User talk:Vestrian24Bio/Archives/January 2025
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4000/e4000ddaa17101c6632f28461fb9236ea96a236f" alt="This page's archives can be found at "{{{page_name}}}""
![]() | This talk page is archived. Threads older than 15 days may be archived, manually or automatically. To browse the archives, select the year and month of posts you want to view. 2022: Jan · Feb · Mar · Apr · May · Jun · Jul · Aug · Sep · Oct · Nov · Dec |
Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!
[edit]Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.
For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.
The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
January 2025
[edit] Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Thank you. C F A 18:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- @CFA: I did assume good faith, which is why I posted at WP:RM/T instead of reporting to WP:AIV. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- You called Sportzlove a "vandal" for performing a series of moves you did not agree with. Disruptive? Maybe. But it was not vandalism. I suppose the correct template here would've been {{uw-npa}}. C F A 04:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- There were RM consensus against those moves (Talk:National Cricket League#Requested move 25 September 2016 for example), I listed those moves not because I disagree with them, I listed them because they were against existing RM consensus.
- Also per WP:MOVEVANDAL, which says
Changing the names of pages to disruptive, irrelevant, or otherwise inappropriate names.
Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 04:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)- Move vandalism would have involved moving Genghis Khan to Idiot, for example. The action of moving against consensus may have been disruptive, but the titles themselves were not vandalism. See WP:NOTVANDAL:
In short, all vandalism is disruptive editing, but not all disruptive editing is vandalism.
. C F A 04:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- Move vandalism would have involved moving Genghis Khan to Idiot, for example. The action of moving against consensus may have been disruptive, but the titles themselves were not vandalism. See WP:NOTVANDAL:
- You called Sportzlove a "vandal" for performing a series of moves you did not agree with. Disruptive? Maybe. But it was not vandalism. I suppose the correct template here would've been {{uw-npa}}. C F A 04:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions discussion
[edit]Hello Vestrian24Bio,
I know you are better editor than me as you have been editing on wikpedia scince very long time. But your move about Template:Twenty20 competitions is worng this time. The domestic cricket competitions templete are written in the way displayed in eg: Template:First-class cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions. So, don't take the things on ego. Anything better is good. This is not international cricket competions. It's domestic cricket competitions, And there is no need of defunct competitions to be mentioned as the are deeply discused in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions. Only ICC memebrs team competitions should be mentined. So, I request to don't mess it.
Hope you get it. Wating for your reply. So, I can move the tempalte to Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions and make edit to the template or you move it and edit it likewise in Template:List A cricket domestic competitions.🙏 Csknp (talk) 07:07, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Csknp: Twenty20 cricket is more significant than List A or First-class cricket, thus it should be treated similar to Template:International cricket. Vestrian24Bio 08:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- No it shouldn't, and you need to get consensus from cricket editors if you want to treat it differently. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Joseph2302: The T20 template has been like this, in cases of WP:CONSISTENT it's the List A and First-class templates that should be changed to include all notable competitions. But, I would agree we'd need a wider discussion before making any changes. Vestrian24Bio 09:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes Twenty20 cricket is more significant but you should also consider we are not taking about International cricket, it's about domestic Twenty20 cricket. So, why to treate it like Template:International cricket if there has been a template follwed for domestic competitions like in Template:List A cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions So, in my opinion Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions should also be made in same way🙏 . Csknp (talk) 09:32, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd say all cricket navboxes, (regardless of whether international or domestic) should be in the same way. Vestrian24Bio 09:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- No it shouldn't, there is difference between international and domestic cricket. Both have different level. So, why to compare it. Rather doing things follwed previously for domestic cricket template. Csknp (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd disagree with that and also from your above comment,
no need of defunct competitions to be mentioned
- why? all related page links should be given in a navbox.the are deeply discused in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions
- so...?Only ICC memebrs team competitions should be mentined
- why is that?
- Also we should do this discussion in a template talk page rather than my user talk page and should get input from other editors as well. Vestrian24Bio 09:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Only ICC memebrs team competitions should be mentined - Beacuse those touranments are only important and necessary for international competitions.
- They are deeply discused in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions and no need of defunct competitions to be mentioned - So, every defunt tournament mentioned will make the template longer and currently every ICC memebrs country have many Twenty20 competitions (including leagues) which has made the template longer already. And if any local t20 competitions is being held with out the respective country cricket board why should it be mentioned in template. If you are too concerd about defunct competitions and related page links should be given in a navbox. Then, make a template named Template:Defunct Twenty20 cricket competitions and place it there.
- Csknp (talk) 10:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Defunct teams should be kept, as it's a navigation box so it helps navigate between them. However, I have realised that not all of these T20 competitions are "domestic" as there are a number of "international" ones that have teams from multiple countries. This seems like it needs a wider discussion at WT:CRIC, though if international T20 tournaments are listed here, the name should not include domestic. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. That's why i had tried to edit Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions with only ICC memebrs domestic competition (including league) as per standard domestic template in Template:First-class cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions. But User:Vestrian24Bio has been undoing edits. In my opinion for defunct competition seprate template should be made otherwise there is no reason of it as defunct and "international competitions" ones that have teams from multiple countries all are meintioned in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions. Csknp (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Csknp, Domestic or Multi-national they are Twenty20 competitions. We should go for less templates with more links as opposed to more templates with less links as you are proposing. Also, there's nothing with a navbox being long, have you seen international cricket season navboxes... And even if we create separate navboxes as you're proposing they are most likely to end-up being merged together through TfD. Vestrian24Bio 12:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Go and see Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions now. It must be ok now as there is both current and defunct Twenty20 competitions mentioned. Csknp (talk) 13:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- You should not do this until a consensus is reached, I will raise this at WT:CRIC. Vestrian24Bio 01:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket#Template:Twenty20 competitions. Vestrian24Bio 02:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- You should not do this until a consensus is reached, I will raise this at WT:CRIC. Vestrian24Bio 01:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Go and see Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions now. It must be ok now as there is both current and defunct Twenty20 competitions mentioned. Csknp (talk) 13:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Csknp, Domestic or Multi-national they are Twenty20 competitions. We should go for less templates with more links as opposed to more templates with less links as you are proposing. Also, there's nothing with a navbox being long, have you seen international cricket season navboxes... And even if we create separate navboxes as you're proposing they are most likely to end-up being merged together through TfD. Vestrian24Bio 12:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. That's why i had tried to edit Template:Twenty20 cricket domestic competitions with only ICC memebrs domestic competition (including league) as per standard domestic template in Template:First-class cricket domestic competitions and Template:List A cricket domestic competitions. But User:Vestrian24Bio has been undoing edits. In my opinion for defunct competition seprate template should be made otherwise there is no reason of it as defunct and "international competitions" ones that have teams from multiple countries all are meintioned in List of Twenty20 cricket competitions. Csknp (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Defunct teams should be kept, as it's a navigation box so it helps navigate between them. However, I have realised that not all of these T20 competitions are "domestic" as there are a number of "international" ones that have teams from multiple countries. This seems like it needs a wider discussion at WT:CRIC, though if international T20 tournaments are listed here, the name should not include domestic. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd disagree with that and also from your above comment,
- No it shouldn't, there is difference between international and domestic cricket. Both have different level. So, why to compare it. Rather doing things follwed previously for domestic cricket template. Csknp (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd say all cricket navboxes, (regardless of whether international or domestic) should be in the same way. Vestrian24Bio 09:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- No it shouldn't, and you need to get consensus from cricket editors if you want to treat it differently. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:11, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Mario GA fail
[edit]Hello Vestrian, it seems that you failed my GA nom of the Super Mario Bros. Movie, citing the top 50 authors list. While it’s important for nominators to have correspondent editing history, this scenario did not entirely warrant a closure, since my contributions were not minimal. Perhaps a reconsideration of the closure and a different view of the “drive-by” rule could ensure the article becomes of high quality to readers. Thank you.
PS: Thank you for picking up my GA nom of Pixels (2015 film); it’s been needing a review for a month. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 03:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Yovt: I'm a little busy today, I will look into it tomorrow. Vestrian24Bio 08:22, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power season 1
[edit]Thank you very much for your review. This is a big article and I know it took a lot of work to review it properly. Much appreciated. - adamstom97 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Adamstom.97: You're welcome! It's my pleasure to review the article. Always happy to help! Vestrian24Bio 09:27, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-03
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- The Single User Login system is being updated over the next few months. This is the system which allows users to fill out the login form on one Wikimedia site and get logged in on all others at the same time. It needs to be updated because of the ways that browsers are increasingly restricting cross-domain cookies. To accommodate these restrictions, login and account creation pages will move to a central domain, but it will still appear to the user as if they are on the originating wiki. The updated code will be enabled this week for users on test wikis. This change is planned to roll out to all users during February and March. See the SUL3 project page for more details and a timeline.
Updates for editors
- On wikis with PageAssessments installed, you can now filter search results to pages in a given WikiProject by using the
inproject:
keyword. (These wikis: Arabic Wikipedia, English Wikipedia, English Wikivoyage, French Wikipedia, Hungarian Wikipedia, Nepali Wikipedia, Turkish Wikipedia, Chinese Wikipedia) [1] - One new wiki has been created: a Wikipedia in Tigre (
w:tig:
) [2] View all 35 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, there was a bug with updating a user's edit-count after making a rollback edit, which is now fixed. [3]
Updates for technical contributors
Wikimedia REST API users, such as bot operators and tool maintainers, may be affected by ongoing upgrades. Starting the week of January 13, we will begin rerouting some page content endpoints from RESTbase to the newer MediaWiki REST API endpoints for all wiki projects. This change was previously available on testwiki and should not affect existing functionality, but active users of the impacted endpoints may raise issues directly to the MediaWiki Interfaces Team in Phabricator if they arise.
- Toolforge tool maintainers can now share their feedback on Toolforge UI, an initiative to provide a web platform that allows creating and managing Toolforge tools through a graphic interface, in addition to existing command-line workflows. This project aims to streamline active maintainers’ tasks, as well as make registration and deployment processes more accessible for new tool creators. The initiative is still at a very early stage, and the Cloud Services team is in the process of collecting feedback from the Toolforge community to help shape the solution to their needs. Read more and share your thoughts about Toolforge UI.
For tool and library developers who use the OAuth system: The identity endpoint used for OAuth 1 and OAuth 2 returned a JSON object with an integer in its
sub
field, which was incorrect (the field must always be a string). This has been fixed; the fix will be deployed to Wikimedia wikis on the week of January 13. [4]- Many wikis currently use Cite CSS to render custom footnote markers in Parsoid output. Starting January 20 these rules will be disabled, but the developers ask you to not clean up your MediaWiki:Common.css until February 20 to avoid issues during the migration. Your wikis might experience some small changes to footnote markers in Visual Editor and when using experimental Parsoid read mode, but if there are changes these are expected to bring the rendering in line with the legacy parser output. [5]
Meetings and events
- The next meeting in the series of Wikimedia Foundation Community Conversations with the Wikimedia Commons community will take place on January 15 at 8:00 UTC and at 16:00 UTC. The topic of this call is defining the priorities in tool investment for Commons. Contributors from all wikis, especially users who are maintaining tools for Commons, are welcome to attend.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 01:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 January 2025
[edit]- From the editors: Looking back, looking forward
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024
- In the media: Will you be targeted?
- Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last
- Opinion: Reflections one score hence
- Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next
- Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics
- Humour: How to make friends on Wikipedia
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia Top 25 Reports in 2025
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/684b8/684b8f387cec0a0ad33be9455d49b1b40c077bd2" alt=""
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia Top 25 Reports in 2025 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
[edit]![]() |
The Reviewer Barnstar | |
For your efforts with the Arrowverse GAs Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 14:47, 17 January 2025 (UTC) |
- @OlifanofmrTennant thanks! Vestrian24Bio 16:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
One of the Girls GA
[edit]Hi, I noticed another user submitted the article "One of the Girls" for a good article nomination and it was failed by you as they did not contribute to the article. As the article's main contributor, I'd be happy to work with you to make the article GA. I've submitted it myself this time as a GA nominee, let me know if you'd be interested again! Flabshoe1 (talk) 15:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Flabshoe1: I've picked up the GAN, but I'm a little busy now. It might take take a day or three to go on with the review, hope you don't mind the delay. Vestrian24Bio 16:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sounds good, no worries about the delay! Flabshoe1 (talk) 16:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-04
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Updates for editors
- Administrators can mass-delete multiple pages created by a user or IP address using Extension:Nuke. It previously only allowed deletion of pages created in the last 30 days. It can now delete pages from the last 90 days, provided it is targeting a specific user or IP address. [6]
- On wikis that use the Patrolled edits feature, when the rollback feature is used to revert an unpatrolled page revision, that revision will now be marked as "manually patrolled" instead of "autopatrolled", which is more accurate. Some editors that use filters on Recent Changes may need to update their filter settings. [7]
View all 31 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week. For example, the Visual Editor's "Insert link" feature did not always suggest existing pages properly when an editor started typing, which has now been fixed.
Updates for technical contributors
- The Structured Discussion extension (also known as Flow) is being progressively removed from the wikis. This extension is unmaintained and causes issues. It will be replaced by DiscussionTools, which is used on any regular talk page. The last group of wikis (Catalan Wikiquote, Wikimedia Finland, Goan Konkani Wikipedia, Kabyle Wikipedia, Portuguese Wikibooks, Wikimedia Sweden) will soon be contacted. If you have questions about this process, please ping Trizek (WMF) at your wiki. [8]
- The latest quarterly Technical Community Newsletter is now available. This edition includes: updates about services from the Data Platform Engineering teams, information about Codex from the Design System team, and more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 01:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
TFL notification
[edit]Hi, Vestrian24Bio. I'm just posting to let you know that 2024 Men's T20 World Cup statistics – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 21. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 01:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Giants2008 thanks. Vestrian24Bio 10:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2024 Men's T20 World Cup Groups
[edit]Template:2024 Men's T20 World Cup Groups has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:32, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of 2028 Women's T20 World Cup for deletion
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82ae2/82ae28fed0d04b1deda6d02d2dc5a292111aaf24" alt=""
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Women's T20 World Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.QEnigma talk 05:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Tech News: 2025-05
[edit]Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Weekly highlight
- Patrollers and admins - what information or context about edits or users could help you to make patroller or admin decisions more quickly or easily? The Wikimedia Foundation wants to hear from you to help guide its upcoming annual plan. Please consider sharing your thoughts on this and 13 other questions to shape the technical direction for next year.
Updates for editors
- iOS Wikipedia App users worldwide can now access a personalized Year in Review feature, which provides insights based on their reading and editing history on Wikipedia. This project is part of a broader effort to help welcome new readers as they discover and interact with encyclopedic content.
Edit patrollers now have a new feature available that can highlight potentially problematic new pages. When a page is created with the same title as a page which was previously deleted, a tag ('Recreated') will now be added, which users can filter for in Special:RecentChanges and Special:NewPages. [9]
- Later this week, there will be a new warning for editors if they attempt to create a redirect that links to another redirect (a double redirect). The feature will recommend that they link directly to the second redirect's target page. Thanks to the user SomeRandomDeveloper for this improvement. [10]
Wikimedia wikis allow WebAuthn-based second factor checks (such as hardware tokens) during login, but the feature is fragile and has very few users. The MediaWiki Platform team is temporarily disabling adding new WebAuthn keys, to avoid interfering with the rollout of SUL3 (single user login version 3). Existing keys are unaffected. [11]
View all 30 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week.
Updates for technical contributors
- For developers that use the MediaWiki History dumps: The Data Platform Engineering team has added a couple of new fields to these dumps, to support the Temporary Accounts initiative. If you maintain software that reads those dumps, please review your code and the updated documentation, since the order of the fields in the row will change. There will also be one field rename: in the
mediawiki_user_history
dump, theanonymous
field will be renamed tois_anonymous
. The changes will take effect with the next release of the dumps in February. [12]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi, Nimrou. I'm afraid I'll be unavailable from today, for the medium term at least, so I think it may be best to close this GAN unless you can complete it without my assistance. Sorry for the inconvenience, but thanks for your interest, and all the best. Beir bua! ReturnDuane (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ReturnDuane: When will you get back? Vestrian24Bio 10:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- After this morning, it will be weeks, possibly months. Sorry, but I can't be specific. ReturnDuane (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ReturnDuane: Okay, I will close the GAN. When you get back just leave me a message and we'll do the rest of the review then. Vestrian24Bio 10:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- That's fair enough. Thanks again. ReturnDuane (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome
Vestrian24Bio 11:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- You're welcome
- That's fair enough. Thanks again. ReturnDuane (talk) 11:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- @ReturnDuane: Okay, I will close the GAN. When you get back just leave me a message and we'll do the rest of the review then. Vestrian24Bio 10:57, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- After this morning, it will be weeks, possibly months. Sorry, but I can't be specific. ReturnDuane (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Your WikiCup submissions: two GAN reviews
[edit]Hi Vestrian24Bio, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Talk:The Two Hundred/GA2 and Talk:Best Friends Forever (South Park)/GA1 for GANR points in the WikiCup. Unfortunately, neither review is long enough: they are both quick fails with one sentence of text. As per Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, such reviews are ineligible for points; you can only claim points for sufficiently detailed reviews, and quick fails usually don't qualify for points in any case. Epicgenius (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Got it, thanks for the message. Vestrian24Bio 02:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 31 January 2025 (UTC)