Anti-consumerism

Anti-consumerism is the rejection of consumerism. It is similar but not identical to anti-corporate activism. Consumerism is a term used to describe the effects of the market economy on the individual. "Consumer" has come to be a derogatory term within selling companies and debt-management consultants. It implies the mindless purchasing and disposing of any product delivered through the market. Concern over the treatment of consumers has spawned much activism, as well as the incorporation of consumer education into school curricula. Anti-consumerist activism often has parallels with environmental activism and anti-globalization, and sometimes animal-rights activism, in their condemnation of the practices of modern organizations such as the McDonald's Corporation (see McLibel). There is also significant overlap between anti-consumerism and anti-globalization.

In recent years, there have been an increasing number of books (Naomi Klein's 2000 No Logo being the best example) and films (The Corporation, Surplus) which have (to a certain extent) 'sold' an anti-corporate ideology to the public.

Opposition to economic materialism primarily comes from two sources: religion and social activism. Religions oppose materialism, some stating that it interferes with connection with the divine, or that it leads to an immoral lifestyle. Some social activists have linked forms of materialism with wars, crimes, and general social malaise. Basically, the concern is that materialism is unable to offer a proper raison d´etre for human existence.

Background

Anti-consumerism is often associated with criticisms of consumption starting with Karl Marx and Thorstein Veblen, but according to Veblen's 'Theory of the Leisure Class' consumerism can be traced back to the first human civilizations.^{[citation needed]} Consumerism can also mean economic policies associated with Keynesian economics, and, in an abstract sense, refer to the belief that the free choice of consumers should dictate the economic structure of a society (cf. producerism, especially in the British sense of the term). Comedian Bill Hicks and writer Pier Paolo Pasolini were strongly opposed to consumerism.

Politics and society

Anti-corporate activists believe that the rise of large business corporations is posing a threat to the legitimate authority of nation states and the public sphere. It is felt that these corporations, are invading people's privacy, manipulating politics and governments, and creating false needs in consumers. The sort of evidence that supports this belief includes invasive advertising (adware, spam, telemarketing, etc.), massive corporate campaign contributions in democratic elections, interference in the policies of sovereign nation states (see, for example, Ken Saro-Wiwa), and endless global news stories about corporate corruption (Martha Stewart and Enron, for example). Anti-consumerism protesters would point out that corporations' responsibility is to answer only to shareholders, giving human rights and other issues almost no consideration. In practice, the management of a limited company do have primary responsibility to their shareholders, since any philanthropic activities that do not directly serve the business could be deemed to be a breach of trust. This sort of financial responsibility means that multi-national corporations will usually pursue strategies which intensify labour and attempt to reduce costs. For example, they will (either directly, or through subcontractors) attempt to find low wage economies with laws which are conveniently lenient on human rights, the environment, trade union organization and so on (see, for example, Nike, Inc.).

Conspicious consumption

Marx argued that the capitalist economy leads to the fetishization of goods and services, and the devaluing of the worth of a good or service, and instead focusing on its price in the market. In many critical contexts the term is used to describe the tendency of people to identify strongly with products or services they consume, especially those with commercial brand names and obvious status-enhancing appeal, e.g. an expensive automobile, rich jewellery. It is a pejorative term which most people deny, having some more specific excuse or rationalization for consumption other than the idea that they're "compelled to consume". A culture that has a high amount of consumerism is referred to as a consumer culture.

To those who accept the idea of consumerism, these products are not seen as valuable in themselves, but rather as social signals that allow them to identify like-minded people through consumption and display of similar products. Few would yet go so far, though, as to admit that their relationships with a product or brand name could be substitutes for the healthy human relationships lacking in dysfunctional modern societies.

The older term "conspicuous consumption" spread to describe this in the United States in the 1960s, but was soon linked to larger debates about media theory, culture jamming, and its corollary productivism.

The term and concept of "conspicuous consumption" originated at the turn of the 20th century in the writing of economist Thorstein Veblen. The term describes an apparently irrational and confounding form of economic behaviour. Veblen's scathing proposal that this unnecessary consumption is a form of status display is made in darkly humorous observations like the following:

"It is true of dress in even a higher degree than of most other items of consumption, that people will undergo a very considerable degree of privation in the comforts or the necessaries of life in order to afford what is considered a decent amount of wasteful consumption; so that it is by no means an uncommon occurrence, in an inclement climate, for people to go ill clad in order to appear well dressed."(The Theory of the Leisure Class, 1899).

Viktor Frankl had suggested that in the U.S., the engine behind consumerism is an extension of the "bread-winner" desire, an argument originally made by Veblen in his 1899 book, and more recently in the book The Rebel Sell.

"Overcoming Consumerism" is a growing philosophy. It is a term that embodies the active resistance to consumerism. It is being used by many universities as a term for course material and as an introduction to the study of marketing from a non-traditional approach.

An extreme view is that over-consumption threatens emotional destabilization of the global population, and that behavioral health professionals need to document and analyze the large group etiology that develops a subculture of pathological self-medication. This is seen to have impacts far beyond the immediate consumer group. While resources to confront the crisis must be developed within geographic areas inhabited by the affected population, interest and motivation is often prompted and facilitated by efforts from outside the areas most affected. Such methods as boycotts or moral purchasing, for instance, often exclude dealings with a population pathologically consuming an ecosystem or species - these are often successful at ending such consumption, e.g. European Union boycotts of Canadian seal fur from the Newfoundland seal hunt.

The concept flows from the theory of commodity fetishism — that people experience social relationships as value relations between things, e.g. between the cash in their wage packet and the shirt they want. The cash and the shirt appear to conduct social relations independently of the humans involved, determining who gets what by their in-built values. This leaves the person who earned the cash and the people who made the shirt ignorant of and alienated from their social relationship with each other.

Criticism

While there is not precisely an intellectual movement to promote consumerism, there has been, in recent years, strong criticism of the anti-consumerist movement. Most of this comes from libertarian thought. For example, Reason magazine, in 1999, attacked the anti-consumerism movement, claiming Marxist academics are repackaging themselves as anti-consumerists. James Twitchell, a professor at the University of Florida and popular writer, referred to anti-consumerism arguments as "Marxism Lite."

The defenders of corporations would argue that governments do legislate in ways that restrict the actions of corporations (see Sarbanes-Oxley Act) and that lawbreaking companies and executives are routinely caught and punished. In addition from the perspective of business ethics it might be argued that chief executives are not inherently more evil than anyone else and so are no more likely to attempt unethical or illegal activity than the general population. Nonetheless, the structures of bureaucracy and the financial imperatives of capitalism seem to result in forms of behaviour which are often damaging for local communities, employees and the environment.

The libertarian attack on the anti-consumerist movement is largely based on the perception that it leads to elitism. Namely, libertarians believe that no person has the right to decide for (or even suggest to) others what goods are "necessary" for living and which aren't, or that luxuries are necessarily profligate, and thus argue that anti-consumerism is a precursor to central planning or a totalitarian society. On the other hand, many see anti-consumerism as a personal lifestyle choice rather than a political belief, and it isn't necessarily incompatible with libertarian ideals.

There are many non-profit publications available to assist in consumer education such as Consumer Reports or Choice Magazine.

External links

Wikisource complete text of The Society of the Spectacle
Raoul Vaneigem's "The Revolution of Everyday Life"
Fifty Possible Ways to Challenge Over-Commercialism by Albert J. Fritsch, SJ, PhD
Ralph Nader, a lawyer with a long record of fighting big corporations and winning.
Multinational Monitor, a magazine that reports on corporate crime and unethical practices.

References

Bakan, J (2004) The Corporation.
Hertz, N (2002) Silent Takeover: Global Capitalism and the Death of Democracy. Arrow.
Klein, Naomi (2000). No Logo. Vintage Canada. ISBN 0-6769-7282-9.
Monbiot, G (2001) Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain. Pan.