Jump to content

Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DRACO
Representation of the rocket
FunctionSpacecraft
ManufacturerLockheed Martin
Country of originUnited States
Project cost$499 million (Phases 2 and 3)[1]
Launch history
StatusIn development
First flight2027 (planned) on a Vulcan Centaur
Payloads
Payload to low Earth orbit
Payload to Moon
Payload to Venus
Payload to Mars
Stages information
First stage
Second stage
[edit on Wikidata]

The Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) is an under-development spacecraft by Lockheed Martin in partnership with BWX Technologies as part of a DARPA program to be demonstrated in space in 2027.[2][3] The experimental vehicle is planned to be reusable and will utilize next-generation nuclear thermal propulsion technology and low-enriched uranium,[2][3][4] with the U.S. Space Force to provide the launch.[5] In 2023, NASA joined the DARPA program in developing the nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) to carry astronaut crews to deep-space destinations like Mars.[6] DRACO will be the world's first in-orbit demonstration of a NTR engine.[7] It will reportedly be launched aboard a Vulcan Centaur as a payload.[8]

Tabitha Dodson, DARPA program manager for DRACO says, "Unlike today's chemical systems, which have reached a limit in how far they can evolve, nuclear technologies are theorized to evolve to systems such as fusion and beyond. Spacecraft evolved to be maneuvered and powered by nuclear reactors will enable humanity to go farther, with a higher chance of survival and success for any mission type."[9]

According to Lockheed Martin and BWXT, there are considerable efficiency and time gains from the nuclear thermal propulsion.[10][11] NASA believes the much higher efficiency will be two to three times more than chemical propulsion,[5] and the nuclear thermal rocket is to cut the journey time to Mars in half.[12]

Background

[edit]

In May 1946, the U.S. Air Force launched the Nuclear Energy for Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project to explore the potential of nuclear energy for powering aircraft.[13][14] This initiative led to a collaborative effort of the Air Force and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) known as the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program, aimed at developing nuclear propulsion systems for aerospace vehicles.[13][14] The ANP Program was canceled in March 1961 after investing $1 billion.[13][14]

Using nuclear energy for space travel reportedly has also been discussed since the 1950s among industry experts. Freeman Dyson and Ted Taylor, through their involvement in Project Orion, aimed to create an early demonstration of the technology. Ultimately, the project received backing from Wernher von Braun, and reached the test flight stage of development, but the project ended early due to environmental concerns.[15]

In 1955, the Air Force partnered with AEC to develop reactors for nuclear rockets under Project Rover.[16] In mid-1958, NASA replaced the Air Force[16] and built Kiwi reactors to test nuclear rocket principles in a non-flying nuclear engine.[17] With the next phase's Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application (NERVA), NASA and AEC sought to develop a nuclear thermal rocket for "both long-range missions to Mars and as a possible upper-stage for the Apollo Program."[17] Due to funding issues, NERVA ended in 1973 without a flight test.[17]

New program

[edit]

In 2020, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, at the request of NASA, convened an ad hoc Space Nuclear Propulsion Technologies Committee to identify primary technical and programmatic challenges and risks for the development of space nuclear propulsion technologies for use in future exploration of the solar system. With regard to nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) systems, the committee identified the following technological challenges:[18]

  • A high operating power density and temperature of the reactor are necessary to heat the propellant to approximately 2700 K at the reactor exit for the duration of each burn.
  • The need for long-term storage and management of cryogenic, liquid hydrogen (LH2) propellant.
  • Short reactor startup times (as little as 60 s from zero to full power) relative to other space or terrestrial power reactors.
  • Dealing with the long startup and shutdown transients of an NTP system relative to chemical engines. This drives design of the engine turbopumps and thermal management of the reactor subsystem.

The committee also emphasized the lack of adequate ground-based test facilities, noting that "There are currently no facilities in the United States that could conduct a full-power ground test of a full-scale NTP reactor comparable to the Rover/NERVA experiments."[18] Nevertheless, the committee's report concluded "An aggressive program could develop an NTP system capable of executing the baseline mission [a crewed mission to Mars during opposition] in 2039."[18]

In April 2021, DARPA announced the start of DRACO by awarding 18-month Phase 1 contracts to General Atomics for the nuclear reactor concept design ($22 million), and to Blue Origin ($2.5 million) and Lockheed Martin ($2.9 million) for their competing operation system and demonstration system concept designs.[19][20]

In January 2023, NASA and DARPA announced their collaboration on DRACO, dividing the $499 million program between them for Phases 2 and 3.[6][21] NASA is to be responsible for the propulsion system and nuclear reactor, and DARPA is to lead the vehicle and integration requirements, mission concept of operations, nuclear regulatory approvals and launch authority.[6] The U.S. Space Force plans to launch DRACO on either a SpaceX Falcon 9 or a United Launch Alliance Vulcan Centaur.[citation needed]

On July 26, 2023, DARPA and NASA announced the awarding of a contract to Lockheed Martin and BWX Advanced Technologies (BWXT) for DRACO Phases 2 and 3 to design, build and demonstrate the experimental NTR for the 2027 launch.[21][22] BWXT is slated to design and build the reactor, manufacture the fuel and deliver the complete subsystem for integration into the DRACO vehicle.[23]

Design

[edit]

The main design features of DRACO include the following:[24][25]

  • The nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) engine will consist of a fission reactor that transfers heat to a liquid propellant, in this case, liquid hydrogen. That heat will convert the hydrogen into a gas that expands through a nozzle to provide thrust.
  • The nuclear fuel will consist of enriched uranium, that is, 238U (the most commonly-occurring isotope) together with roughly 20% of 235U, the fissile isotope. This level of enrichment is somewhat higher than the 3-5% common in light water power reactors on the earth,[26] but lower than the roughly 90% enrichment characteristic of weapons-grade material. The choice of 20% enrichment was made in order to alleviate programmatic and regulatory overhead.[citation needed]

According to a 2019 presidential memorandum,[27] approval for the launch of a spacecraft using uranium having enrichment below 20% (a so-called “Tier 2” vehicle) is required only by the head of the sponsoring agency (in this case, the Secretary of Defense) rather than the White House.[28]

  • The propellant will consist of liquid hydrogen (LH2) stored in a cryogenic tank. The hydrogen will be heated by the reactor in less than a second from a temperature of about 20K (-420F) to around 2,700 K. For comparison, typical water temperatures of a modern pressurized water reactor are around 600 K.[citation needed]
  • The reactor will be integrated with an expander cycle rocket engine. In this design, a turbopump directs high-pressure liquid hydrogen down two paths. The first cools the engine’s nozzle and pressure vessel. Liquid hydrogen in the second path first cools the core support assemblies, then drives the turbopump assembly, the exhaust from which is routed back to the reactor pressure vessel where it absorbs energy from the fission reaction. The superheated gas is then expanded out through the nozzle to provide thrust.[citation needed]
  • While details of the design thrust level have not been released, the design goal is said[24] to be a specific impulse in excess of 800 seconds. (This is the length of time that the rocket can accelerate its own initial mass at a constant 1 gravity.[29]) This would represent an increase of about 400 seconds compared with the specific impulse of the RL10, a liquid-fuel cryogenic rocket engine built in the United States by Aerojet Rocketdyne and which is used for Centaur upper stage of the Atlas V.[citation needed]
  • Currently it is uncertain how difficult it might be to maintain the hydrogen propellant in a liquid state for long periods of time, as would be required for trips to Mars.[30] In-space liquid cryogenic propellant transfer has not yet been demonstrated, but Lockheed Martin is developing a refueling vehicle to support Blue Origin’s Blue Moon lunar lander, and discussions are said to be ongoing about the possibility of installing a refueling port on DRACO.[24]

Development and testing

[edit]

Phase 2 of the DRACO program will involve a test of the NTR engine without nuclear fuel, while Phase 3 will include assembly of the fueled NTR with the stage, environmental testing, and space launch to conduct experiments on the NTR and its reactor.[31] The U.S. Department of Energy will provide HALEU metal to BWX Technologies for processing into low-enriched fuel.[32] The amount of HALEU utilized for the vehicle has sparked some safety concerns among industry experts and the science community.[33]

In Phase 2, the engine will be evaluated in a cold-flow test with a nonnuclear engine mock-up to assess the mechanical integrity of the core. Such tests were conducted during the Rover/NERVA program in order to study ways to prevent the core from being destroyed from the pressure and high mass flow rates due to the engine’s turbomachinery.[34]

Phase 3 will address launch and space environments testing, assembly integration and testing of the host platform, loads testing, and learning how to interface and command the engine before it is sent to space. During the Phase 3 demonstration, the spacecraft will be launched into a high orbit around Earth, between 435 and 1,240 miles (700 to 2,000 kilometers) above the surface.[24] Once in space, DRACO's reactor is not planned to be activated until it is established in a safe orbit. The minimum orbital altitude is determined by the estimated time it would take for the fission products to decay to the radioactivity level present at launch. In the case of the DRACO reactor, that is about 300 years, which requires an orbit above about 700 km if the orbital decay time is to exceed that value.[24]

According to a timeline in NASA's FY 2025 Budget Estimate document presented to Congress, the project aims to begin the implementation phase in September 2024.[35][needs update]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "DARPA and NASA pick Lockheed Martin to demonstrate DRACO nuclear rocket" Geekwire, July 23, 2023.
  2. ^ a b Mike Wall (26 July 2023). "NASA, DARPA to launch nuclear rocket to orbit by early 2026". Space.com. Retrieved 13 April 2024.
  3. ^ a b "Lockheed Martin Selected to Develop Nuclear-Powered Spacecraft". Media - Lockheed Martin. Retrieved 13 April 2024.
  4. ^ "NASA has sights set on Mars with help from a nuclear rocket engine". NBC News. 22 May 2023. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  5. ^ a b Foust, Jeff (26 July 2023). "NASA and DARPA select Lockheed Martin to develop DRACO nuclear propulsion demo". SpaceNews. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  6. ^ a b c "NASA, DARPA Will Test Nuclear Engine for Future Mars Missions". 24 January 2023. Retrieved 22 May 2024.
  7. ^ "BWXT to begin work on cislunar nuclear rocket engine and fuel". World Nuclear News. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  8. ^ Erwin, Sandra (31 October 2023). "Space Force assigns 21 national security missions to ULA and SpaceX". SpaceNews. Retrieved 22 May 2024.
  9. ^ "NASA, DARPA Partner with Industry on Mars Rocket Engine". NASA. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 13 April 2024.
  10. ^ "(Nu)clear the Way: The Future of Nuclear Propulsion is Here". Lockheed Martin. Retrieved 13 April 2024.
  11. ^ Machi, Vivienne (20 November 2024). "Space Ops: Powering National Security Space With Nuclear". Aviation Week. Retrieved 22 November 2024.
  12. ^ Chang, Kenneth (26 July 2023). "NASA Seeks a Nuclear-Powered Rocket to Get to Mars in Half the Time". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  13. ^ a b c Waid, Jack (21 June 2021). "History in Two: Manned Nuclear Aircraft Program". Air Force Materiel Command. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  14. ^ a b c McMillan, Tim (4 October 2023). "Air Force research lab takes giant leap into the new space age with plans for nuclear-powered spacecraft systems". thedebrief.org. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  15. ^ "Nuclear Pulse Propulsion: Gateway to the Stars". ans.org. Retrieved 13 April 2024.
  16. ^ a b Butz Jr., J. S. (1 June 1961). "Rover—the Nuclear Way to Space". airandspaceforces.com. Retrieved 14 May 2024.
  17. ^ a b c "Nuclear Rockets". NASA. Retrieved 14 May 2024.
  18. ^ a b c National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021). Space Nuclear Propulsion for Human Mars Exploration (Report). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25977. ISBN 978-0-309-68480-4.{{cite report}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ^ Erwin, Sandra (12 April 2021). "DARPA selects Blue Origin, Lockheed Martin to develop spacecraft for nuclear propulsion demo". SpaceNews. Retrieved 2 June 2024.
  20. ^ "DARPA Selects Performers for Phase 1 of Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO) Program". darpa.mil. 12 April 2021. Retrieved 3 June 2024.
  21. ^ a b Hitchens, Theresa (26 July 2023). "DARPA, NASA tap Lockheed Martin to design, build DRACO nuclear rocket for deep space missions". Breaking Defense. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
  22. ^ Davenport, Christian (27 July 2023). "NASA, Pentagon award contract to build nuclear-powered rocket engine". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
  23. ^ "BWXT to Provide Nuclear Reactor Engine and Fuel for DARPA Space Project". BWXT.com. BWX Technologies, Inc. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 10 June 2024.
  24. ^ a b c d e Norris, Guy (14 August 2023), "Going Nuclear", Aviation Week and Space Technology
  25. ^ Krywko, Jacek (22 July 2024). "We're building nuclear spaceships again—this time for real". Ars Technica. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
  26. ^ Connolly, Thomas J. (1978). Foundations of Nuclear Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 288. ISBN 9780471168584.
  27. ^ "Launch of Spacecraft Containing Space Nuclear Systems" (Document). National Security Presidential Memorandum-20. 20 August 2019.
  28. ^ Mccallum, Peter (6–9 April 2020). Improvements to the Nuclear Launch Approval Process and Opportunities for New Missions (PDF). Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2020: Track 3: Mission Concepts and Policy for Nuclear Space Systems. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
  29. ^ Goodger, E. M. (1970). Principles of Spaceflight Propulsion. Elsevier. ISBN 9781483158600.
  30. ^ Celnikier, L. M. (1993). Basics of Space Flight. Gif-sur-Yvette, France: Editions Frontieres. ISBN 9782863321317.
  31. ^ "Demonstration Rocket for Agile Cislunar Operations (DRACO)". darpa.mil. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  32. ^ "DARPA Kicks Off Design, Fabrication for DRACO Experimental NTR Vehicle". darpa.mil. 26 July 2023. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  33. ^ Krywko, Jacek (10 June 2024). "DARPA's planned nuclear rocket would use enough fuel to build a bomb". Ars Technica. Retrieved 16 June 2024.
  34. ^ "Leading DRACO to launch: An interview with DARPA's Tabitha Dodson". ans.org/news/. 28 July 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2024.
  35. ^ "FY 2025 Budget Estimates" (PDF).
[edit]

Public Domain This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the United States Government.

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Demonstration_Rocket_for_Agile_Cislunar_Operations&oldid=1259360945"