User talk:Unready

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Archives:

• 2010-

IP list

That's tremendously useful thanks! Can you move the 316kb list from my talk page though to Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon/IP invite list? Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Unready (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One thing, would it be possible to filter down that list by IPs who've made multiple constructive edits over several different days in that period? I'm not sure it would be a good thing to notify them all that's all, but the ones who seem more active and not having work reverted etc. Can you filter down to something like that? Perhaps exclude all of the ones who've made less than 5 edits?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to filter by constructive edits, except by reviewing them all. The table is sortable, so you can sort by number of edits, then pick the more prolific contributors. --Unready (talk) 13:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I think the best thing though might be say over a month, create a list of African IPs by edit count of say the top 500 editors or something like that? if we can find the top 500 most active African IPs we can invite them to create an account and participate. Would that be possible?♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:04, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The data in the table is a month of contributions, from 9 Sep to 9 Oct. If you click the "Contribution count" header, the table sorts by contribution count. --Unready (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Technical Barnstar
		Thank you so much for generating that list! I had no idea how to do that, and it's a huge help!_ Tazerdadog (talk) 05:19, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Security review RfC 2016

Hi Unready, thanks for contributing to the 2016 security review RfC draft - I've added some more clarity to the page, as it may have not been clear it was a RfC which is still being drafted. If you have any further suggestions for implementing password audits please feel free to leave a message on the draft RfC's talk page or at this Village Pump (Technical) thread. If you have any questions please feel free to drop me a message -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 18:17, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roger. --Unready (talk) 18:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Unready. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The commonscat linking to commons gallery thing

Hello my friend. All is archived with no action. I'm astonished that it got wide support and nothing got done. I am so grateful you wrote that code. Could we please persue this together. I'd be happy to write to some of the supporters at commons as well. Is there a next step here? Post at meta? Best wishes. :)

Convenience links:

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Anna Frodesiak: I would say the way to proceed is:

We should be sure that the code does what you want and that what it produces looks the way you want. You kind of avoided it before, but you can put the code in your personal common.js on commons, then visit a few galleries to see the results. At the moment, it looks kind of bland, because I wanted to be sure of function.
Once you're satisfied it fulfills your requirements, I would suggest asking for comments, probably as an RfC either on commons:Commons:Village pump/Proposals or on commons:MediaWiki talk:Common.js. I think VPP is probably the better place, because it's probably more widely read than a MediaWiki talk page and because the proposal should probably suggest putting any styling in Common.css. It would be weird to have a proposal that affects Common.css on the talk page of Common.js.
It's possible someone may suggest an alternate solution, but the proposal itself should address why a bot, a template, or user duplication are not desirable or are actually infeasible. If the proposal is accepted, the commons admins would implement it.

Let me know what you think. --Unready (talk) 19:17, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Unready. I've posted to centralize the discussion at Commons pump. I'd best let others check it out. Many, many thanks. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:49, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Unready. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Unready. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

editToken

Hello Unready,

Your script User:Unready/ui.wikimarks.js is no longer functional because it attempts to get an editToken from mw.user.tokens. The script should instead get a csrfToken. editTokens were removed from mw.user.tokens on October 3, 2019 at Phabricator during this edit as they were redundant to csrfTokens.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. --Unready (talk) 09:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]