Talk:Loveland Living Planet Aquarium

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Loveland Living Planet Aquarium article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo

It is requested that an image or photograph of Loveland Living Planet Aquarium be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Multiple issues

Posting this here since Elisfkc did not create a section. Why is this tagged with "primary sources" issues? There are four reliable sources establishing the notability. Beyond establishing that, the best source for information on exhibits and happenings at the aquarium is the aquarium itself. Rather than tag it, how about going through the four third-party sources and finding where else they can be used in the article? Drive-by taggings are not usually that helpful. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because out of the 11 references, 7 of them are from the aquarium themselves. It's just a notice on the page, not a deletion nomination. --Elisfkc (talk) 23:35, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: Did I say it was a deletion nomination? I don't see where I said anything about that. Please don't imply this is about something it's not. As I said, it makes sense that most of the facts about the aquarium are from the aquarium itself. Once notability has been established, there is nothing which says that primary sources can't be used. Again, why don't you try fixing things instead of doing a driving-by tagging? ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I miscounted. Five of the references are from third-party reliable sources, so only six of them are from the aquarium. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but still, a majority of them are from the aquarium, hence the primary sources tag. Elisfkc (talk) 01:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]