Talk:Frankfurt National Assembly

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 18, 2008 and May 18, 2010.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

Former countries: Prussia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Schleswig-Holstein

... since Schleswig's population was mostly Danish ...

... Because of the growing national consciousness of the predominantly German population in the two duchies ...

So... was Schleswig mainly a duchy of Danes or of Germans? Or is there actually no conflict, and the second text means that S-H seen as a whole had mainly German inhabitants? Then maybe the text could be rephrased to state this more clearly. clacke 23:15, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schleswig was mixed, and still is: German part of Schleswig still has a Danish minority (and Frisians) and the Danish part Norther Schleswig/South Jutland still has a tiny German minority — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.5.184.243 (talk) 10:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Expansion

I've expanded by replacing the previous version with a translation of the featured German wikipedia article. I hope no-one objects. It would be nice of someone could tweak the schematic image of the constitution... athinaios | Talk 15:36, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

working on copyedits

--Auntieruth55 (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re-assessment?

Why is this article still rated start class? It seems that the article was substantially expanded based on a translation from the German article, which has been rated a featured article. It may be warranted to re-assess the article.--Mschiffler (talk) 19:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bias?

Does the sentence "Craftsmen like Robert Blum or Wilhelm Wolff were associated almost exclusively with the radical democratic Left, as they knew the social problems of the underprivileged classes from personal observations" not imply that anyone with a personal observation of the underprivileged classes will be a member of the radical democratic left? That is not a tenable or correct statement, surely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 07:38, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Additional Information

Please see Draft:Frankfurt Assembly. Please add any information from the draft that is not already in this article to this article. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:57, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]