Jump to content

Poisoning the well: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

10 November 2024

27 April 2024

7 February 2024

28 October 2023

27 October 2023

9 July 2023

27 January 2023

27 November 2022

27 September 2022

23 June 2022

21 June 2022

10 December 2021

6 July 2021

5 July 2021

2 July 2021

30 June 2021

23 March 2021

14 February 2021

29 December 2020

14 December 2020

18 September 2020

1 September 2020

22 May 2020

18 April 2020

13 April 2020

26 February 2020

28 December 2019

6 December 2019

16 November 2019

9 September 2019

2 August 2019

  • curprev 19:0119:01, 2 August 2019 66.69.225.113 talk 3,100 bytes −8 There is no such thing as an informal logical fallacy. Informal fallacies can still be deductively valid, ergo logical. Something that is an informal logical fallacy would imply being simultaneously logical and illogical. This breaks the law of noncontradiction. In the case of informal fallacy, circular reasoning: For example 1+1 = 2 2 Therefore 2 = 1 + 1 This argument is circular but still valid; furthermore, it is sound undo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20 July 2019

23 June 2019

10 April 2019

  • curprev 14:5414:54, 10 April 2019 Mfwitten talk contribs 3,098 bytes −523 What a terrible example. Maybe it is entirely relevant that this guy screwed up the "Catalina Wine Mixer". Come up with a better example; frankly, this article doesn't need one, as the "Structure" section is good enough. undo

16 March 2019

7 March 2019

24 January 2019

22 November 2018

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)