Talk:Odoric of Pordenone

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Citations?

This article is awfully light on citations. For example, no sources are footnoted in the section arguing why we should view Odoric's journey as a diplomatic mission. The article also presumes a definite chronology to Odoric that does not exist. The only date we can be sure of is his death. The 1296 date of his missionary departure seems completely fabricated. Article should be revised with consideration of critical scholarship like A.C. Moule's 1920 article "A Life of Odoric" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.237.163.60 (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

i changed "despatched" to "dispatched" hope no one minds.

you bastard.

Dates wrong

This says he was born around 1286 and went as a missionary in 1296, which would make him only 10 years old. That cannot be right. The source for the 1296 date says he was born in 1265, which makes more sense. Maybe 1286 is just a typo? Gobanian (talk) 10:33, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it says he was accepted into the Order in 1296, and his journey started in "1316-1318". Older sources differ on his date of birth, with "c. 1286" being commonest. However in its current state the article body has 1280 due to forensic research but the 1286 Births Category. For now I'll change the category but the uncertainty should be noted. David Brooks (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Czech version of his name

Czech wikipedia claims that his name is coming from the Czech name Oldřich (http://cs.wiki.x.io/wiki/Old%C5%99ich) and instead of the mysterious Mattiusi family, it is more likely that his father was Matúš (older version of Matouš, or a Czech version of Matthew).

Ceplm (talk) 00:08, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]