Talk:E3 1995

Video games High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

A photo showing the Los Angeles Convention Center promoting E3 1995

All that the article needs now is a picture of the Los Angeles Convention Center with a banner promoting E3 1995 so it can be added to the infobox. Do The Math (talk) 21:43, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh here, besides a lot of information about it - but don't know if they can actually be used, only registered users can modify them on the site - there is a photo of the Los Angeles Convention Center with a banner. Very low resolution, I don't know how to upload, but maybe it can be useful. Lone Internaut (talk) 10:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lone Internaut: Cool! BTW, if you want to expand the section containing the list of games that were showcased at E3 1995, feel free to do so!. I searched for every magazine possible that covered the event. Do The Math (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The list of games seems to me quite complete. Unfortunately it is an event edition as important as it is old now. I do not even have paper material of the time for more coverage. The amount of information that you managed to find is incredible, congratulations. Lone Internaut (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"$299" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect $299 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10 § $299 until a consensus is reached. Okmrman (talk) 22:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]