Talk:USS Bonhomme Richard (1765)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Bonhomme Richard (1765) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Shipwrecks High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal USS Bonhomme Richard (1765) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Americans?

It was my understanding that the Bonhomme Richard was crewed mostly by French sailors and marines under the command of the Continental Navy. Throughout the article, however, it references the "Americans" aboard her.

Edit: "Ships and Seaman of the American Revolution" by Jack Coggins (1969) states the crew was made up of "...187 crewmen, 81 British, 62 Americans, 29 Portugese, 10 Scandinavians, and 5 others. Besides these were 36 French landsmen (cooks, stewards, etc.) and a force of 137 French Marines. The total compliment, including officers, totaled 380." The book is unfortunately unclear as to the makeup of the officers.

Maybe...

All men onboard were, following Coggins' figures, 360. Let's asume to complete the 380, that 20 were officers (whose nationality is to determine, even if the odds are in favour of frenchmen). The percentages for the remaining 360, including the 137 French Marines, are: French: 48 %; British: 22.5 %, Americans: 17,22 %; Portugese: 8.05%; Scandinavians: 2.78%; others: 1.39%. All this, plus the ships previous owner, should explain the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.110.110.81 (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonhomme: Poor?

The French word for "poor" is "pauvre". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.254.42.211 (talk) 01:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

"Bonhomme" means "good man" which in those days was a way of reffering to a man of nominal means, as the old way of thinking that money is inherently dirty and more money makes one not as "nice." That's also where the phrase "the filthy rich comes from." So literally you're right, it isn't the French for "poor." But it was the connotation for the day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.160.51 (talk) 00:48, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

News on Search for Wreck

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/jun/16/usa Shady18n (talk) 18:23, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where was she built?

The article has "built in France", but the info box has "Builder: Randall & Brent Shipyards", which were in Rotherhithe on the River Thames in London. --Robkam (talk) 15:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Half of a ship of the Line

She was a sixth-rate frigate, she was *not* a line-of-battle ship. There is no comparison. For one thing, 64-gun ships of the line were uncommon by the Revolutionary War and unheard-of by the end of the century; look up the line of battle for the Battle of the Chesapeake. I realize Americans have a vested interest in making it seem like JPJ was in command of something more consequential than a rowboat, but the difference between a 44-gun ship with 12-pounder cannon, and a 64-gun or 74-gun ship of the line with 24- and 36-pound cannon cannot be compared, and certainly not by diving by the number of guns as if that were the only thing that mattered. A 3.5 foot child is not equivalent to half of a 7-foot viking warrior. 67.160.133.226 (talk) 03:12, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"USS"

Adding the designation "USS" to ships of the United States Navy did not become normal practice until the turn of the 20th century (during the Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt). So... the Bonhomme Richard was never actually designated with "USS" at the time she was in service. Obviously the designation has been retroactively applied. What I would like to know is if that retroactive application is "official" (ie approved by the Navy or Congress or something) and if so, when was it made official? Blueboar (talk) 14:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News from the wreck Nov2018

https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/wreck-of-american-warship-which-sank-in-1779-discovered-off-yorkshire-coast-1-9430425 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:7F46:B601:DDBF:98E5:69FE:9972 (talk) 23:20, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stack, marine. Can more be added?

Can more be added about Stack? 65.39.82.84 (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]