Talk:Carlile House

Carlile House has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 30, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 December 2022 by reviewer Schwede66 (talk · contribs).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Passed. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Carlile House/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ewhite31 (talk · contribs) 11:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Alexeyevitch (talk · contribs) 11:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Christchurch! I will begin this review soon. New Zealand topics are a personal area of interest for me! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask them here. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 11:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Carlile House is a Category 1 Historic Place... who categorizes it as a Category 1 Historic Place? of course it's Heritage New Zealand so it's best to list that. In the mid to late twentieth-century metal clad shed was also added behind the building. add comma In 2002, dance performances The Carlile House Project and Strange Fruit, were awarded funding from Auckland City Council's creative communities initiative, and put on a week of performances in the building incomplete sentence & a bit difficult to understand Carlile House, formerly Costley Training Institute, was a boys' home and training centre, built in 1886 an international reader would want to know where it is, please add it's in Auckland in the suburb of Grey Lynn. It is an H-plan layout incomplete sentence
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	the New Zealand Herald... newspaper publications should be italicized & a link would be good here. Hukarere Maori Girls’ School curly apostrophe should be replaced with straight apostrophe.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Ref layout is sufficient. Passed.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I have no concerns with the reliabilty of the refs but here is a few things that are better formatted Add the author's name (Joan McKenzie) to the Heritage New Zealand ref Dmitry (2013) is a thesis, please use Template:Cite thesis Did you access Bernadette (2002) via ProQuest or is a URL available?
	2c. it contains no original research.	However, it is currently in a dilapidated state, and considered a dangerous building. There is both interior and exterior water damage, most of the windows are without glazing, there are few downpipes, the corrugated iron on the roof is deteriorating and fires in 2003 and 2013 have destroyed much of the interior. New Zealand Herald ref dosen't mention considering the buidling dangerous.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The land was bought for £1025, the buildings constructed for £2830, and furnished and landscaped for £703 Is it known when and who bought the land & when the other events happened?
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	I have no issues with the neutrality in this article. Passed.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	The page is stable & free of edit wars. Passed.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images have sutiable copyright statuses. Well done for photographing and uploading your photos to the article!
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Carlile House Side View from Richmond Rd Unsure why "Side View" needs to be capitalized and why road needs to be abbreviated.
	7. Overall assessment.	Great article! I would like to know that the user responded on my talk page and I have fixed some issues on my end (I've also scanned thru for any copyvio issues yesterday). Congrats! Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.