Talk:USS Wolverine (IX-64)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Wolverine (IX-64) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Chicago Mid‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Top speed

The text says it did well to hit 20 knots, but the info box says 28 knots. Could someone verify which figure is more accurate? Thanks. Edison 17:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

The article states that the conversion began in May 1942, and that she began her new job in January 1942. Probably should have been January 1943 since she was not fitted with a Wayback machine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.244.76 (talk) 18:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

The article states that the conversion began in May 1942, and that she began her new job in January 1942. Probably should have been January 1943 since she was not fitted with a Wayback machine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.37.244.76 (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

I've never heard of a paddle steamer (sic!) that is able to make 28 knots. And 8000 shp are simply not enough for this speed - an Arleigh Burke class destroyer, having a similar hull length, makes around 30 knots, but has more than ten times as much machine power! I guess that a figure of 18 knots while assuming a typo error (28 <-> 18) is more probable, and in the range of a fast paddle steamer. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 06:39, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

L IonlyPlayz (talk) 01:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote "a" misleading

While footnote "a" is correct in saying that GRT is not the same as modern GT, it is in error in vaguely saying "It is likely, though not specified, one of several measures of Gross Register Tonnage of the registering authority and time". GRT was used for assessing taxes, and the procedure for calculating it was specified by the US Treasury for US registered ships. This is clearly stated in the cited reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:300:C7C0:944A:4642:458E:E3F4 (talk) 23:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name of article

The name of the article should remain Wolverine, as that is what the ship is most known for. As Seeandbee, the vessel was just another random vessel plying the Great Lakes, with an extremely non-notable history. Llammakey (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]