Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 June 5

< June 4	June 6 >

June 5

Image:Iris kyle.jpg

Image:Iris kyle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Walliser (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PD-self conflicts with the source's homepage, which says "copyright 2006." no evidence that uploader is photographer. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept per decision by User:WilyD in previous discussion started May 16. -Nv8200p talk 00:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Portal screenshot.jpg

Image:Portal screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gazimoff (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per clear concensus from this debate last month.
Keep and speedy close, this was just done last month. -- Sabre (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - *sigh*, I thought we were done with this already. Speedy close too, too soon after recent consensus. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 19:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. (Copied from previous discussion which was not closed nor had a clear concensus) Why is this screenshot used when Image:Portalgame.jpg can serve the same purpose? Either one or the other should be deleted. Jappalang (talk) 00:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The two images are used on two different articles. NFCC don't require the same image to be used on each article.
- Question Why is this on the June 5 log? Someone should close the May 16 debate which is linked from the image description. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 00:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Refer to NFCC#3a: "Minimal usage. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." The criteria applies to the entire project not just one article (otherwise why would NFCC#7 specify usage to "at least one article") The two images are of the same non-free content and hence violate NFCC#3a. Jappalang (talk) 02:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If it comes down to choosing between this one and Image:Portalgame.jpg, I'd probably recommend this one. Although in the past I've seen complaints about adding further non-free use rationales to the same image so that it can be used in multiple articles, hence why the image was taken. As mentioned before, its use was accepted during the parent article's FAC.Gazimoff ^Write _Read 07:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Following through Proposed change to wording of criterion 3a, the current wording achieved through concensus was to exclude the possibility of two non-free images showing the same content. The image nominated for IFD might have been accepted in the FAC (no one talked about the images existing in the article), but it was likely because they overlooked the similar image in the Portal article and NFCC#3a. That said, perhaps a concensus between editors of The Orange Box and Portal (video game) should be reached on which image to use and to let the discarded image be orphaned and deleted. Jappalang (talk) 08:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Image was not fair use in the one article it was being used in. -Nv8200p talk 00:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Speed Racer.jpg

Image:Speed Racer.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Diceman (notify | contribs).

Auto listing incomplete IfD, image is not orphaned. BJBot (talk) 00:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly no free alternative to identify this lead character --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 00:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While there are no free alternatives, the project has Image:Speed Racer promotional image.jpg to identify the character with (notwithstanding Image:Mach GoGoGo manga covers.jpg and Image:Speed and Racer X.jpg. Jappalang (talk) 02:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Staro.gif

Image:Staro.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khilkoff (notify | contribs).

While it may or not be orphaned, an image of the lineage (something that can never be edited) is UE and unnecessary. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hexstar.gif

Image:Hexstar.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Doomy1216 (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic image not used in any article. Deadly∀ssassin 01:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with extreme prejudice. This kid has been running roughshod on this site with his nonsense for far too long. I've reported him to AIV in the hopes that his plug gets pulled. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:51, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Associated AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle Zone Wrestling resulted in speedy deletion. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 01:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Meedyshields.jpg

Image:Meedyshields.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Add925 (notify | contribs).

Not pixel identical but basically the same as Image:Meedyshields.gif. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or move to Commons. Higher resolution than the GIF. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 01:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decently the same as Image:Hayabusa hover.jpg. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Same image as Image:Hayabusa hover.jpg except it is of smaller size and lacking a non-essential background object. Being free images, "Hayabusa hover" is a superior image in size. Jappalang (talk) 00:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eatonshotel.jpg

Image:Eatonshotel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cymruman (notify | contribs).

Orphaned UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jsantana.jpg

Image:Jsantana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reezy (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic orphaned image, replaced an obvious copyvio image. Uploader meant as an insult, I think. Mosmof (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fuckyou.jpg

Image:Fuckyou.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reezy (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic, violates WP:CIVIL Mosmof (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Governor.jpg

Image:Governor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prithvin 88 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:34, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JFKmotorcade.jpg

Image:JFKmotorcade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AmericanCentury21 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Obsolete by Image:John F. Kennedy motorcade, Dallas crop.png ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 05:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am much for replacing fair use with free images but this...this replacement is just really, really, really bad. I'll excuse the angle and the bar in the lower left hand corner, but there's dust and it looks out of focus. No opinion on whether it should be deleted or not. hbdragon88 (talk) 17:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There's no question that its quality isn't great, I was a bit worried about it, but it does the job. If you think that it's irreplaceable, there's a convo about it at Wikipedia_talk:NFC#Image:JFKmotorcade.jpg. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 09:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - As much as I want to...I can't disagree with DCG's assessment. This free image does show all parties...I just think that the image quality of the nonfree one is just vastly superior. hbdragon88 (talk) 20:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reason to keep since it is replaced by a free alternative. Garion96 (talk) 09:32, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Picture of little ol me.jpg

Image:Picture of little ol me.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dipolemoment (notify | contribs).

Userpage image of indef blocked sockpuppet, UE, OR, probable CV ~~ N (t/c) 07:58, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Madlax-shooting.jpg

Image:Madlax-shooting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by OgasawaraSachiko (notify | contribs).

Fair use rationale invalid - cannot possibly be the "main visual identification" of Madlax in the article. Malkinann (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are four other non-free images that clearly show Madlax (Image:Main characters of Madlax.jpg, Image:Madlax.jpg, Image:Madlax (character).jpg, Image:Madlaxwhitedress.jpg). Another one is needless. Jappalang (talk) 00:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Invasion_of_the_saucer_men.jpg

Image:Invasion_of_the_saucer_men.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dipolemoment (notify | contribs).

upload of a indef blocked sockpuppet, UE, CV ccwaters (talk) 14:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: } keep per WP:AGF. -Nv8200p talk 00:58, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Franky_Gee_&_Maloy.JPG

Image:Franky_Gee_&_Maloy.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Malulay (notify | contribs).

Copyright violation: http://maloystudio.com/CJ.html — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 15:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I already edited the source. http://www.maloystudio.com/CJ.html is my old personal homepage & I, myself, uploaded the photo to that webpage. So, I am still the copyright owner of the photo. Malulay (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:CAPTJackpsorig75.JPG

Image:CAPTJackpsorig75.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Malulay (notify | contribs).

Copyright violation: http://maloystudio.com/CJ.html — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 15:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This one can be deleted 'coz I forgot to change the destination file name. So I uploaded it again. Malulay (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedied under I1. hbdragon88 (talk) 18:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DK Flag.jpg

Image:DK Flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andrewthangiah (notify | contribs).

Another image already exists on Wikipedia. Wiki San Roze^†αLҝ 18:22, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fourtf.jpg

Image:Fourtf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alvaro3043 (notify | contribs).

Image appears to be a clip from a video and thus non-free. See caption to this image in Four to the Floor (Starsailor song) Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eva_Avila_April_2007.JPG

Image:Eva_Avila_April_2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SingerGirl72 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned and Unencyclopedic Rettetast (talk) 22:41, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Eva Avila is missing a portrait photo... 70.51.9.251 (talk) 06:14, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Rationale no longer valid - image now added to WP article of notable person pictured. Dl2000 (talk) 15:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still delete We do not keep nonfree images of a living, non-reclusive person. it's replaceable. hbdragon88 (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free?? Wiki San Roze^†αLҝ 20:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Image declared as GFDL i.e. free licence. Appears to be consistent with a personal photo rather than a professional/promo piece. Dl2000 (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I misread it....dunno how I missed the GFDL sign though...my apologies. hbdragon88 (talk) 21:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Image kept -Nv8200p talk 01:01, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Evan_taubenfeld_in_the_studioGFDL-self.jpg

Image:Evan_taubenfeld_in_the_studioGFDL-self.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Evanrocks (notify | contribs).

Orphaned Unencyclopedic Rettetast (talk) 22:42, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]