Baptist successionism

Baptist successionism as layed out by James Milton Carroll. Other sects are sometimes included in the theory.

Baptist successionism (or Baptist perpetuity) is one of several theories on the origin and continuation of Baptist churches. The theory postulates an unbroken lineage of churches (since the days of John the Baptist or the Book of Acts) which have held beliefs similar to those of current Baptists. Groups often included in this lineage include the Montanists, Paulicians, Paterines, Cathari, Waldenses, Albigenses, and Anabaptists. Although there exists variation within successionist theories.

This view is held by some conservative Baptists, however modern scholars see Baptists as originating within 17th-century puritanism, thus modern scholarship regards Baptist successionism as pseudohistorical. And the majority of modern Baptists do not believe in successionism today.

Theory

Diagram representing The Trail of Blood as presented by James Milton Carroll

The theory proposes that Baptists have an unbroken lineage from the early church, while claiming that over time bishops or pastors started to assume more authority which led to the Catholic church being born and which led to errors.

Groups often included in the succession line are Montanists, Novationists, Donatists, Paulicians, Pataria, Cathars, Waldenses, Petrobrusians, Arnoldists, Henricians, and Anabaptists. With some variantions of the including factions of Hussitism and Lollardism within the claimed succession.

Supporters of the theory argue that groups such as Bogomils, Paulicians, or Cathars were Baptist in doctrine instead of Gnostic; with, for example, Berlin Hisel arguing that many charges put towards Bogomils were false. However these claims have been often critiqued by historians such as Charles Schmidt.

Montanism

Montanism is the first and earliest group included in Baptist successionism. Montanism has been generally associated as being a charismatic group that emphasized personal revelation, which also sought to establish a more conservative personal ethic. However, Berlin Hisel, a proponent of Baptist successionism argued that Eusebius' (265 – 339) portrayal of Montanism is questionable, claiming that he had no firsthand sources on Montanism. Although conceding that some of the Montanists may have held aberrant views, he still held that Montanism was largely an early Baptist movement. Citing the Baptist historian, Henry C. Vedder (who himself was critical of successionism), Baptist successionists have argued that due to the principle of the regenerate church taught by Montanism necessitates that they would have taught believer's baptism.

Novatians

The Novatians were an early Christian sect that emerged in the third century. The Novatians were among the first groups included by James Milton Carroll in his "Trail of Blood", whom he argued to represent an ancient form of Baptist theology. Berlin Hisel, argued that the Novatians practiced believer's baptism and emphasized church discipline similarly to modern Baptist groups. However, the evidence for the Novatians being credobaptists has been called "weak" by some historians, as Augustine’s accounts and other sources do not explicitly support this view in a robust manner.

Paulicians and Bogomils

Paulicianism was a sect in the Eastern Church which was started by a preacher named Constantine. As with Montanism, Baptist successionists dispute charges made against the Paulicians and Bogomils, including claims that they rejected the writings of Peter the Apostle and the Old Testament. Hisel Berlin argued that the Paulicians upheld an orthodox view of the Trinity and contended that many of the charges against them were unreliable, as the primary sources were written by their opponents. Hisel also suggested that the Paulicians practiced believer's baptism, a belief he claimed for them to share with the Bogomils.

Hisel claimed that the charges of the Bogomils rejecting baptism likely meant a rejection of infant baptism and trine-immersion, which could have been taken as rejection of baptism itself, since the sources that exist about Bogomilism are from people who opposed them, and thus he argued that these sources should be taken with suspicion.

Arnoldists

Hisel made the case that the Arnoldists were baptist in doctrine, as evidence the Lateran council is quoted where Arnold of Brescia was condemned for rejecting infant baptism and for the rejection of transubstantiation. A direct connection with Arnoldists and Waldensians was also claimed to support succession, a direct link was also argued with Arnoldists and Petro-Brussians.

Waldensians

The Waldensians, a medieval Christian movement of the 12th century, were identified by Hisel as having connections to the Albigenses. He claimed that the two groups shared a common origin with similar doctrinal beliefs, including the rejection of paedobaptism and a focus on personal faith. This connection was presented as part of the broader argument for Baptist succession, linking the Waldensians to other medieval groups like the Cathars..

Cathars

Pope Innocent III excommunicating the Albigensians (left), massacre of the Albigensians by the crusaders (right)

See also: Comparison of Catharism and Protestantism

The Cathars or Albigenses, a medieval group generally argued to be dualistic, were often accused of rejecting marriage and other traditional sacraments within medieval sources. However, Hisel argued that the Cathars’ supposed rejection of marriage likely referred to their refusal to recognize marriage as a sacrament, rather than a denial of the institution itself. He also suggested that the Cathars rejected infant baptism and the concept of baptismal regeneration, aligning them with other groups seen as part of the Baptist succession.

Claiming the Cathars as pockets of true teaching in the middle ages has also been done by some Reformed writers, such as Jean Duvernoy and John Foxe. Magisterial Protestants and Baptists successionists who have attempted to claim Cathars as their precursors have historically denied any charges of dualism on the Cathars as simply hostile claims. The Cathar views on dualism are against Roman Catholic, Baptist and Reformed teachings. Protestant historians such as Jacques Basnage, Mosheim and Shroeck have insisted that the charges of dualism and docetism were not authentic, only hostile claims, with such arguments being criticized by Charles Schmidt.

Arguments against Catharic dualism were the following: there were possibly other neo-Manichean dualists in the Middle Ages, but they were not Cathars; that it was a misinterpration of their theology because they denied religious hierarchy set by man or that the accusation of their dualism was merely a hostile false claim. However each argument has been called "unconvincing" by critics.

Lollards

Although Lollardy was not included in the Trail of Blood, Charles Spurgeon (an advocate of successionism) claimed that John Wycliffe and some of the Lollard movement was opposed to the practice infant baptism.

Anabaptists

A 1685 illustration by Jan Luyken, published in Martyrs Mirror, of Dirk Willems saving his pursuer, an act of mercy that led to his recapture, after which he was burned at the stake near Asperen in the present-day Netherlands

In the Trail of Blood, James Milton Carroll argued that Baptists descent from the Anabaptist movement of the 16th century. In the Baptist History Notebook, Hisel drew on historical accounts, including those of the Lutheran historian Johann Lorenz von Mosheim (1693 – 1755), to argue for a succession of Baptist-like groups throughout history. Mosheim wrote: “The true origin of that sect which acquired the denomination of Anabaptists by their administering anew the rite of baptism to those who came over to their communion, and derived that of Mennonites from the famous man to whom they owe the greatest part of their present felicity, is hidden in the depths of antiquity, and is, of consequence, extremely difficult to be ascertained.” Hisel interpreted this statement as giving credit to the idea that the Anabaptists were connected to earlier similar groups, such as the Waldensians, forming a continuous tradition of believer’s baptism and opposition to paedobaptism.

Spread of the Anabaptists 1525-1550

The view that the Baptist movement is an outgrowth of the Anabaptist movement is a central claim of the Baptist successionist advocates only held by some conservative Baptists. However, some other historians who do not believe in Baptist successionism, although holding a minority view, believe that early 17th century Baptists were influenced by (but not directly connected to) continental Anabaptists. According to this view, the General Baptists shared similarities with Dutch Waterlander Mennonites (one of many Anabaptist groups) including believer's baptism only, religious liberty, separation of church and state, and Arminian views of salvation, predestination and original sin. It is certain that the early Baptist church led by Smyth had contacts with the Anabaptists; however it is debated if these influences found their way into the English General Baptists.

Representatives of this theory include A.C. Underwood and William R. Estep. Gourley writes that among some contemporary Baptist scholars who emphasize the faith of the community over soul liberty, the Anabaptist influence theory is making a comeback. This view was also taught by the Reformed historian Philip Schaff. However, the relations between Baptists and Anabaptists were early strained. In 1624, the five existing Baptist churches of London issued a condemnation of the Anabaptists. Furthermore, the original group associated with Smyth (popularly believed to be the first Baptists) broke with the Waterlander Mennonite Anabaptists after a brief period of association in the Netherlands.

C. H. Spurgeon argued that there existed an Anabaptist community in England during the 16th century, which was the origin of the English Baptist movement.

History

C. H. Spurgeon (1834 – 1892) believed that medieval groups such as the Waldenses, Albigenses, Lollards and Anabaptists represented a primitive form of the Baptist movement.

Baptist successionsim was advocated as early as 1652 by an English Baptist named John Spittlehouse in a book entitled A Vindication of the Continued Succession of the Primitive Church of Jesus Christ (Now Scandalously Termed Anabaptists) from the Apostles Unto This Present Time. Among other early Baptists to defend successionism was the famous English preacher C. H. Spurgeon (1834 – 1892). However, the perpetuity view is most often identified with The Trail of Blood, a pamphlet by James Milton Carroll published in 1931. Other Baptist writers who held the perpetuity view are John T. Christian, Thomas Crosby, G. H. Orchard, J. M. Cramp, William Cathcart, Adam Taylor and D. B. Ray.

This view was once commonly held among Baptists. Since the end of the 19th century, however, the theory has increasingly come under attack and today has been largely discredited. Nonetheless, the view continued to be the prevailing view among Baptists of the Southern United States into the latter 20th century. It is now identified primarily with Landmarkism, which is upheld by the Independent Fundamental Baptist movement, though not exclusively so. The concept attempts to parallel the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Anglican doctrine of apostolic succession and stands in contrast to the restorationist views of Latter Day Saints and the Stone-Campbell Restoration Movement.

Even within the Independent Baptists, some individuals such as Jack Hyles (1926 – 2001) did not teach Landmarkism/Baptist successionism, although he did teach that the church started in AD 31 when Christ was still alive (and not at Pentecost), and that the Catholic Church was started by the Emperor Constantine in AD 313.

Contemporary view

Since the end of the 19th century the trend in academic Baptist historiography has been away from the successionist viewpoint to the view that modern day Baptists are an outgrowth of 17th-century English Separatism. This shift precipitated a controversy among Southern Baptists which occasioned the forced resignation of William H. Whitsitt, a professor at Southern Baptist Seminary, in 1898 from the seminary for advocating the new view, though his views continued to be taught in the seminary after his departure.

Critique

Fr. Dwight Longenecker writing for Catholic Answers has argued that Baptist successionism is unprovable, being primarily based on theological assertion rather than historical evidence. He states that its advocates too often ignore the heretical views espoused by the groups included in the succession, using only persecution by medieval Catholicism as a polemic.

Baptist successionism has also been critiqued by some Baptists, one example being Fred Anderson (an executive director at the Virginia Baptist Historical Society), who saw Baptist successionism as "fanciful history without factual basis". Today, the majority of Baptists reject the successionism of churches as in the Trail of Blood.

See also

• Anabaptism § Medieval forerunners
• Landmarkism
• Restorationism
• Christadelphians § Other historical groups and individuals with some shared doctrines
• Gospel Hall Assemblies § History
• The Pilgrim Church by Edmund Hamer Broadbent
• Proto-Protestantism

References

Works cited

• Brackney, William H. (2004). A Genetic History of Baptist Thought: With Special Reference to Baptists in Britain and North America. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0-86554-913-5.
• Cross, I. K. (1990). The Battle For Baptist History. Columbus, Georgia: Brentwood Christian Press. ISBN 978-0-89211-337-8.
• McBeth, H. Leon (1987). The Baptist Heritage: Four Centuries of Baptist Witness. Nashville, Tennessee: Broadman Press. ISBN 978-0-8054-6569-3.
• McGoldrick, James Edward (2000). Baptist Successionism: A Crucial Question in Baptist History. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-3681-5.
• Patterson, W. Morgan (1969). Baptist Successionism: A Critical View. Valley Forge, Pennsylvania: Judson Press. ISBN 978-0-8170-0420-0.
• Torbet, Robert G. (1975). A History of the Baptists (3rd ed.). Valley Forge, Pennsylvania: Judson Press. ISBN 978-0-8170-0074-5.