Talk:Comparison of project management software

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 25 February 2011, see discussion.
delete, 17 October 2005, see discussion.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Computing: Software Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).

Lists High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Microsoft requesting edits

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

Hello, my name is Patricia Wagner and I'm an employee of Microsoft. I work in the Cloud+Enterprise division as a content publisher for Visual Studio Team Services, Team Foundation Server, and Application Lifecycle Management products. We are reviewing Wikipedia articles that relate to our areas and would like to update some to better represent the current state and features of our products. Please review the changes below and let me know if they are acceptable to you. Thank you very much for your consideration.

In the "General information" section, please update the "Microsoft Team Foundation Server" entry to read:
Microsoft Team Foundation Server Yes Yes Yes Proprietary ASP.NET, C##, Java, Python, PHP

Add a new entry just below it:

Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services Yes No Yes Proprietary ASP.NET, C##, Java, Python, PHP

In the "Features" section, please add a new line after the Microsoft Team Foundation Server entry that reads:

Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes

In the "Monetary features" section, please add a new line after the Microsoft Team Foundation Server entry that reads: Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services No No No

Pat MSFT (talk) 18:57, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pat MSFT. I don't see that we have a Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services article on Wikipedia. This list article is for listing entires for which there are already articles (see WP:WTAF). Could you please clarify if there is an article about Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services, perhaps under a different name?- Mr X 19:33, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MrX, Thank you for your comment. You are correct. There isn't a dedicated article for "Visual Studio Team Services." That product is under the Visual Studio umbrella, in the article "Microsoft Visual Studio" (http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Microsoft_Visual_Studio#Team_Services) in the “Team Services” section. Please let me know if you need more information. Thank you again!

If Visual Studio Team Services is just the internet version of Team Foundation Server, then I don't see why it would need separate entries on this list. Perhaps I'm missing something. Are these actually unique project management software products, or just different flavors of the same development platform, of which project management is a feature?- Mr X 21:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Allura

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Apache Allura

https://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura/wiki/Feature%20Comparison/

I have added the software to each of the three tables. You, or someone else, will need to fill in the specific features. I don't think anyone will object to you editing the article provided that you don't add promotional content or external links.- Mr X 19:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CA Clarity PPM/CA PPM

http://www.ca.com/us/products/ca-project-portfolio-management.html In 2005, CA bought Niku Portfolio Manager for $350M and renamed it to Clarity. Recently the tool was renamed to CA PPM but it is still known as Clarity PPM. http://de.wiki.x.io/wiki/Clarity

Danielperezglez (talk) 09:31, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel. That article is on the German Wikipedia. There needs to be an article on the English Wikipedia for a product to be added to this list. Altamel (talk) 01:35, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CA Clarity PPM/CA PPM is a well known tool. It should be added to the list of comparisions. https://www.ca.com/us/products/project-portfolio-management.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxammuxx (talk • contribs) 14:21, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See above. The requirement for entries in such large product lists on English Wikipedia is a stand-alone article on English Wikipedia, that must be based on multiple independent reliable sources (ideally with non-promotional information). Unless such an article is created or the current consensus changes, other entries will get rejected. GermanJoe (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 July 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can you please add the product Project Plan 365 to the comparison. See www.projectplan365.com for details. I can also provide all the data needed, but essentially all the check boxes are the same as those found for Microsoft Project. You can discuss with further: jigs@pcatww.com. Thx! 27.34.17.93 (talk) 05:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. If that item does not have a Wikipedia page, it porbably should not be included. --Izno (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC) Izno (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Our product disappeared from the list

Hello, I just noticed our product 10,000ft has been removed from this list. How can I find out when and who removed it and why? shyam-habarakada (talk) 22:41, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Shyamh:, the article was deleted after consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/10,000ft. Please note that articles on Wikipedia must be based on multiple independent reliable sources to establish the topic's notability (see WP:GNG). Wikipedia is not a free promotional platform or a comprehensive product listing. As an editor with a conflict of interest please make sure to read Wikipedia's guidelines at WP:COI and WP:PAID. GermanJoe (talk) 22:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GermanJoe, thanks for the quick response. I’m confused about what constitutes a notable company vs not and how to reestablish our company page as well as restore these entries in the lists. We are not unlike some other companies and products listed here already. Can you help point me to how to make this the right way? shyam-habarakada (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll post some general advice on your user talkpage, as it is not directly related to this list. See User talk:Shyamh for more info. GermanJoe (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 December 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add ITM Platform software to the list:

General information NicoloITM (talk) 09:38, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. HINDWIKI • CHAT 14:59, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Need to add ITM Platform to the list:

General Information:

Web based: Yes Hosted on premises: Yes SaaS: Yes License: Unknown Programming language: [empty]

Features:

Collaborative software: Yes Issue Tracjing: No Scheduling: Yes Project Portfolio Management: Yes Resource management: Yes Document Management: Yes Workflow systems: Yes Reporting and analyses: Yes

Monetary features: Budget management: Yes Time tracking: Yes Invoicing: No

References/sources: Third party articles: https://www.girlsguidetopm.com/software-review-itm-platform-2017/ User reviews: https://www.capterra.com/p/147990/ITM-Platform/ Official website: http://www.itmplatform.com ITM Platform (talk) 13:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The list is restricted to "notable" entries (see WP:GNG for Wikipedia's notability criteria), which already have a sourced stand-alone article. Please see also WP:COI for more information about "conflict of interest" editing on Wikipedia. GermanJoe (talk) 13:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Would it be possible, to add our product as well?
If yes, the data is as follows:

General Information
Software: Agile Kanban
Web Based: Yes
Hosted On-Premises: Yes
SaaS: Yes
License: Proprietary
Programming Language: ASP.Net MVC / JavaScript

Features:
Collaborative Software: Yes
Issue Tracking System: Yes
Scheduling: Yes
Project Portfolio Management: No
ResourceManagement: Yes
Document Management: Yes, it is possible to upload and assign documents to project tasks
Worflow System: No
Reporting and Analyses: Yes

Monetary features:
Budget Management: No
Time Tracking: Yes
Invoicing: No

It would be nice, if we could be in this list.
If you have any questions, please contact me at mailto:franz.kiermaier@software-creative.de
You can check out our solution on https://www.agile-kanban.com Thank you in advance. Franz.kiermaier (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: See the request above. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:34, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I would like to add our company, "Effitrac Solutions India Private Limited" to this comparison list. Effitrac is a leading ERP Software consultancy. At Effitrac, we offer the best ever ERP Software Solutions compared to our predecessors. We have over 15,000 users at over 6 verticals and we are always at their goodwill. Hence, it would prove useful if we can add the comparison of Effitrac to this list. Thank you 118.185.2.146 (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Additions need to be "notable" with their own independently-sourced article (see WP:GNG). And frankly, promotional language like "the best ever ERP Software" is never acceptable here. Any kind of advertising is prohibited. I strongly recommend to read through WP:COI for editors with a conflict of interest. GermanJoe (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2018

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Suggest to add ionBIZ as software for comparison. ionBIZ is projectmanagement software developped by ionprojects (http://ionprojects.com). I can help filling in the feature details etc.

Kind regards, Dimitri Op de Beeck Dimitri Op de Beeck (talk) 09:55, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No thank you. As noted above, many times, this does not meet the criteria for inclusion on this list. Kuru (talk) 11:18, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taiga not listed?

Say, I just noticed Taiga (project management) isn't listed. Was this just an oversight, or is there a particular reason it's not listed? Thanks, 136.62.254.174 (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Good morning, sir, we visited with interest this page, which summarizes many software for project management. We would also like to include the software developed by us, CARDINIS PPM SUITE, which has been available on the market for twenty years and which has now reached release 7. In particular, our software has been developed taking into account the guidelines of the SME and is one of the few software that is centered on WBS, a key concept for PMs.

The product can handle installations of any size, is used in different sectors, from banking, to food and beverage, in retail, fashion and automotive. It is available in both on-premise and Saas modes and can be fully customised and integrated with Issue Tracking systems (e.g. Atlassian Jira). We can provide both customer references and detailed information.

www.cardinis.com

Thank you very much. Giancarlo Borso giancarlo.borso@gft.com

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator Giancarlo.borso (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 July 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

KlausUhlmann (talk) 11:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear author,

please add the Software factro to your list (see www.factro.de - its language is changeable from german to english) - it is Web-based = YES; not hosted on-premise = NO; Saas = YES; Proprietary; with programming language JavaScript

the features are: Collaborating software = YES; Issue tracking system = YES; Scheduling = YES; Project Portfolio Management = YES; Resource Management = YES; Document Management = YES; Workflowsystem = YES; Repoprting = YES

Monetary features: Budget Management = NO; Time Tracking = YES; Invoicing = NO

The page of factro in wikipedia is made but in discussion

Thank you very much, Klaus

More information about factro is to be found in many articles - e.g.:

Extended content

27.04.2007 Vogel Communications Group; it-business: "Mittelstandslösungen Schuchert präsentiert Projekt- und Managementsoftware" https://www.it-business.de/schuchert-praesentiert-projekt-und-managementsoftware-a-64316/ 19.06.2007 ChannelPartner: „Factro: die „MS Projekt“-Alternative“ https://www.channelpartner.de/a/factro-die-ms-project-alternative,242522 14.11.2007 Computerwoche: „Factro: Projekt-Software vom Fachmann“ https://www.computerwoche.de/a/factro-projekt-software-vom-fachmann,1848142 10.11.2008 DRUWEKO Neuigkeiten: „ Der factro Intervallmanager – mehr Sicherheit für unsere Kunden“ https://www.druweko.de/der-factro-intervallmanager-mehr-sicherheit-fur-unsere-kunde/ 11/2007(?) Adpoets.de: „factro – Sie haben’s erfasst“ https://www.adpoets.de/fileadmin/webuser_daten/blog/TextGalerie/Broschueren/PDFs/FACTRO_Fly.pdf 13.10.2011 Das Unternehmerhandbuch: „Topliste der Projektmanagement Software für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen“ https://das-unternehmerhandbuch.de/topliste-der-projektmanagement-software-fur-kleine-und-mittlere-unternehmen/ 12.10.2015 Projektmanagement24: „Projektmanagement Software – eine Übersicht“ https://projektmanagement24.de/projektmanagement-software-eine-uebersicht 27.04.2016 SB – startupbrett: „factro: Aufgaben & Projekte im Team organisieren – Online und jederzeit“ https://www.startupbrett.de/factro-aufgaben-projekte-im-team-organisieren-online-und-jederzeit/ 13.09.2017 Marketing im Pott: „Kostenlose Projektmanagement Tools“ https://www.marketingimpott.de/blog/kostenlose-projektmanagement-tools/ 13.11.2017 Computerwoche: „Die besten Projektmanagement-Tools“ https://www.computerwoche.de/a/die-besten-projektmanagement-tools,2364604,2 06.12.2017 BASIC thinking: „Mit factro die Produktivität im Team steigern“ https://www.basicthinking.de/blog/2017/12/06/factro-projektmanagement/ 15.12.2017 GUTEPROJEKTE.CH: „factro“ http://www.guteprojekte.ch/arbeitshilfen/tools/kostenlos/item/factro 15.01.2018 CHIP: „Die besten Alternativen zu Trello“ https://praxistipps.chip.de/die-besten-alternativen-zu-trello_38874 02.03.2018 Gründerküche.de: „Projektmanagement für Gründer: Wichtige Tools und Apps“ https://www.gruenderkueche.de/fachartikel/projektmanagement-fuer-gruender-wichtige-tools-und-apps/ 07/2018(?) Ordnungsmentor: „Welches Tool ist das Richitge?“ https://ordnungsmentor.de/aufgabenverwaltung-tools/ 11.09.2018 sevDESK: „ Projektmanagement-Software Vergleich – Tools für deine Projektplanung“ https://sevdesk.de/blog/projektmanagement-software/ 11.10.2018 GIGA: „factro“ https://www.giga.de/webapps/factro/ 13.11.2018 PRESSEPORTAL – Netzsieger: „Modern, übersichtlich, effizient – Die besten Projektmanagement-Tools im großen Check“ https://www.presseportal.de/pm/122186/4114496 12.12.2018 NETZSIEGER: „Projektmanagement-Software factro“ https://www.netzsieger.de/p/factro 17.01.2019 Internet für Architekten: „Projektmanagement-Software aus der Cloud“ https://internet-fuer-architekten.de/projektmanagement-software-aus-der-cloud/ 31.01.2019 Capterra: „Die Top 30 kostenlosen bzw. Open Source-Projektmanagement-Tools für kleine Unternehmen“ https://www.capterra.com.de/blog/384/top-10-kostenlose-projektmanagement-tools Feb 19 ComputerWeekly: „Datenschutz beim Projektmanagement mit externen Agenturen“ https://www.computerweekly.com/de/meinung/Datenschutz-beim-Projektmanagement-mit-externen-Agenturen 19.02.2019 Informatik Aktuell: „Digitalisiere dein kleines und mittelständisches Unternehmen mit Cloud-Software“ https://www.informatik-aktuell.de/management-und-recht/digitalisierung/digitalisiere-dein-kleines-und-mittelstaendisches-unternehmen-mit-cloud-software.html 21.02.2019 sma social media academie: „10 aktuelle Projektmanagement Tools“ https://www.socialmediaakademie.de/blog/10-aktuelle-projektmanagement-tools/ Mrz 19 STERN Online: „Die 7 besten Projektmanagement-Softwares im Vergleich“ https://www.stern.de/vergleich/projektmanagement-software/ Mrz 19 INGENIEUR.de: „Sind Projektmanagement-Tools eigentlich DSGVO-konform?“ https://www.ingenieur.de/karriere/arbeitsrecht/sind-projektmanagement-tools-noch-dsgvo-konform/ 12.03.2019 CRM-TECH.WORLD: „ Projektmanagement-Software factro im Schnell-Check“ https://www.crm-tech.world/2019/03/12/projektmanagement-software-factro-im-schnell-check/ 21.03.2019 FOCUS Online: „Projektmanagement-Tools im Vergleich: factro gegen Asana“ https://www.focus.de/digital/experten/software-projektmanagement-tools-im-vergleich-factro-gegen-asana_id_10485623.html 26.03.2019 Selbständig im Netz: „Projektmanagement-Software – die 7 besten Tools“ https://www.selbstaendig-im-netz.de/planung/projektmanagement-software-die-7-besten-tools/ 28.03.2019 openPM Projekt.Management.Praxis.: "Software" http://openpm.info/display/openPM/Software 09.04.2019 Blog content.de: „Content Marketing trifft Projektmanagement“ https://blog.content.de/2019/04/09/content-marketing-trifft-projektmanagement/ 10.04.2019 Gründer.de: „Trello-Alternative aus Deutschland – Gibt es sowas?“ https://www.gruender.de/trello-alternative-aus-deutschland-gibt-es-sowas/ 15.04.2019 Lead Digital: „Besser mal entslacken?“ https://www.lead-digital.de/besser-mal-entslacken/ 29.04.2019 HubSpot: „19 Projektmanagement-Tools für Marketing-Agenturen“ https://blog.hubspot.de/marketing/projekt-management-tools-fuer-marketing-agenturen 05/2019(?) OMT: „Projektmanagement-Tools: Die besten Anbieter im Vergleich!“ https://www.omt.de/online-marketing-tools/projektmanagement-tools/ 02.05.2019 NETZSIEGER: „Projektmanagement-Software – Die besten Projektmanagement-Tools im Vergleich“ https://www.netzsieger.de/k/projektmanagement-software 14.05.2019 GetApp: „factro Pricing, Features, Reviews & Comparison of Alternatives“ https://www.getapp.com/project-management-planning-software/a/factro/ 24.05.2019 Social Startup Magazin: „Top 5 Projektmanagement-Software – Verloren im Software-Dschungel“ https://www.social-startups.de/projektmanagement-software/ 03.06.2019 PRESSEBOX: „Projektmanagement-Software: factro baut Benachrichtigungssystem aus“ https://www.pressebox.de/inaktiv/schuchert-managementberatung-gmbh-co-kg/Projektmanagement-Software-factro-baut-Benachrichtigungssystem-aus/boxid/958803 24.06.2019 GooglePlay https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.factro.mobileapp&hl=de 03.07.2019 heise online: „Projektmanagement: factro erhält neues Benachrichtigungssystem“ https://www.heise.de/ix/meldung/Projektmanagement-factro-erhaelt-neues-Benachrichtigungssystem-4462034.html 11.07.2019 Vergleich.org: „Projektmanagement Software Vergleich 2019“ https://www.vergleich.org/projektmanagement-software/ 07/2019(?) Trusted: „PM Projektmanagement Software im Vergleich – Die 21 besten PM Projektmanagement Tools im Test“ https://trusted.de/factro 07/2019(?) Projektmanagement FREEWARE: factro Projektverwaltung https://projektmanagement-freeware.de/software/factro-projektverwaltung/ 07/2019(?) ProvenExpert: „factro“ https://www.provenexpert.com/de-de/factro/ 07/2019(?) Projektforum: „ Die Vorteile des digitalen Workbooks“ https://projektforum.de/factro/ 07/2019(?) top10projektmanagement-software: „Factro im Test“ https://www.top10projektmanagement-software.de/p/factro/ 07/2019(?) Capterra: „factro von Schuchert Managementberatung“ https://www.capterra.at/software/180053/factro 07/2019(?) suitApp: „factro“ https://suitapp.de/software/factro/ 07/2019(?) Projektmanagement mit Katharina Vollus: „Für Projektmanager, die das passende Tool suchen: Ein Überblick“ https://katharinavollus.de/welches-aufgaben-und-projektmanagement-tool-ist-das-passende/ 07/2019(?) Capterra: „factro Alternativen“ https://www.capterra.com.de/alternatives/180053/factro 07/2019(?) Owler: „Factro's Competitors, Revenue, Number of Employees, Funding and Acquisitions“ https://www.owler.com/company/factro 07/2019(?) Cammio Video recruitment experts: „Wie Sie mit einer Projektmanagement-Software die Produktivität im HR und Recruiting steigern“ https://cammio.com/tag/factro/?lang=de 07/2019(?) Cammio Video recruitment experts: „Wie Sie mit einer Projektmanagement-Software die Produktivität im HR und Recruiting steigern“ https://cammio.com/blog/die-auswahl-der-perfekten-projektmanagement-software/?lang=de 07/2019(?) Projektmanagement-Lösungen: „factro – für Tasks und Projektmanagement von Schuchert Managementberatung GmbH & Co. KG http://www.projektmanagement-loesungen.de/product/86-factro%C2%AE--f%C3%BCr-tasks-und-projektmanagement-von-schuchert-managementberatung-gmbh-&-co.-kg/ 07/2019(?) PM-Software.info: „Software-Verzeichnis für Multi-Projektmanagement und Projektportfolio-Management https://pm-software.info/produkte/ 07/2019(?) Gruenderfreunde: „5 factro Features für optimale Kollaboration“ https://gruenderfreunde.de/5-factro-features-fuer-optimale-kollaboration/ 07/2019(?) Stackfield: „Stackfield ist die umfassende und sichere Alternative zu factro“ https://www.stackfield.com/de/factro-alternative 07/2019(?) Capterra: „factro Pro Schuchert Managementberatung“ https://www.capterra.mx/software/180053/factro 07/2019(?) App-Store-Vorschau: „factro Projekte und Aufgaben managen“ https://apps.apple.com/de/app/factro/id1437520877 07/2019(?) Software Search.com: „Projektmanagement Software“ https://software-search.com/software/listing/factro/ 07/2019(?) BITMI: „factro“ https://smig.bitmi.de/product/626-factro 07/2019(?) Swipx: „factro – task and project management software https://swipx.com/apps/factro/ 07/2019(?) GetApp: „factro Alternativen“ https://www.getapp.at/alternatives/114345/factro 07/2019(?) GetApp: „factro Cloudbasierte Projektmanagement Software mit intuitiver Bedienung“ https://www.getapp.at/software/114345/factro 07/2019(?) PROSYSCO: „Projektmanagement – factro Die Projektmanagement-Software für smarte Teams“ https://www.prosysco.de/projektmanagement-pm-software-factr 07/2019(?) 10best-project-management-software: „Factro review“ https://top10best-project-management-software.com/p/factro/ 07/2019(?) SoftGuide der Softwareführer: "factro" https://www.softguide.de/programm/factro-aufgabenmanagement

Not done for now: Entries in this article must have existing, actual Wikipedia articles prior to being added to this list. I'm glad the Wikipedia article is being worked on - please feel free to reopen this request once the article is published. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:37, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear author, now factro is published in wikipedia - please see: [[1]] - could you please add factro to the list of project management software now? Thank you very much; it is Web-based = YES; not hosted on-premise = NO; Saas = YES; Proprietary; with programming language JavaScript

the features are: Collaborating software = YES; Issue tracking system = YES; Scheduling = YES; Project Portfolio Management = YES; Resource Management = YES; Document Management = YES; Workflowsystem = YES; Repoprting = YES

Monetary features: Budget Management = NO; Time Tracking = YES; Invoicing = NO

I found out, that I can add factro myself - and did it. Hope it is OK KlausUhlmann (talk) 12:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Asana listed as "No" for an Issue tracking system?

I just visited this page today and am puzzled as to why Asana is listed as a "No" in the "Issue tracking system" column. Issue tracking is exactly how I have been using Asana for the past several years, both personally and for work. Can any previous editors shine any light on this? Is there a nuance to "Issue tracking systems" that I'm missing? I would like to go in and change the "no" to "yes", as I think that would be most accurate, but I'd like to understand any background first. Thanks - Dyork (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Taiga

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add Taiga, as in the article, i.e.:

Web-based: yes
Hosted on-premises: yes
SaaS: yes
Licence: AGPL
Programming language: Python, AngularJS

MMN (talk) 15:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Minecrafter0271 (talk) 04:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 March 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

WhipWare is an ERP application designing platform, WhipProjects is a complete project management suite and helps manage and configure workflows using web based designers. https://whipware.com Amirali0204 (talk) 09:17, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This item does not meet he inclusion criteria; you will need to establish an article first. Kuru (talk) 12:24, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HP Project & Portfolio Software entry problems

1. HP Project & Portfolio Software no longer exists. HP Business Software was acquired by MicroFocus in 2017 and I believe they market a suite under the name PPM: https://www.microfocus.com/en-us/products/ppm-it-project-portfolio-management/overview The HP_Software_&_Solutions page redirects to Micro_Focus but that does not have any information about this software.

2. The entry in the General information table has a missing cell. One of the cells "Web-based", "Hosted on premises" or SaaS" is missing so that the alignment of the licence column is screwed up.

Nick the engineer (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Add ZenTao to the list

ZenTao is an open-source project management software with product management, project management, test management, document management, CI management, and todo management. It is a professional Application Lifecycle Management(ALM), covering the core process of software development.

It is also available on GitHub and with quite flexible API to extend features.

ZenTao has been selected as one of the Projects of the Week, September 24, 2018 on SourceForge, a web-based service "to control and manage free and open-source software projects"

Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can we please add a new project management software (which was released in June 2020) to the list? I've added the software as a new Wikipedia page as well. Table attributes below.

Software: TrueNxus Web-based: Yes Hosted on-premise: No SaaS: Yes License: Proprietary Jfried2020 (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, does not have an article here. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 August 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I want to add a new softare. Software: CANEA Project Web-based: Yes Hosted on-premise: Yes Saas: Yes License: Proprietary Programming language: C# .NET

Features: Collaborative softare: Yes Issue tracking system: Yes Scheduling: Yes Project portfolio management: Yes Resource management: Yes Document management: Yes Workflow system: Yes Reporting and analyses: Yes Budget management: Yes Time tracking: Yes Invoicing: No Fredrik.hjelmare (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Entries should have a Wiki-article based on independent reliable sources. Please see also WP:COI, in case it applies. GermanJoe (talk) 07:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello, I would like to add Merlin Project to the list. There is no mention about one of the biggest solutions for macOS and iOS in that listing. Thanks!

Merlin Project for macOS and iOS

Webbased "NO"
Hosted on Premise "YES"
SaaS "NO"
License "Proprietary"
Language "Objective C"

Features

All can be set to "YES".

Monetary features

Budgetmanagement "YES"
Time Tracking "NO"
Invoicing "NO"

AppleMacKing (talk) 14:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. See WP:WTAF. ◢ Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 15:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 4th of May 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I am one of the core developers of OpenProject. OpenProject is not using AngularJS anymore as a framework but the more modern Angular. Could you please update the "Programming language" column accordingly? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wielinde (talk • contribs) 10:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You can see the change here. Anton.bersh (talk) 11:36, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citation errors

Within the ref list the references "2-plan", "2-plan license", and "PMI Italy" should either be removed or commented out. They are currently causing cite errors, as they are defined in the ref list but not used in the article. Thanks 92.5.2.97 (talk) 15:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 June 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello! I feel that this page could greatly benefit by having supported operating systems for any on-premesis software. I request that one of the following options be implemented:

a) a single column be added within the "General information" table with cells reading "Linux, MacOS, Windows" or similar
b) separate columns be added within the "General information" table with color-coded cells indicating support of each respective operating system, such as Linux, MacOS, and Windows

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please provide an example of how exactly you think the table in question should be formatted, so that it can then be simply copied into the article RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:38, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALLEX

Please consider adding

Allex.ai - Leader In Project and Resource Management Software https://www.allex.ai/ Mocha c jp (talk) 02:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done spam. Theroadislong (talk) 07:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clickup not mentioned

I just noticed Clickup is not mentioned on this page. Neither is SmartSuite. It seems likely there are other large PMS companies not present here. Cbility (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was in the list until May 2017

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_project_management_software&diff=prev&oldid=781801222 142.59.212.243 (talk) 17:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accelo

Accelo is another that can be added to this list 4.30.25.142 (talk) 20:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can i add another project software. Florentinaosmani (talk) 08:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it.Sam Kuru (talk) 11:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2023

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined.

What I think should be changed:

I would like to request that Aha! (company) is added to this article. Here is the main article for Aha! http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Aha!_(company)

I am proposing the following changes:

General information: - Web-based YES - Hosted on-premises NO - SaaS YES - License PROPRIETARY

Features: - Collaborative Software YES - Issue-tracking system YES - Scheduling YES - Project Portfolio Management YES - Resource Management YES - Document Management YES - Workflow Systems YES - Reporting and analysis YES

Monetary features: - Budget management NO - Time tracking NO - Invoicing NO

Why it should be changed:

Aha! software is a tool that is used by project managers today.

References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

^[1] ^[2]

Ejag2099 (talk) 20:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list of links to articles about project management software. That's an article about a company, and a promotional sounding one at that. - MrOllie (talk) 21:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttps://www.aha.io/solutions/project

[2] ttps://www.aha.io/support/roadmaps/strategic-roadmaps/introduction/explore-project-workspace

[1]

[2]