Talk:SMS Geier

SMS Geier has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

SMS Geier is part of the Unprotected cruisers of Germany series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 9, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 8, 2014	Good topic candidate	Promoted
September 28, 2016	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Underwater diving Low‑importance

	Underwater diving portal This article is part of WikiProject Underwater diving, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve Underwater diving-related articles to a feature-quality standard, and to comprehensively cover the topic with quality encyclopedic articles.Underwater divingWikipedia:WikiProject Underwater divingTemplate:WikiProject Underwater divingUnderwater diving
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article creation

Sourced information on this ship was in the article Geier and was removed when that article was converted to a dab page in this edit. I have copied it here to form this stub. PamD (talk) 14:15, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Geier/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 19:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
prose: (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

1. evaded her pursuers. Who were her pursuers?

Should be more clear now. Thanks for the review. Parsecboy (talk) 21:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ya that's fine :) Thurgate (talk) 22:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Good job Parsec. Thurgate (talk) 22:10, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Classification of SMS Geier (or multiple vessels?)

In finding and inserting a link to SMS Geier in the German Samoa article, I came across what seems to be very inconsistent classification of SMS Geier in various Wikipedia articles. In the German Samoa article its called a "small gunboat" , in SMS Geier a "light cruiser" , and in Geier a "sloop" (currently changed to "cruiser" ). I'm fairly certain all articles refer to the same ship. I found a short history of the SMS Geier as well as several pictures of it on a blog,[1] but it unfortunately doesn't have any references.

Mojowiha (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As built, the ship was classified as a "klein kreuzer" (small cruiser - what the Germans called their light cruisers). Over time, as light cruisers grew in size, Geier was no longer comparable to newer ships, and so these other classifications were applied by various authors. As far as I know, the German Navy never changed her classification. Parsecboy (talk) 11:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, that certainly seems to argue for a consistent application of the "light cruiser" designation. Well, I guess that's settled then. Thanks for your time Parsecboy.

Mojowiha (talk) 11:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Sovereign Immunity"? Terry Thorgaard (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

I see that the reference linked in note 12 refers to "Sovereign Immunity" and the "Statement on United States Policy for the Protection of Sunken Warships" (January 19, 2001). However I fail to agree that the cited policy has anything to do with the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. Someone desiring to dive to the wreck is apparently prohibited from taking anything because (says the US government),"no portion of a government wreck may be disturbed or removed, and any unauthorized removal of any property from a U.S. Navy wreck is illegal". No one wants to sue the government (and that is what sovereign immunity is all about). Terry Thorgaard (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some books that discuss the issue: 1, 2, and 3, and there are many others if you'd like to read further. Thanks, Parsecboy (talk) 17:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]