Talk:Paul Boutin

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Paul Boutin (talk · contribs) / Boutin, Paul Boutin, Paul

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

~~This should probably be split into two pages; I'm unsure of how to go about fixing that, though.~~ I figured it out, moved it, and disambiguated.-GlamdringCookies 01:19, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paul wrote a piece on how to try to prevent Wikipedians from finding out that you're breaking WP:AUTO (editing your own entry to make you "seem important"). -- Jeandré, 2007-01-09t11:47z

I'm putting some links here, from which a fellow Wikipedian who knows the protocol better than me offered to flesh out the required sourcing for this entry.

paragraph 2 - links to published work https://www.wired.com/2003/07/slammer/ http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/president-obama-abandons-twitter https://www.technologyreview.com/s/426438/the-law-of-online-sharing/ http://www.newsweek.com/secretive-world-selling-data-about-you-464789 http://gawker.com/368529/the-250 (Valleywag!) http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-05-28/in-tech-s-batman-v-superman-gawker-s-nick-denton-sets-a-trap-for-peter-thiel (Bloomberg Businessweek, recent)

Josh Levin's quote about me, which is so accurate about my work, is lost from the Internet (and not in the Internet Archive.) I could ask him to dig it up from an old email if it would be useful.

paragraph 4 - work references http://simson.net/ref/athena/Athena_Open_To_Students.pdf (Project Athena staff list from 1985) http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2006/08/you_are_what_you_search.html (written while at, and using, Splunk. a very popular piece that Steven Levy included in an anthology - http://arstechnica.com/features/2008/03/book-review-2008-03

Bonus points if you can get my Onion appearance into WP! :-) http://www.theonion.com/article/factual-error-found-on-internet-102

Updated citations

The article subject contacted me to see if I could put his citations above in the article and remove the now-ancient notice at the top. We're friends, but see-each-other-every-few-years friends, so I don't feel like I have a big conflict of interest here. I have added assorted citations, put in one inline citation request, and removed the giant box. Feel free to drop me a note if you'd like to discuss. -- William Pietri (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]