. With this, it seems that this discussion would be over implanting the word “tact” over “wand” for episode descriptions.
Edit: The episode description edits are implanted; although we’ll see if other users here will accept the name changes. 2600:8801:42A:D200:91C:B86B:63BC:8F19 (talk) 06:11, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 21 May 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 21:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wonderful Pretty Cure! → Wonderful Precure!
- List of Wonderful Pretty Cure! episodes → List of Wonderful Precure! episodes
– Crunchyroll's official title. [1] HelloYu0910 (talk) 08:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 10:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 08:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- The wiki fandom has named it Wonderful Pretty Cure! Even the Soaring Sky! Pretty Cure is named pretty cure. Even though it's named Soaring Sky! PreCure on Crunchyroll Anime1990 (talk) 23:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Besides PreCure is a short name for Pretty Cure Anime1990 (talk) 23:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the previous Pretty Cure series are named Pretty Cure even though it's called PreCure Anime1990 (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fandom wiki is not a reliable source. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- According to the Google search, the result number under "Wonderful Precure!" is 7,180,000 [2] As for "Wonderful Pretty Cure!", the result number is 68,800,000 [3]. Beside that, the logo on the original title also have "Wonderful Precure!" as its' English title. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fandom wiki is not a reliable source. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended back and forther between HelloYu0910 and Anime1990; collapsed to make it easier for uninvolved editors to participate. BilledMammal (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Oppose Renaming one series should be made to be consistent with the entire Pretty Cure/Precure franchise. An RM should extend to all of them and establish that Precure is the common name of the franchise and whatever exceptions need to be made. Each article's body text would require updating to reflect any name changes and also list the unshortened name. ― Synpath 23:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with this. Having one page change its name would create inconsistencies. Historyday01 (talk) 14:17, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support based on WP:COMMONNAME used by reliable English sources. "Wonderful PreCure" is the name used by Crunchyroll,[13][14] Anime News Network,[15][16] Comic Book Resources,[17] Otaku USA,[18] and Time of India.[19] I have not found a single reliable English language source that uses "Wonderful Pretty Cure" as the English title. All the hits that do come up are user-generated forums and wikis and unscrupulous retail sites selling potentially bootleg items. Finally, what titles the other series use should depend on what reliable English-language sources use. For some, that would be Pretty Cure. For most of the rest, it will be PreCure. There is no requirement to arbitrarily dictate a consistent naming convention for all franchise series articles, especially when reliable English-language sources use no consistent naming convention from series to series. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- I am sure @HelloYu0910 wanted to have consistent naming for Pretty Cure series even if we have to change some Pretty Cure to PreCure we might have to the change the franchise name of Pretty Cure to PreCure to make it consistent and the characters title of Pretty Cure to PreCure. Anime1990 (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Anime1990 I think you get the wrong idea. I actually just simply want to let Precure series matches it official title, and that is what I want to talk about for a very long time. HelloYu0910 (talk) 08:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- I am sure @HelloYu0910 wanted to have consistent naming for Pretty Cure series even if we have to change some Pretty Cure to PreCure we might have to the change the franchise name of Pretty Cure to PreCure to make it consistent and the characters title of Pretty Cure to PreCure. Anime1990 (talk) 05:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Extended back and forther between HelloYu0910 and Anime1990; collapsed to make it easier for uninvolved editors to participate. BilledMammal (talk) 08:02, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
- Relisting comment: Relisting for additional participation; Anime1990 and HelloYu0910 I suggest you step back from this discussion, to allow others the chance to participate. BilledMammal (talk) 08:00, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree. My view on not changing the name remains the same as it was in that previous discussion. The sources cited above include unreliable sources and I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name. Historyday01 (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- You claim that you don't believe any of the English-language sources I posted above are reliable, what is your evidence and what reliable English-language sources do you have to support your claim that "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is the common English name? Secondly, if the series is inconsistent between using "Pretty Cure" or "PreCure" in its English language titles, that is not something for Wikipedia to "correct". Article titles should follow WP:COMMONNAME, even if there is inconsistency from series to series. And using "Wonderful Pretty Cure" for the sake of "consistency" when no reliable English-language sources uses that title is a violation of WP:NOR. You are inventing a title based purely on your personal preference and not because it is the title used by reliable English-language sources. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at this link https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html it says pretty cure between / and .html that is why Wikipedia called the franchise name Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Anime News Network is not reliable source as @Historyday01 said this: Additionally, the ANN encyclopedia isn't a reliable source. As it states on WP:A&M/ORS "Do not cite the user-edited encyclopedia database" Anime9000 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- WP:OR.
- About ANN is not reliable source, it is only because you gived encyclopedia link not news. HelloYu0910 (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- For exmaple,
- [48] is a news which is fine, consider WP:ANIMENEWSNETWORK said so.
- As for the encyclopedia, due to WP:ANIMENEWSNETWORK said "Do not cite the user-edited encyclopedia database or any articles marked as advertorial.", which lend to news is an reliable source while encyclopedia database not. HelloYu0910 (talk) 16:17, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I only see "Wonderful Precure!" on the page you linked. Yes, the franchise as a whole is called "Pretty Cure" in English, but the use of "Pretty Cure" and "Precure" is inconsistent, even on the official website. Therefore, article titles should be based on which version of the name is used by reliable English-language sources and not on personal preference. Changing all names to be consistent, even when it is not the WP:COMMONNAME, is not an improvement of the encyclopedia. Secondly, ANN's news and review section is a reliable source and has withstood multiple WP:RS/N and project discussions. Only the encyclopedia section is deemed unreliable due to being based on user generated content. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Anime News Network is not reliable source as @Historyday01 said this: Additionally, the ANN encyclopedia isn't a reliable source. As it states on WP:A&M/ORS "Do not cite the user-edited encyclopedia database" Anime9000 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, my main issue is that if you name one page "PreCure" and the others "Pretty Cure", it creates inconsistency. I think there should be a RfC on Talk:Pretty Cure instead about whether to use "PreCure" or "Pretty Cure". My personal preference doesn't matter here. Otherwise, it seems we are going in circles are not going anywhere, and the same people are discussing it without those from outside this discussion, which is unfortunate. Historyday01 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- The "inconsistency" of the titles aren't a problem. And we shouldn't be inventing titles just to make things "consistent" when those titles aren't used by reliable English=language sources per WP:COMMONNAME. Policy and guidelines trumps personal preferences with regards to article titles and content. And your expressed desire for "consistency" with article where none exists in reliable English-language sources is a personal preference. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you that existing sources can be inconsistent in their use of PreCure and Pretty Cure, as the Toei Animation page on the series makes that clear. At the same time, I'd also say that means even more than this should be decided in a way that effects ALL the Pretty Cure pages (this is what @― Synpath said earlier, which noting: "An RM should extend to all of them and establish that Precure is the common name of the franchise and whatever exceptions need to be made. Each article's body text would require updating to reflect any name changes and also list the unshortened name"), no just one. A requested move or RfC would work. In terms of personal preference, I will say that I don't personally care which one is used (when I said "I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name" I was basing that on the sources which have been cited in this discussion, not elsewhere). Instead, I'd like to be done in the right way... I did attempt to get more people to comment on this discussion by posting on relevant projects, although I'm not sure that worked. Historyday01 (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- If there is to be a consistent standard applied to all articles within the franchise, it should be, "The title should reflect the WP:COMMONNAME as used by reliable English-language sources, whether that be 'PreCure' or 'Pretty Cure'." Whether that leads to different titles being used between different articles within the franchise is not a problem so long Wikipedia's policy and guidelines are followed. Trying to invent novel titles for the sake of consistency is not an improvement of the encyclopedia. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- LOL. I'm not trying to invent anything, I just think it would cause confusion to have different titles within the same franchise. If you truly believe that there are reliable English-language sources which show "Wonderful PreCure" is the preferred name, please provide them, because the ones I have seen so far are wholly inadequate. Historyday01 (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I already gave a number of links to reliable English-language sources using the title "Wonderful PreCure" for the series title, yet you still refuse to accept any of them. I've also looked and have yet to find a single reliable English-language source using the title "Wonderful Pretty Cure". The best I can manage are places quoting Wikipedia and bootleg sellers. If you believe that "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is the common name, do provide a number of sources supporting it. Otherwise "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is nothing more than an invented title based on original research, specifically WP:SYNTH. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 20:54, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- LOL. I'm not trying to invent anything, I just think it would cause confusion to have different titles within the same franchise. If you truly believe that there are reliable English-language sources which show "Wonderful PreCure" is the preferred name, please provide them, because the ones I have seen so far are wholly inadequate. Historyday01 (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- If there is to be a consistent standard applied to all articles within the franchise, it should be, "The title should reflect the WP:COMMONNAME as used by reliable English-language sources, whether that be 'PreCure' or 'Pretty Cure'." Whether that leads to different titles being used between different articles within the franchise is not a problem so long Wikipedia's policy and guidelines are followed. Trying to invent novel titles for the sake of consistency is not an improvement of the encyclopedia. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you that existing sources can be inconsistent in their use of PreCure and Pretty Cure, as the Toei Animation page on the series makes that clear. At the same time, I'd also say that means even more than this should be decided in a way that effects ALL the Pretty Cure pages (this is what @― Synpath said earlier, which noting: "An RM should extend to all of them and establish that Precure is the common name of the franchise and whatever exceptions need to be made. Each article's body text would require updating to reflect any name changes and also list the unshortened name"), no just one. A requested move or RfC would work. In terms of personal preference, I will say that I don't personally care which one is used (when I said "I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name" I was basing that on the sources which have been cited in this discussion, not elsewhere). Instead, I'd like to be done in the right way... I did attempt to get more people to comment on this discussion by posting on relevant projects, although I'm not sure that worked. Historyday01 (talk) 16:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- The "inconsistency" of the titles aren't a problem. And we shouldn't be inventing titles just to make things "consistent" when those titles aren't used by reliable English=language sources per WP:COMMONNAME. Policy and guidelines trumps personal preferences with regards to article titles and content. And your expressed desire for "consistency" with article where none exists in reliable English-language sources is a personal preference. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 16:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Look at this link https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html it says pretty cure between / and .html that is why Wikipedia called the franchise name Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- You claim that you don't believe any of the English-language sources I posted above are reliable, what is your evidence and what reliable English-language sources do you have to support your claim that "Wonderful Pretty Cure" is the common English name? Secondly, if the series is inconsistent between using "Pretty Cure" or "PreCure" in its English language titles, that is not something for Wikipedia to "correct". Article titles should follow WP:COMMONNAME, even if there is inconsistency from series to series. And using "Wonderful Pretty Cure" for the sake of "consistency" when no reliable English-language sources uses that title is a violation of WP:NOR. You are inventing a title based purely on your personal preference and not because it is the title used by reliable English-language sources. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 14:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have to agree. My view on not changing the name remains the same as it was in that previous discussion. The sources cited above include unreliable sources and I'm not convinced that "PreCure" is the common name. Historyday01 (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
Arbitrary break
[edit]- The same can be said to Soaring Sky Pretty Cure because it's named PreCure in Toei Animation website but no one wants to move it PreCure even @Historyday01 doesn't agree with the move Anime9000 (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the Pretty Cure All Stars movies in Wikipedia from this link: https://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Pretty_Cure_All_Stars does not follow the WP:COMMONNAME based on this link: https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.html at the bottom of the page except for the one that was released in 2016 called PRETTY CURE ALL STARS
- SING TOGETHER MIRACLE MAGIC Anime9000 (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said it once, said it twice, and many times already. But, here, I will just repeat it again, just change it if it doesn't based on WP:COMMONNAME. Not hard at all. HelloYu0910 (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- But if someone changes it will get changed back to Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Chief among them @Historyday01, who moved a number of Precure articles to "Pretty Cure" during the course of this discussion in assert their personal preference for "consistency" rather than based on the title used by reliable English-language sources. All of those other moves should be undone. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again, it wasn't about a "personal preference," I moved them because it seemed wrong to have ONE page be different, and the fact that the page move was done without any discussion. I stand by my move and wouldn't do it any differently. We need to have a discussion about ALL the Pretty Cure pages, not just this one. To move this one, and NOT the others, without a discussion, would be inconsistent. The last thing we want to do is confuse people reading these pages. Historyday01 (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- "I moved them because it seemed wrong to have ONE page be different,"
- That is a personal preference and one not supported by Wikipedia policies, guidelines, or reliable English-langauge sources. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 20:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Again, it wasn't about a "personal preference," I moved them because it seemed wrong to have ONE page be different, and the fact that the page move was done without any discussion. I stand by my move and wouldn't do it any differently. We need to have a discussion about ALL the Pretty Cure pages, not just this one. To move this one, and NOT the others, without a discussion, would be inconsistent. The last thing we want to do is confuse people reading these pages. Historyday01 (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Chief among them @Historyday01, who moved a number of Precure articles to "Pretty Cure" during the course of this discussion in assert their personal preference for "consistency" rather than based on the title used by reliable English-language sources. All of those other moves should be undone. 216.30.147.90 (talk) 17:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- But if someone changes it will get changed back to Pretty Cure Anime9000 (talk) 17:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I said it once, said it twice, and many times already. But, here, I will just repeat it again, just change it if it doesn't based on WP:COMMONNAME. Not hard at all. HelloYu0910 (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: For all participants here, specifically @216.30.147.90, @HelloYu0910, @―Synpath, @HelloYu0910, @User:Blackgaia02, @Shadow, and @BilledMammal, I have posted a RfC at Talk:Pretty Cure#"Pretty Cure" or "PreCure"?, asking for comments on whether to use Pretty Cure or PreCure for all related pages, based on the above discussion. I see no point in participating in this specific discussion again, as it is going in circles, and I will not be changing my opinion either.--Historyday01 (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Italics
[edit]Why is the opening paragraph in Italic? I tried to fix it but I don't think it worked. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:248C:67D2:B55E:6F5F (talk) 20:13, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- There was an extra ' 182.239.93.153 (talk) 02:08, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Okay. I didn't notice. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:FC8A:DF36:C6F3:F121 (talk) 11:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Topic about their own movie
[edit]So Toei just announced that they will have their own movie titled Wonderful Precure The Movie! Doki Doki ♡ Grand Adventure in the Game World! (in Japanese is called わんだふるぷりきゅあ!ざ・むーびー! ドキドキ♡ゲームの世界で大冒険! in Kana and Wandafuru Purikyua Za Mūbī! Dokidoki ♡ Gemu no Sekai de Daiboken! according to Hepburn writing). Is it plausible to add it? Nobi-Wiki (talk) 07:32, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Daifuku
[edit]Where did the information about him having Satoru's surname come from? 73.79.229.7 (talk) 12:26, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Spoilers
[edit]I added information about Satoru and Daifuku's forms in the movie, but I am worried that it is too early to add this information since the movie was just released today, even though there are official sources reporting about it. 2601:547:CC80:4F00:F44F:C41:C867:DAE5 (talk) 17:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Requested move 12 February 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
- Wonderful Pretty Cure! → Wonderful Precure!
- Soaring Sky! Pretty Cure → Soaring Sky! Precure
- You and Idol Pretty Cure → You and Idol Precure
– Toei Animation USA and Crunchyroll's official name. Continue our previous discussion (from 7 months ago, wow that's long), in my point of view, my statement still never changed. I still suggest to just stuck to the name that given by Toei Animation USA, Crunchyroll or the English title on the original Japanese logo unless there are enough reliable sources to change it to another name. Let me rephrase something, based on WP:ANN and, WP:FANDOM, Fandoms and Anime News Network's wiki IS NOT AN RELIABLE SOURCE, please don't make anyone go into the circles like last time. Cause I really want to have a final decision. One more note, this page, Wonderful Pretty Cure was originally named Wonderful PreCure! until @Anime1990 changed it because of "misspelled", which was a false accussion. HelloYu0910 (talk) 11:40, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support. We go with WP:USEENGLISH and defer to official releases. Crunchyroll uses Precure, Wikipedia uses Precure. News sites using a different title is irrelevant. Fresh Precure we defer to Toei USA's licensing page because that's the guide that the streaming services that are picking up official releases are using to name them and if it comes to Crunchyroll in the next year or two, that will be the name they use. "Number of reliable sources" is not the metric, the official release trumps all of them. It's admittedly not helped that Toei themselves is very inconsistent, but for these pages in particular, the English titles have been very consistent. EDIT: Since this was reopened, I still support changing the names but since all the moves already got reverted anyway, it's reasonable to use the "Precure" capitalization versus "PreCure." I've updated the list with all the shows affected but I kept the capitalization to be consistent with other Wikipedia pages for now. If we use Precure, then we have to also move the pages again for Splash Star, Yes!, HeartCatch, Suite, Smile, and DokiDoki. It also goes without saying that all their subpages need to move too (such as episode lists.)Rebochan (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia alternate between Precure and Pretty Cure, I know a lot of people are coping the fandom style using Pretty Cure because its a japanese title. based on "I know the fandom and wikis run by the fandom use the Japanese title" quote from @RebochanAnime1990 (talk) 11:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- Sorry my response was a little muddled. Should really say If Crunchyroll uses Precure, then Wikipedia uses Precure. This is not actually used consistently in the franchise itself - see Crunchyroll's listings for the first three series where the logo says "Pretty Cure" and the streaming catalog and the licensing page say "Precure." I just wanted to emphasize that for these specific shows, the logo and the licensing/streaming titles are actually consistent in English so this is straightforward. Rebochan (talk) 12:37, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Right. Before there was no consensus, but I'd be fine with moving it to whatever name has the most reliable sources to support it. The names you note above, align with what is mentioned on Toei Animation's official page listing the names of ALL the Pretty Cure series. Whereas, Crunchyroll uses the names Wonderful Precure!, Soaring Sky! Precure (also used on Prime Video), Witchy Precure!, Kira Kira☆Precure a La Mode (all in caps lock for some reason), and You and Idol Precure ♪. Notably, Fresh PreCure! isn't on Crunchyroll. Anyway, these names are also confirmed on the official sites, listing "Wonderful Precure!", "Fresh PreCure", "Kirakira PreCure a la Mode" (one official site calls it "precure alamode"), and "You and Idol Precure ♪.
- However, Soaring Sky is called "hirogaru sky precure" and "hirogaru sky" on official sites (which could just be listed as alternate names), while Anime News Network articles give the name "Soaring Sky! Pretty Cure" here, here, and here, to give three examples. Additionally, Witchy Precure is called "mahotsukai_precure" and "mahotsukai precure 2", both of which can be listed as alternate names, with ANN using the names "Witchy Pretty Cure!" here and here to give two examples.
- While saying all of that, I would vote to move the pages to the names you suggested. Historyday01 (talk) 13:27, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
If we change some to PreCure some movies also has to change Christnz1990 (talk) 03:34, 13 February 2025 (UTC)Sock of Anime1990. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)- Yes, and the episode list as well. HelloYu0910 (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I still think the person who will close the request will say no consensus because BilledMammal is the one who reviews the page move requestAnime1990 (talk) 15:08, 14 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- Base on our previous discussion, yes, indeed, it was an "no consensus" discussion, it's not because of someone was thinking that the discussion was no consensus, IT IS BECAUSE we truly didn't have any no consensus on that discussion, that's why I want to make a end on this in this discussion. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- And I think we have more of a consensus this time around. Historyday01 (talk) 14:12, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Base on our previous discussion, yes, indeed, it was an "no consensus" discussion, it's not because of someone was thinking that the discussion was no consensus, IT IS BECAUSE we truly didn't have any no consensus on that discussion, that's why I want to make a end on this in this discussion. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- I would be fine with that, *if* the sources support those changes, as I noted in my above comment. Historyday01 (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, and the episode list as well. HelloYu0910 (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
I am sure people use this format WP:TRANSLITERATE If there are too few reliable English-language sources to constitute an established usage,....follow the translation convention.Anime1990 (talk) 03:51, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- @Anime1990, too few reliable sources? Not sure what you mean, but checkout the news.
- For Fresh PreCure!, [49][50], not sure if it's enough, but Toei Animation USA named it Fresh PreCure!, and is one of the reliable source.
- For Witchy Precure!, [51][52][53][54], most of them are Witchy Precure!, while some of them is Witchy PreCure!, Witchy Pretty Cure!, Maho Girls Precure!, Maho Girls PreCure! and Maho Girls Pretty Cure!.
- For Kirakira PreCure a la Mode, [55][56], most of them are "Precure", while only a few of them are "Pretty Cure". So, it should be better to just use "Precure" instead of "PreCure", I will think about it.
- For Soaring Sky! Precure, [57][58], some news are "Pretty Cure", while some of them are "Precure" or "PreCure".
- For Wonderful Precure!, [59][60], mainly every single news about it have only used Wonderful Precure!.
- For You and Idol Precure, [61][62], mainly every single news about it have only used You and Idol Precure.
- Not sure if this answer your question, but I believe this is enough to prove that all of the pages that I list do actually have enough reliable sources to support my argument. And try to stop making the discussion in a circle, okay? Cause I really want it to get a conclusion. HelloYu0910 (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
I didn't create the You and Idol pretty cure wikipedia website I was about to move them to Precure.Anime1990 (talk) 13:31, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)mostly the format of the these websites that on are on wikipedia are copies from fandomAnime1990 (talk) 13:33, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- I'm not saying that, you're the one who create the You and Idol Precure page, I was just saying the I have enough reliable source to move the page. And, you don't have any proof that those are copy from the wiki, don't you? HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:47, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Some of the decorative logo say Pretty Cure but Bolded one say PreCure I think that is why its hard to name them. For example: The decorative logo says Fresh Pretty Cure but the bolded one says Fresh PreCure in this website https://www.toei-animation-usa.com/pretty-cure.htmlAnime1990 (talk) 13:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- Yes, and that can be settle by using "stylized as Fresh Pretty Cure!" on the first line. You may think that, you can swap it. But, reliable sources had just proven my point. HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Apple TV name it Fresh Pretty Cure https://tv.apple.com/jp/show/%E3%83%95%E3%83%AC%E3%83%83%E3%82%B7%E3%83%A5%E3%83%95%E3%83%AA%E3%82%AD%E3%83%A5%E3%82%A2/umc.cmc.qubfgp2st43331nq6uxuak59?l=en-US They use the same format as Fandom but reword stuff.Anime1990 (talk) 13:52, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- Okay, then. We can discuss about Fresh. Anything else? HelloYu0910 (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
I agree to move them so someone needs to move the first series to Precure because its say Precure on the USA toei pageAnime1990 (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)Crunchyroll also says Precure for first seasonAnime1990 (talk) 13:56, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)I am sure if we rename some of them they will be changed back unless we have a protection so only people who can login can editAnime1990 (talk) 14:03, 15 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- The first series, huh? Alright, let's discuss about that.
- Sources
- HelloYu0910 (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- If you find more, feel free to list it. HelloYu0910 (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Number of sources is irrelevant. Defer to official releases pre WP:USEENGLISH. This should not be a debate. Rebochan (talk) 10:21, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Even without using the Google hits, and the sources I noted in my above comment, is enough to support your proposed changes. Historyday01 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, so we're talking about the first series, Futari wa Pretty Cure now. HelloYu0910 (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Talk about the first series on the page for the first series, I already started a rename request on there. Rebochan (talk) 10:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, so we're talking about the first series, Futari wa Pretty Cure now. HelloYu0910 (talk) 14:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Anime1990, too few reliable sources? Not sure what you mean, but checkout the news.
so @Rebochan is saying that ANN news is not a reliable source to name the articles but go with the ones that show on streaming site like crunchyroll and Toei USA animation page.Anime1990 (talk) 11:23, 18 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- We use the title of the primary source, which is the show itself that you can watch right now on Crunchyroll for all but one of those cases. The last case, Fresh, is being covered by the licensing guide that we know the streamers are using. This should not even be controversial. WP:USEENGLISH, WP:COMMONNAME, and MOS:AM. Come up with a policy that backs you up if you feel otherwise. Rebochan (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
what @HelloYu0910 wants is the english title on the pages and logo titles (japenese title) on altenative line based Toei Animation USA pageAnime1990 (talk) 23:40, 18 February 2025 (UTC) (Vio of SOCK) --Super Goku V (talk) 09:26, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- @Anime1990 Well, please check the discussion that was on Talk:Futari wa Pretty Cure page. Because of how many primary source that shown "Pretty Cure" instead of "PreCure" or "Precure", I support to rename the page, Futari wa Pretty Cure to Pretty Cure. Remember, Crunchyroll or other streaming platform is an primary source too, as the result, I have no problem to change Futari wa Pretty Cure to Pretty Cure as long as there's reliable primary sources to support it. HelloYu0910 (talk) 00:14, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- We use the title of the primary source, which is the show itself that you can watch right now on Crunchyroll for all but one of those cases. The last case, Fresh, is being covered by the licensing guide that we know the streamers are using. This should not even be controversial. WP:USEENGLISH, WP:COMMONNAME, and MOS:AM. Come up with a policy that backs you up if you feel otherwise. Rebochan (talk) 14:15, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hey since this discussion got reopened, I went and added the remaining show pages that are being affected by this move. Wikipedia doesn't seem to be adding the page move template to all of them but I have at least made sure the first entry in the list has every series. Rebochan (talk) 23:27, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Sock of Anime1990. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Administrator note I have reopened this discussion and struck out or hatted comments by socks of User:Anime1990. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I just did all the moves today and another editor reviewed all of them and reverted them. I am done with this discussion. Fix the pages or don't, I'm not doing the work again because that took most of a day based on following Wikipedia's rules. Getting scolded for following the rules is not worth the time. My arguments don't change, we have the primary sources so I don't even know why this is controversial. Rebochan (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. I completely agree with the previous statement ending this discussion, and I'm unsure why this was reopened. My stance in favor of the changed page names remains. I'm sorry that another editor undid your work. That's not right. I call for this discussion to be closed, again, this time by an admin who ISN'T a sock. Isn't it the job of Wikipedia admins to crack down on sock accounts?Historyday01 (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- They even undid my moves related to the first series, when that discussion (on Talk:Futari wa Pretty Cure) got reopened. So now we're back to using the Japanese name because *shrug*. Rebochan (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- That's annoying. It really is a debacle. Historyday01 (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- To clarify the editor who undid all of my work was Hey man im josh, who was uninvolved. But also scolded me on my talk page. Rebochan (talk) 23:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Rebochan: My expectation is that if you're stating, in your edit summaries, that you're matching the main articles, the moves you're making should actually match the main article. I'm sorry you felt that message was a scolding, but I reverted the moves because the move reason was incorrect and because the episode lists should match the names of the main articles. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- At the time that I made those moves, those *were* the titles of the main articles. They got reverted too. Rebochan (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Rebochan: My expectation is that if you're stating, in your edit summaries, that you're matching the main articles, the moves you're making should actually match the main article. I'm sorry you felt that message was a scolding, but I reverted the moves because the move reason was incorrect and because the episode lists should match the names of the main articles. Hey man im josh (talk) 23:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
They should not have given close move pemerission to non-admin users because any non admin can close a requested move because BilledMammal was a non admin page mover because we were still discussing but he randomly closed it. It say a non admin page mover can close the requested move if he is not involved in this discussion. 182.239.114.49 (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)Blocked sock. Rebochan (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2025 (UTC)- is this another sock? This is very close to how Anime1990 and their socks write. Rebochan (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- It does seems like it from my point of view. HelloYu0910 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Looks like it got blocked for ban evasion, so yes. I'll just strike it through now and save us all some trouble. Rebochan (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- It does seems like it from my point of view. HelloYu0910 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- is this another sock? This is very close to how Anime1990 and their socks write. Rebochan (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- To clarify the editor who undid all of my work was Hey man im josh, who was uninvolved. But also scolded me on my talk page. Rebochan (talk) 23:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- That's annoying. It really is a debacle. Historyday01 (talk) 22:56, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. I think we have reached the end of this, there is already a conclusion, and we surely don't need to start all our discussion again because of a socks. My requests and statements never change. Change those page accordingly and closed this discussion with a admin who is not a socks. Thanks. HelloYu0910 (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I would be opposed to that at this time. The move discussion requests have changed since they were first proposed. You only proposed six articles to be moved, with two of them being Wonderful Pretty Cure! → Wonderful Precure! and You and Idol Pretty Cure → You and Idol Precure. Those two mention have been changed to use the wording PreCure over Precure and there are five new entries which do not appear to have been discussed at all.
- Are you sure there is a consensus to move the titles that haven't been discussed at all or were changed mid-discussion? --Super Goku V (talk) 09:14, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, all of those titles would be affected because they're all using the same source to comply with WP:USEENGLISH and it would be pointless to start a second move request for them since the discussion would use the same primary sources and have the same end result. Or at least they should since again, same primary source. The only reason this is "controversial" is because offsite wikis and fan forums use different naming conventions.
- The two that got moved to "Precure" were done without following the results of the original closed discussion at all, which should not have happened. Rebochan (talk) 10:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Rebochan @Historyday01 Okay, so, let us conclude and discuss every season from PreCure series the final time so that we're all make sure that we're on the same page.
- First Season: Futari wa Pretty Cure → Pretty Cure (2004 TV series), because lot of primary sources had shown that "Pretty Cure" is the common use one.
- Second Season: PreCure Splash Star → stay unchanged, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Third Season: Yes! PreCure 5 → stay unchanged, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Fourth Season: Fresh Pretty Cure! → Fresh PreCure!, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Fifth Season: HeartCatch PreCure! → Heart Catch PreCure, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Sixth Season: Suite PreCure → stay unchanged, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Seventh Season: Smile PreCure! → stay unchanged, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Eighth Season: DokiDoki! PreCure, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Ninth Season: HappinessCharge Pretty Cure! → Happiness Charge PreCure!, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Tenth Season: Go! Princess Pretty Cure → Go! Princess PreCure, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Eleventh Season: Witchy Pretty Cure! → Witchy PreCure! (because of Toei Animation USA official website.), or Witchy Precure! (because of Crunchyroll's title).
- Twelfth Season: Kirakira Pretty Cure a la Mode → KiraKira PreCure a la Mode, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Thirteenth Season: Hug! PreCure → Hug! Pretty Cure, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Fourteenth Season: Star Twinkle PreCure → stay unchanged, because of Toei Animation USA official website.
- Fifteenth Season: Healin' Good Pretty Cure → stay unchanged (because of Toei Animation USA official website) or change it into Healin' Good Precure (because of Crunchyroll's title).
- Sixteenth Season: Tropical-Rouge! Pretty Cure → stay unchanged (because of Toei Animation USA official website) or change it into Tropical-Rouge! Precure (because of Crunchyroll's title).
- Seventeenth Season: Delicious Party Pretty Cure → stay unchanged (because of Toei Animation USA official website) or change it into Delicious Party Precure (because of Crunchyroll's title).
- Eighteenth Season: Soaring Sky! Pretty Cure → Soaring Sky! Precure, because of Toei Animation USA official website and Crunchyroll's title.
- Nineteenth Season: Wonderful Pretty Cure! → Wonderful Precure!, because of Toei Animation USA official website and Crunchyroll's title.
- Twentieth Season: You and Idol Pretty Cure → You and Idol Precure, because of Toei Animation USA official website and Crunchyroll's title.
- HelloYu0910 (talk) 11:35, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please remember that "PreCure", "Precure" and "Pretty Cure" are used differently, so please choose wisely. HelloYu0910 (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Fixed typo. Changed Happiness Charge! PreCure to Happiness Charge PreCure!. HelloYu0910 (talk) 11:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- To be honest, since these shows are getting rapidly licensed and released on Crunchyroll, it's probably best to use the Precure spelling for everything that uses "Precure" just so we don't have to keep doing move requests. It'd be great if they'd tell us what's coming and when, or even if they were consistent in their own branding.
- The first series should be "Pretty Cure" on this Wiki because of the multiple English releases of the show (including a televised dub and multiple digital sales) used "Pretty Cure" and they're still selling it with the old English logo on all the promotional materials. I linked all of those sources on the page for Talk:Futari wa Pretty Cure where there's a parallel move discussion (which may honestly be separate.) Rebochan (talk) 14:25, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. Crunchyroll does seem they are releasing/licensing more of them as of late. Historyday01 (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- So, you're saying that except the first season, Pretty Cure, the thirteenth season, Hug! Pretty Cure, and the series name using "PreCure" on both Crunchyroll and Toei Animation USA, use "Precure" instead? HelloYu0910 (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm saying everything except the first season should be Precure because that's what they're getting released as. And yea, I think there's gonna be more because they're coming out at a really fast clip even though its with little fanfair at the moment (I usually find out when I log into Reddit), with the release rate speeding up dramatically starting in 2024. The last release was Yes! in December, barely two months ago, and we doubled the back catalog shows by the end of the year. Rebochan (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Alright then, let me list it again to see if it's okay to do it this way.
- First Season: Futari wa Pretty Cure → Pretty Cure (2004 TV series).
- Second Season: PreCure Splash Star → stay unchanged[a].
- Third Season: Yes! PreCure 5 → Yes! Precure 5.
- Fourth Season: Fresh Pretty Cure! → Fresh Precure!.
- Fifth Season: HeartCatch PreCure! → Heart Catch Precure.
- Sixth Season: Suite PreCure → Suite Precure.
- Seventh Season: Smile PreCure! → Smile Precure.
- Eighth Season: DokiDoki! PreCure → DokiDoki! Precure.
- Ninth Season: HappinessCharge Pretty Cure! → Happiness Charge Precure!.
- Tenth Season: Go! Princess Pretty Cure → Go! Princess Precure.
- Eleventh Season: Witchy Pretty Cure! → Witchy Precure!
- Twelfth Season: Kirakira Pretty Cure a la Mode → KiraKira PreCure a la Mode[b].
- Thirteenth Season: Hug! PreCure → Hug! Precure.
- Fourteenth Season: Star Twinkle PreCure → Star Twinkle Precure.
- Fifteenth Season: Healin' Good Pretty Cure → Healin' Good Precure.
- Sixteenth Season: Tropical-Rouge! Pretty Cure → Tropical-Rouge! Precure.
- Seventeenth Season: Delicious Party Pretty Cure → Delicious Party Precure.
- Eighteenth Season: Soaring Sky! Pretty Cure → Soaring Sky! Precure.
- Nineteenth Season: Wonderful Pretty Cure! → Wonderful Precure!.
- Twentieth Season: You and Idol Pretty Cure → You and Idol Precure. HelloYu0910 (talk) 22:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Alright then, let me list it again to see if it's okay to do it this way.
- I'm saying everything except the first season should be Precure because that's what they're getting released as. And yea, I think there's gonna be more because they're coming out at a really fast clip even though its with little fanfair at the moment (I usually find out when I log into Reddit), with the release rate speeding up dramatically starting in 2024. The last release was Yes! in December, barely two months ago, and we doubled the back catalog shows by the end of the year. Rebochan (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- I'm fine with these proposed page moves. Historyday01 (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please remember that "PreCure", "Precure" and "Pretty Cure" are used differently, so please choose wisely. HelloYu0910 (talk) 11:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Rebochan @Historyday01 Okay, so, let us conclude and discuss every season from PreCure series the final time so that we're all make sure that we're on the same page.
- They even undid my moves related to the first series, when that discussion (on Talk:Futari wa Pretty Cure) got reopened. So now we're back to using the Japanese name because *shrug*. Rebochan (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. I completely agree with the previous statement ending this discussion, and I'm unsure why this was reopened. My stance in favor of the changed page names remains. I'm sorry that another editor undid your work. That's not right. I call for this discussion to be closed, again, this time by an admin who ISN'T a sock. Isn't it the job of Wikipedia admins to crack down on sock accounts?Historyday01 (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I just did all the moves today and another editor reviewed all of them and reverted them. I am done with this discussion. Fix the pages or don't, I'm not doing the work again because that took most of a day based on following Wikipedia's rules. Getting scolded for following the rules is not worth the time. My arguments don't change, we have the primary sources so I don't even know why this is controversial. Rebochan (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
Notes
- ^ It's because Crunchyroll's title is PreCure Splash Star, so we're going to stay unchanged for this one.
- ^ It's because Crunchyroll's title is KIRA KIRA☆PRECURE A LA MODE, so we will have to use Toei Animation USA for this one.
Requested move 19 February 2025
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: procedural close as previous discussion has been reopened. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC) Elli (talk | contribs) 21:50, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Wonderful PreCure! → Wonderful Precure!
- List of Wonderful PreCure! episodes → List of Wonderful Precure! episodes
- You and Idol PreCure → You and Idol Precure
- List of You and Idol PreCure episodes → List of You and Idol Precure episodes
– @Anime1990, #Requested move 12 February 2025. The disscussion was moved to "Wonderful Precure!" and "You and Idol Precure" instead of "Wonderful PreCure!" and "You and Idol PreCure", beside Crunchyroll and Toei Animation USA's official title used "Precure" instead of "PreCure" for these season. So, it should be change it to "Precure" instead "PreCure". HelloYu0910 (talk) 15:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Look we just, JUST, had a consensus for PreCure. Why are we literally starting this over? Rebochan (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- I would just ignore their request. This whole request is a faulty one. Historyday01 (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- This move request is a faulty one and unnecessary on many, many levels. We already have a consensus for the previous one. I completely oppose these moves. Historyday01 (talk) 18:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- The closer of the previous discussion was blocked for sockpuppetry, meaning it's possible that discussion will be reopened. I don't know if that's what will happen, as we have guidance at WP:SOCKSTRIKE, I didn't see anything in my brief scan about what we do when the sock closed a discussion - so I am leaving that to an admin to deal with, but wanted to let everyone here know. If it is reopened, I think it would be appropriate to hold off on this, or if the editors here agree this can just be closed as premature. ASUKITE 21:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)