Talk:Avid Technology

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Professional sound production Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Cinema / Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Media High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Archives

Archive 1

Avid Logo is not the most current

The Avid logo on this page needs to be updated. I'm an Avid employee, however, I'm also ignorant in the ways of WIKIPEDIA. I attempted to update the graphic it did not take. Would love some help in getting it updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeTaylor68 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the Avid Technology logo shown on the page IS NOT the current/correct Avid Logo. I'm an Avid graphic designer and I have attempted to update the logo but have had difficulty in doing so. You know the logo is incorrect if it has a gradient in the purple. Also, the "d" should not extend above and below the "v". — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeTaylor68 (talk • contribs)

You can upload a new logo and switch to that. Binksternet (talk) 23:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Avid (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:14, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avid Technology Wikipedia Page

My name is Jessica and I’m from Avid’s PR agency. We realize we can’t update Avid’s page ourselves, so we thought we’d flag a couple of sections that are very out of date, in case someone else would like to update them: Avid Technology Wikipedia URL: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Avid_(company)

Key products section Alienbrain is now owned by Autodesk DS was discontinued in 2013 Avid Studio was discontinued ICON was discontinued NewsCutter is an option for Media Composer (Media Composer | NewsCutter Option) M-Audio is now owned by inMusic Symphony is an option for Media Composer (Media Composer | Symphony Option) Unity ISIS was discontinued Unity MediaNetwork was discontinued Discontinued products section The following discontinued products should be added: DS Avid Studio ICON Unity ISIS Unity MediaNetwork

Sources: http://avid.force.com/pkb/articles/en_US/FAQ/End-of-support-dates http://www.avid.com/products 21:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)JessicaM82 (talk)

Hi @JessicaM82:,

These changes seem reasonable, so I've made them with the exception of adding the 'NewsCutter' and 'Symphony' options. I suggest that you request these changes get made on the Media_Composer#Features page.

Sean.Bernard (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, this is Jessica again from Avid's PR agency. Since we cannot update the page ourselves, we wanted to flag Avid's 2017 fiscal data. If someone could update we'd greatly appreciate it.

For Avid’s Wiki page, fiscal 2017 data:

Revenue - $419.00 million

Operating Income - $5.25 million

Net loss - $13.56 million

Total assets - $234.68 million

Rather than total equity, IR states: “The line should read Total stockholders’ deficit. (It should have been that way for 2016 too.) The 2017 amount was $268.57 million.”

Employee count at year end 2017 - 1,591

Here is the source: http://ir.avid.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=1061070

Avid Technology and Avid Audio

Apologies if I'm missing a previous discussion on this topic. This discussion is really about 2 articles - this article (Avid Audio) and the main Avid article (Avid Technology). Avid presents their brand as a unified brand, and it seems that at this point, Avid's pro audio offerings (Pro Tools, audio interfaces, studio control surfaces) should be represented as part of the Avid Technology article. That said, I would prefer not to lose the Digidesign historical aspect (and I am not a fan of the deletion of articles about companies or brands just because they were acquired). Suggestions on how best to make the Avid Technology article more accurate / comprehensive while not losing Digidesign history? synthfiend (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem in having two articles. If you want to tell the reader more about the acquisition of Digidesign in the Avid Technology article, I would support that. Binksternet (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]