Talk:Solheim Cup

Golf Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport: Golf High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's golf task force.

How come the name?

Er, who/what is the tournament named after? I'd say that would be a highly relevant fact to include in this article. --Wernher 17:32, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dealt with. Osomec 14:28, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! :-) From the look of his name, I did suspect he might be a Norwegian-American, and lo and behold, so he was, I now see from the article on him. --Wernher 00:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Links to individual events

To link to a specific Solheim Cup this page has links like: 2011 Details whereas the Ryder Cup has e.g.: 2012, i.e. the year is the link.

Presidents Cup is similar to this page having e.g.: 2009 details (although using Template:DetailsLink) but most other Golf pages simply have the year being the link e.g.: Walker Cup, Lexus Cup, Open Championship, Masters Tournament, U.S. Open (golf), WGC-Cadillac Championship, etc.

Shouldn't it be consistent? Nigej 08:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I think the format should be the one that makes the article most usable. It may be impossible to be consistent across all articles since many editors are involved. I favor the use of "Details" sd on Presidents Cup because I think the fact that the year links may not be as obvious as it could be to many readers. I don't have an opinion on style, upper case or italics, doesn't matter to me. --Crunch (talk) 23:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Solheim Cup

Shouldn't the Junior Solheim Cup be a separate page? Currently Junior Solheim Cup redirects to Solheim Cup#Junior Solheim Cup. We have a Junior Ryder Cup page currently which is not part of the Ryder Cup page. Nigej (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd support moving the JSC content to a separate page. Tewapack (talk) 16:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Solheim Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029202635/http://www.solheimcupusa.com/news/~/~/media/E9E40E111635497886DEDEC8F18E8992.ashx to http://www.solheimcupusa.com/news/~/~/media/E9E40E111635497886DEDEC8F18E8992.ashx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]