Talk:Spanning Tree Protocol
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spanning Tree Protocol article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Bridge protocol data unit page were merged into Spanning Tree Protocol on 2024-03-16. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Algorhymes rock!
[edit]Please add more specifications like this. Very nice. =) STP was designed to monitor and control the Layer2 Network, it has different variations like RSTP,MSTP and PVST+.
yes for my career prospectus, please add RSTP, MSTP
yet another vote - merge the 3.
Merge
[edit]Since all of the articles discuss a form of the STP algorithm, they should be merged under one twiki page.
User: ftmkx
- Rapid Spanning Tree Protocol was merged. We still have a separate Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol article. ~Kvng (talk) 02:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
PortFast
[edit]There is no mention of Cisco's PortFast STP optimization in this article or elsewhere on Wikipedia. My understanding is that when enabled, PortFast puts a port into forwarding mode immediately after link is established. This gives end stations immediate connectivity at the expense of the possibility of a brief storm if the connection results in a loop. I believe the PortFast option was incorporated into the RSTP enhancement but I need someone to verify this before editing the article. Meanwhile, I've removed recent edit claiming that Blocking is the initial state for STP. While the statement is true for the original 802.1D, it needs some qualification given the above. --Kvng (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
- Still no discussion of portfast here or elsewhere on Wikipedia. ~Kvng (talk) 02:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Merge from Bridge protocol data unit
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was merge due to lack of discussion. OrdinaryGiraffe (talk) 23:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Spanning Tree Protocol § Bridge protocol data units already appears to be more comprehensive than Bridge protocol data unit so the latter is likely not necessary. Anything not already covered here can be merged and Bridge protocol data unit turned into a redirect. ~Kvng (talk) 14:30, 20 August 2023 (UTC)