Talk:Pop (NSYNC song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pop (NSYNC song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

On 18 July 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Pop (song). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 18 July 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pop (NSYNC song) → Pop (song)
Pop! (Nayeon song) → Pop! (song)

– Revert per WP:SMALLDETAILS. RMXY (talk) 02:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I might normally support it, but in this case it's liable to cause confusion with pop song, so it doesn't really assist with navigation in any way. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't think small details should apply when the article titles still have to have a parenthetical disambiguator. Small details should only apply as a form of natural disambiguation to avoid the need for a parenthetical disambiguator. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1st per Zxcvbnm point about pop song as well as per SMALLDETAILS which generally only works with a spelling variant not the absence of a variant. Support 2nd as the variant (the addition of the "!") appears to make this one unique. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support both. The NSYNC song is the only song with an article with the base name Pop, so should carry the standard qualifier per WP:SONGDAB. Pop! (song) is the only song with the base name Pop!, so likewise should be disambiguated as Pop! (song) per WP:SONGDAB. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The absence of the "!" doesn't make in unique as its a variant of "Pop" per WP:SMALLDETAILS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:41, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.