Talk:Makuuchi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Makuuchi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

yokozuna

i don't think the list of notable yokozuna is needed, just a list of active ones, like ozeki XinJeisan 09:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. It certainly seems too much in a combined article. Malnova 10:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just wanted to look up the names of some of the yokozuna of recent decades as I was not able to remember them correctly. I would have loved to find those here, at least those of the recent past. JB. --92.195.97.156 (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kachikoshi for sekiwakes and komusubis

Can a sekiwake (or a komusubi) always maintain his rank by getting kachikoshi, or are there examples of sekiwakes that got kachikoshi and still got demoted? I don't know the answer but perhaps the article could be more clear about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.150.116.86 (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, one cannot be demoted if one gets kachikoshi. Several rikishi such as Sakahoko, Wakanosato and Kotomitsuki have remained at the rank for many tournaments on end by getting their majority of wins but not doing well enough to earn promotion to ozeki. Only a losing score results in demotion. It can happen with komusubi too, although one is less likely to get "stuck" at that rank.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 00:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the komusubi section is written "It is also the lowest rank where achieving a kachi-koshi (winning record in a tournament) is no longer sufficient to guarantee promotion to a higher rank." This is not correct. There are many cases of a Maegashira 1 getting kachi-koshi but not being promoted to komusubi when both of the komusubi maintained their ranks. Since 2015, three people at Maegashira 1 have been denied promotion with 9-6 records, even better than 8-7. In general, kachi-koshi does not guarantee promotion at any rank. It only guarantees no demotion. 46.18.148.31 (talk) 10:46, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bilingual Commentary

The lower divisions are shown on their satellite coverage, with only makuuchi broadcast having bilingual commentary.

Might one inquire as to the second language, in addition to Japanese, of this commentary? English? Mandarin? Cantonese? Malay? Tagalog? Dick Kimball (talk) 14:09, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor change to Sekiwake table

Takatōriki is was listed as highest rank 'Ōzeki' on the most Sekiwake appearances table. However, on his personal page and elsewhere I could find, this isn't indicated. Looks like a basic error. He did run an Ōzeki stable though. I am unaware of that influencing his highest rank achieved, so I went ahead and changed it. I corrected the table for him to highest rank 'Sekiwake' based on this information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zkbt (talk • contribs) 15:44, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; he never went beyond sekiwake. Neither did Kotonishiki actually, so I've corrected that too.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 19:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching and fixing these. I am not sure what happened as I know neither of these two men ever made ozeki. If you have a minute please check the other tables for me as well for any discrepancies. FourTildes (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed Shodai from the list of active sekiwake, since he appears in the list of active Ozeki. My apologies if there was some reason for him appearing in both lists.Weka511 (talk) 20:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Weka511, you were correct to remove him. I actually don't know why we are keeping lists of "active sekiwake" and "active komusubi", seeing as how they change nearly every tournament. It should be reserved for the yokozuna and ozeki ranks, which are much more stable.-- P-K3 (talk) 20:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some ambiguity

1) in ozeki description it says Technically there must always be a minimum of two ōzeki on the banzuke, one on the east side and one on the west. If there are fewer than two regular ōzeki in practice, then one or more yokozuna will be designated "yokozuna-ōzeki".

in overview it says There must be at least one sekiwake and komusubi on each side of the banzuke [no mention of ozeki], normally two total, but there may be more.

so which is it? what is the technical minimum for ozeki, 1 or 2?

2)overview: If there is more than one yokozuna but only one ōzeki ... yokozuna-ōzeki

What if there is exactly one yokozuna and one ozeki ??

3)overview: Therefore, a reference to san'yaku can sometimes mean only the bottom three ranks, or in other cases only sekiwake and komusubi.

I assume underlined refers to ozeki, sekiwake and komusubi?
Can san'yaku also refer to all four top ranks? 213.149.51.93 (talk) 20:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]