Talk:K. Visalini

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 December 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the K. Visalini article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 7 January 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Procedural page move. Article title moved back to K. Visalini. Thanks and kudos to nom for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 08:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kumarasamy Visalini → K. Visalini –I made a bad page move by accident, not knowing what a patronymic Indian name is like. aeschylus (talk) 02:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 3 June 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Revert undiscussed move and move back to K. Visalini. The results of #Requested move 7 January 2024 were reverted because the AfD was open at the time; that should no longer be a concern. (closed by non-admin page mover) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 13:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kumarasamy Visalini → K Visalini – Following Patronymic Indian name. I made bad move and can't reverse it. aeschylus (talk) 18:00, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move to K. Visalini. Does appear to be her common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:11, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Her IQ

There is no IQ Test, that nearly measures up to 225 with a standard deviation of 15, which is most common.You can't construct an IQ Tests, that measures that far, as you need a large enough sample size in that area, as IQ is a value of comparison, with others. Thus tests like Wechsler or Binet have a ceiling of 160 (SD 15). Looking at the gaussian distribution (IQ follows a gaussian distribution with a mean of 100) it's highly unlikely that someone had that IQ in the entirety of humanity. 2001:4DD0:3961:0:DDB6:E36F:5798:D792 (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can take that up with the sources that cite it--or take issue with those sources. Otherwise it's really just a forum discussion. Drmies (talk) 01:01, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]