This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
I'm going to see this film soon. The page on the director describes it as a "mockumentary", is this true? Cheers, Tompsci01:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alex, you wrote: "This film has fallen into public domain as well as all other films released this year." Which year do you mean? The infobox shows it was released in 1922 in Sweden and 1929 in the USA. And which copyright law are you referring to? A fuller explanation of why the film has fallen into public domain would be welcome. Thanks. --Richardrjtalk email18:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. Presumably, then, the sentence should specify that it is referring to US public domain (but then why no other jurisdictions?), should read 1922 rather than "this year" (to remove the ambiguity), and should include the public domain reference you cite. I won't make these changes, though, in case you disagree with any of them. --Richardrjtalk email05:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article is missing some key points of information on the film, information on the film's reception and legacy needs to be added to the article. Also the article is missing a great deal of citations of its material which should be fixed. These issues need to be fixed in order to make the article more well developed than its current state.--Paleface Jack (talk) 18:15, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]