Jump to content

Talk:2014 Veterans Health Administration controversy/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peaceray (talk · contribs) 01:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


This article qualifies as a Good Article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    I think that this article does a great job in describing the scandal in layman's terms. Much of the government source material was generated by wiktionary:policy wonk's, & this article summarized those works well.

    To check for copyvios, I ran it through User:CorenSearchBot/manual. The result was that Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014, as of 05:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC), did not appear to be a copyright violation.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    It is well-cited & uses over seven dozen sources without over-citation. During the course of my review, I was bold in assuring improving the consistency of the citations by putting them in citation formats, adding parameters, & the like. There are no broken links at this time.
    B. Citations to reliable sources:
    Links to a variety of news & government (executive & legislative) sources & at least one NGO source.
    C. No original research:
    Everything is drawn from the sources.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    There are five images from Commons. Three are in the Public Domain; the remaining two are CC BY-SA 3.0.
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Well done!
Peaceray (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Peaceray! --Pine 07:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]