Talk:Bloober Team

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bloober Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120819042546/http://www.a-men-game.com:80/ to http://www.a-men-game.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Future Fight from cancelled games?

I think Future Fight may have actually fully released, as there are entries for it on sites like metacritic, that list Bloober as the developers:

https://www.metacritic.com/game/ios/future-fight

https://www.metacritic.com/game/psp/future-fight

Game FAQs also has a couple entries for it:

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/psp/998183-future-fight/stats

The game most likely flopped, as I can't really find too much about it, but it appears that some semblance of the original idea did make it out to the PSP and iPad. FuzzWW (talk) 00:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted addition of commas

I recently made an edit to the Cancelled Games section, adding commas before "for" for the first, third and fourth entries. Being present in the second entry, I felt the comma helped differentiate the game's title from the platform it's for, eg. keeping one title from reading as "the battle for iOS". The edit got reverted with a "Not enumarations" [sic] summary, which restored the article to having a comma in only one of the four bullet points. Unless there's a clear reason not to, I'd think we're better off adding the commas back in. uKER (talk) 11:25, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The commas in the previously proposed format were grammatically incorrect. There is usually no need to demarcate titles with commas, since they are already highlighted by italics. If readability is a pressing issue, I have proposed an alternative format here. IceWelder [✉] 18:49, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That looks perfect. Thanks! --uKER (talk) 12:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]