Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser
- Home
Introduction and rules - User manual
How to use AWB - Discussion
Discuss AWB, report errors, and request features - User tasks
Request or help with AWB-able tasks - Technical
Technical documentation
This is the discussion page for the AutoWikiBrowser (AWB) project. It is also the place to discuss using the AWB program (for help, questions, or general inquiries about AWB). Specific guidelines on where to make particular reports or requests are provided in the § Before you post section below. Before asking a question, please refer to the read the § Frequently asked questions below.
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Before you post
[edit]Do you want to ... | Please use | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a bug or request a feature in AWB? | Check reported bugs on Phabricator before filing a new bug report. You do not need to create another account there; just log in with your global Wikimedia account. See this MediaWiki wiki page on how to report bugs and request features on Phabricator.
| ||||
Report an incorrectly fixed typo? | Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos | ||||
Request approval to use AWB? | Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser | ||||
Ask a question about AWB or ask for help? | This page |
Frequently asked questions
[edit]
Frequently asked questions
|
---|
//Detect IE5.5+ if (navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE")==-1) { // Previous contents go here .... }
|
Discussion
[edit]Special:Tags
[edit]Is there a way to apply Special:Tags (e.g. talk banner shell conversion
) to AWB edits? If so, does it consume the already-precious summary buffer? ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 17:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Multiple blank lines
[edit]Hi, this is related to a change I want to do on Wiktionary, is there a way by AWB to change multiple blank lines to a single blank line? Sample:
====Synonyms==== * [[EXAMPLE]] ====Derived terms==== * [[TERM]]
to
====Synonyms==== * [[EXAMPLE]] ====Derived terms==== * [[TERM]]
Svartava (talk) 08:11, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You can make a strict regex rule to replace
(\n\*[^\r\n]+\]\])\s*\n\s*\n\s*\n\s*(==)
with$1\n\n$2
, which will reduce 2 or more blank lines down to 1. - You can also make a more liberal rule to replace
(\n\*[^\r\n]+\]\])\s*\n\s*(==)
with$1\n\n$2
, which will also expand from 0 blank lines up to 1. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 09:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC)- I think there is a simpler replacement: find
(\S\n)\s+(\n\S)
→$1$2
. Primefac (talk) 13:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)What about WP:STUBSPACING?Oh yeah, now that WP:STUBSPACING is automagic, that's probably safe. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 14:40, 1 January 2025 (UTC)- Thank you both for your help :)) Svartava (talk) 17:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- I think there is a simpler replacement: find
Hatnote order
[edit]This afternoon, Primefac pointed out to me that certain edits I was making were putting the hatnotes in wrong order in a set of articles, as here.
Think is, I was running a similar task last night, and this and other similar edits came out OK. And the only thing I've changed between now and then is uploaded a new list of articles. I've changed none of the AWB settings I was using.
Any idea what might be causing the discrepancy? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you think that AWB itself is changing the order of these hatnotes? Could you include the regex you're using to add the {{Use mdy dates}} template? Kiwipete (talk) 18:59, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Kiwipete: Apologies, I've been out all day. Came home and did a little tinkering to see if I could isolate more of the issue before I came here.
- To answer your question: I simply put "{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}" into the "Append/Prepend text" window, marked "Prepend", and checked the box "Sort metadata after". In every instance over the past few days where I have checked and double-checked, that has been sufficient. (To answer your other question: AWB wasn't changing the order of anything. Rather, in this instance it's properly sorting the metadata after introducing the new hatnote. In this instance, it is not. It is inserting the hatnote and moving on. (A module might fix this, and I haven't had the time to experiment with it today.))
- HOWEVER: I found the issue again on another television article from another batch: see here.
- The two incorrect articles are about television seasons, and I'm wondering if the problem has something to do with the {{italictitle}} template and its siblings. That's the only common denominator I can think of.
- (And please excuse any lack of clarity in my response here - I am severely non-technological, and consequently it's a minor miracle that I've gotten as far as I have in targeting this issue.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 07:17, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Why did you add a blank line between
{{Use mdy dates|date=January 2025}}
&{{Infobox Arizona Legislature
here? ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 20:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)- @Tom.Reding: Wrong "newlines" setting, sorry. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 07:10, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Any updates on running this to ground? (Reupping this so it doesn't disappear into the ether.) --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have made changes today to AWB that should correctly support sorting of {{Use mdy dates}}. I'll release another AWB snapshot later today. I have specifically NOT implemented support for MOS:ORDER point 2 ({{DISPLAYTITLE}}, {{Lowercase title}}, {{Italic title}}) because the text "some of these may also be placed before the infobox or after the infobox" means that I can't see a clear rule AWB can apply for those. Rjwilmsi 14:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Should have limitation on certain parameters of templates
[edit]AWB should have restriction on certain parameters of citation templates. see this diff. It has put a space after comma at url parameter and causes CS1 error. It's ok to have AWB on title parameter of citation templates.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 18:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also consider this diff.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 18:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- @KEmel49: AWB is very configurable and is used for different tasks by different editors. Problems with AWB edits should be raised first with the editor making them.
- @BD2412: Do your regular expressions have something to stop them editing URLs? I tack
(?<!https?://[^ \|\{\}\[\]\<\>]*)
on to the end of some of mine, and that works 99% of the time. -- John of Reading (talk) 18:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)- I generally just eyeball it. 99% of the time, there are just one or two clear errors on the page. What would actually help more would be for the changes to show up more prominently in the AWB edit window. Give me a few minutes and I'll mock up a concept. BD2412 T 19:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, that was more than a few minutes, but I would like the AWB window (top image) to look more like the Wikipedia edit window (bottom image):
- I generally just eyeball it. 99% of the time, there are just one or two clear errors on the page. What would actually help more would be for the changes to show up more prominently in the AWB edit window. Give me a few minutes and I'll mock up a concept. BD2412 T 19:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- In fact, what would be ideal would be for the entire URL to be highlighted in the AWB window when an edit was changing its structure, and/or for AWB to have an alert for that in the alert window. BD2412 T 21:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Can't save at all
[edit]When I try to save any edits with AWB, it justs says "Saving", then "Restarting in 10", waits 10 seconds and re-scans the same page. No edits are made, and nothing appears in the log. Every time I click save, the wait increases by five seconds. Milo8505 (talk) 19:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- None of your edits appear to show an AWB tag so has it ever worked for you? Neils51 (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- No, I have just been given permission recently, but I am on the checkpage.
- Maybe it's something silly I'm doing wrong, as I'm a complete beginner in this program.
- Any help much appreciated.
- Milo8505 (talk) 06:33, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- It was something silly indeed. I had not given my bot password sufficient permissions Facepalm.
- My issue is Resolved
- Thanks!
- Milo8505 (talk) 06:42, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Wheel arrangement
[edit]This edit was flagged up as an error, see edit summary of following edit. John (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redrose64 pinged me on a couple of these as well, however they are hard to spot against various other edits. Perhaps the regex could be rejected if the article contains the string 'locomotive' or similar? Neils51 (talk) 00:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- As that's from typo fixing, I suggest the issue is raised on typos talk page. Rjwilmsi 09:40, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
What does "new" mean?
[edit]On the bottom right there are the numbers "pages/min", "edits/min", "edits", "skipped" and "new". What does "new" mean? I've read the manual but can't seem to find it in it. ―Panamitsu (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Number of pages created i.e. new pages. Rjwilmsi 15:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you mean creation of a page on Wikipedia? That's odd. It said 1 new page for me yesterday but I had not created any new pages. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- That is what it means. AWB increments the new page count before doing the page save (new page creation), so if new page creation fails (e.g. page is salted) then the count could be falsely high. Also, given that the MediaWiki API doesn't raise edit conflicts for self-edit conflicts, one way this could happen would be to prepare an edit to a non-existent (new) page in AWB, in the meantime actually create the page and save an edit in browser, return to AWB and Save. I think the API will accept the second edit via AWB without error, and AWB will think that counted as a page creation as the page didn't exist when AWB loaded it. I'm not saying you did either of those, they're just examples of how the New pages count in AWB could be off. Rjwilmsi 10:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you mean creation of a page on Wikipedia? That's odd. It said 1 new page for me yesterday but I had not created any new pages. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Database scanner alternatives
[edit]Are there any alternatives to the AWB database scanner - in particular, one that can be run on Mac? JWB is a decent alternative for some AWB features, but I haven't been able to find an alternative for this functionality. Thanks – Anne drew (talk · contribs) 16:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
New AWB snapshot
[edit]For anyone wanting to use AWB with fixes since last release (August 2024), I've uploaded a new release snapshot here. You will need to download yourself, it's not a release so AWB Updater won't find it. Rjwilmsi 19:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- The hatnote issue referred to above is still present - I just tried the new release. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:32, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, I hadn't looked at the hatnote issue until today. Try again with the AutoWikiBrowser6312-12712.zip uploaded just now. Rjwilmsi 18:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Rjwilmsi: Thanks. I'll take a look at it tonight and see what I can see. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 18:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, I hadn't looked at the hatnote issue until today. Try again with the AutoWikiBrowser6312-12712.zip uploaded just now. Rjwilmsi 18:14, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Mobile?
[edit]Any chance of ever having a mobile version? Hyperbolick (talk) 08:01, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- First, the current implementation won't work. It is built on the .NET Framework and will only run on Windows, or (I think) Mono. Also, it is covered in "chrome"; many interaction points and text windows that wouldn't fit on a mobile screen.
- Instead, think through what tasks you would like a mobile version to do (others might come up with a different list) and how the UI and the attendant workflow would work. It would probably be easier to start from the current mobile browser, although there is platform-neutral code in the WikiFunctions library you could filch.
- Others have suggested the JWB web-based version, but I have no opinion on that. David Brooks (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
iarchive prefix, delete _??
[edit]In running AWB on Animal welfare in Nazi Germany, genfixes changed [[iarchive:bonzoswaranimals0000camp_y0p5/page/82/mode/2up|Bonzo's War: Animals Under Fire 1939-1945]] to [[iarchive:bonzoswaranimals0000camp y0p5/page/82/mode/2up|Bonzo's War: Animals Under Fire 1939-1945]] (note the removed underscore after 000camp. While the changed link worked, I don't think it should have been changed since the internet archive URL that it goes to is https://archive.org/details/bonzoswaranimals0000camp_y0p5/page/82/mode/2up (note the URL has the underscore) (I didn't save, but that was in the proposed changes.) I don't think underscores should be dropped in things prefixed with [[iarchive: Not sure if this is a bug, will report on Phabricator if it is.Naraht (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Agree. The code that processes the URL expects the string between the two delimiters ( colon and pipe) to be without spaces so the underscore gets put back! Placing '%20' there will also see it resolved to an underscore for IA to us. The AWB underscore replacement is generic, it's often seen replacing non-required underscores in section links (that editors have placed). So, yes, bottom line, a pointless edit that though does no damage (except use clock cycles) will confuse editors and generate these discussions. The template 'iarchive' should really be removed from the 'consideration' list. Good luck with Phabricator, maybe post the reference. Neils51 (talk) 20:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- So iarchive is a kind of interwiki/project link then but to external content. I thought those were called magic links but I think a magic link is/was slightly different. Does anybody have a link to a central page where all of these are documented (I found reference to imdbtitle: as well)? There may be others that AWB needs to ignore for link formatting if their link content is effectively an HTTP path. Rjwilmsi 09:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Whatever they are usually called, they are documented at mw:Manual:Interwiki#Interwiki links to other projects. The list for enwiki (API call) is surprisingly long, but that includes all the "proper" interwiki links as well. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for that. Far too many to make a specific list so I've done something broad to skip any such links from link whitespace formatting. Fixed in rev 12713, will be included in next release of AWB. Rjwilmsi 18:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Whatever they are usually called, they are documented at mw:Manual:Interwiki#Interwiki links to other projects. The list for enwiki (API call) is surprisingly long, but that includes all the "proper" interwiki links as well. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:33, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- So iarchive is a kind of interwiki/project link then but to external content. I thought those were called magic links but I think a magic link is/was slightly different. Does anybody have a link to a central page where all of these are documented (I found reference to imdbtitle: as well)? There may be others that AWB needs to ignore for link formatting if their link content is effectively an HTTP path. Rjwilmsi 09:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)