User talk:Steven rose

Welcome!

Hello, Steven rose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Genigraphics did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Separate Note

The trademark Genigraphics was eventually abandoned by GE, and is currently registered to an unrelated printing business.

If I am to understand this right, your claim is that the printing business being referred to is what the article should be about, correct? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is correct. Genigraphics has been operated continuously since 1973 and the trademarks have always been maintained and transferred to current ownership (easily verified through uspto.gov). The company has changed focus from 35mm slides to large format printing, just as IBM migrated from typewriters to computers.

I apologize that I'm not terribly familiar with how Wikipedia edits work. http://computationalculture.net/one-damn-slide-after-another-powerpoint-at-every-occasion-for-speech/ https://www.google.com/books/edition/Sweating_Bullets/t3INw5KknpYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=253

Help me!

Hello Steven rose. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Yes, that is correct. Genigraphics has been operated continuously since 1973 and the trademarks have always been maintained and transferred to current ownership (easily verified through uspto.gov). The company has changed focus from 35mm slides to large format printing, just as IBM migrated from typewriters to computers.

I apologize that I'm not terribly familiar with how Wikipedia edits work. http://computationalculture.net/one-damn-slide-after-another-powerpoint-at-every-occasion-for-speech/ https://www.google.com/books/edition/Sweating_Bullets/t3INw5KknpYC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=253

As it currently stands, the page implies that Genigraphics went out of business in 1994. This is incorrect and the company not only contributed to PowerPoint development through 2001 but has thrived ever since. There has been no discontinuity in operations through the various ownership changes.

Steven rose (talk) 02:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing... I am currently looking into this for you. Please expect a response as soon as possible. Thank you! :D –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity Question

I looked up the bankruptcy records for Genigraphics Corporation and Genigraphics Service. They filed in Connecticut Bankruptcy Court on 24 November 1992, and the case closed in 20 January 2006. At the time of filing, they were clearly based in Fairfield, Connecticut. According to its website, Genigraphics LLC has a PO box in Kansas. Orders are, furthermore, placed in Central Standard Time rather than EST. This is not to mention that the names of the companies are remarkably different (not more so than Blockbuster LLC and its predecessor BB Liquidating Inc., however-- which we list as the same thing). My concern is that if none of the operations are the same, the owners are different, and they don't even share a similar location; then what exactly is the connection besides the trademarked name. I could theoretically buy the rights to Radioshack name, but that wouldn't mean I was the successor to Radioshack.

I can't draw any consistent conclusions from this matter. I will ask if you consider the article possibly being worthy of deletion? That might be the best solution if it is going to be completely inaccurate, wildly unsourced, and go without any clear claims of Notability. Cheers, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 03:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"In 1994, with only a dozen or so companies in the industry, primarily young and entrepreneurial in nature, the company was well ahead of the game in its technological development. That would all change over the next few years as the industry exploded with growth. That year, the company formed the subsidiary In Focus Services, Inc. and, in August, acquired certain assets and liabilities of Genigraphics Corporation and Genigraphics Service Corporation for $1.5 million, an acquisition which helped lead to a 67 percent increase in sales for 1994. " https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/history2/38/In-Focus-Systems-Inc.html

"Mark has served as vice president of marketing and sales for a former division of General Electric, as senior vice president of sales, marketing and services for InFocus Systems, and as the CEO of that company’s first acquisition, Genigraphics Corporation. " https://www.censis.com/team/mark-reed/

"Genigraphics Production Manager Genigraphics Juli 1986 – September 1994 8 Jahre 3 Monate Bellevue, WA

Jim managed a team of computer artists at Genigraphics' Bellevue, WA office. His team provided computer generated design support for a broad range of Seattle-area clients including the Microsoft senior executive team."

"Manager - Client Services InFocus Systems Juni 1994 – März 1998 3 Jahre 10 Monate Wilsonville, OR

During the hay day of InFocus' rise to market leadership in the electronic project industry, Jim managed their Client Services organization - an entrepreneurial team within the organization that brought presentation skills coaching support as well as high end presentation design services to InFocus customers.

During that time, Jim was also an award-winning columnist for Presentations magazine and developed a national reputation in the area of presentation messaging, advanced design & delivery skills coaching." https://at.linkedin.com/in/jimendicott/de Jim Endicott served as General Manager.

"The Fonts collection is used by the Geni Wizard to determine whether any of the fonts in the specified presentation won't be supported when Genigraphics images the slides. If you just want to set character formatting for a particular bullet or text range, use the Font property to return the Font object for the bullet or text range.

The Genigraphics wizard enables users to transmit their presentations directly to Genigraphics for conversion into film slides, overhead transparencies, or other specialized media formats. For more information about the services Genigraphics provides, visit the Genigraphics Web site. This service might not be available outside the United States." https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/office/developer/office-2010/ff764006%28v%3Doffice.14%29

"Genigraphics eventually entered Chapter 11, but was briefly rescued in 1994 by electronic projector manufacturer In Focus Systems.This relationship only lasted a few years, however; Genigraphics was eventually resold in an ongoing attempt to figure out how to leverage the presence of SEND TO GENI-GRAPHICS in the PowerPointFILEmenu on 10 million desk-tops. PowerPoint 95, introduced in August 1995, was based ona whole new code, VisualC++." https://www.indezine.com/stuff/guppt.pdf

"PowerPoint includes a special feature that enables a user to send the presentation file to the Genigraphics service bureau for producing 35mm slides, digital color overhead transparencies, large display prints, and posters. If the Genigraphics Wizard is installed, choose File > Send To > Genigraphics to open the Genigraphics Wizard that guides a user through the packaging of a slide." https://books.google.com/books?id=DtICtf_zU5oC&pg=PA150&lpg=PA150&dq=%22genigraphics%22+powerpoint+wizard&source=bl&ots=Br0Hi8wIPP&sig=ACfU3U2B5_ctkqiU8FTEiDD04PKuSX-tbQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjq56X1k-rgAhVOHqwKHdedB1IQ6AEwCnoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22genigraphics%22%20powerpoint%20wizard&f=false

Certain employees, like Jeff Scarpace, worked through the ownership changes. Mr. Scarpace, in particular, started imaging slides for Genigraphics in March 1991 and later became involved with PowerPoint development until October 2000. https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffrey-scarpace

Here is the mention of the MacWorld pr conference for joint development with Microsoft.

https://books.google.com/books?id=t3INw5KknpYC&pg=261#v=onepage&q&f=false

December 2019

Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:Wikipedians without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ——SN 54129 06:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Digital poster session.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Digital poster session.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]