User talk:Riteshkochar

Welcome!

Hello, Riteshkochar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Venustas 12 (talk) 21:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —SpacemanSpiff 20:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 20:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HareKrishnaPortal for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 20:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Riteshkochar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks for review the links i have submited, i noticed my account is blocked due to some reason, i have submited relevent links to the subject, and the information on the links given are very relevent and most important, the site content most authentic and true knowledge, kinldy review the sites and the content before taking any action, from the links i have submited on many pages if you think that is not relevent on any particular page, i will remove them and try to keep as per strict policy, in reference to HareKrishnaPortal the links are nothing to do with HareKrishna they are different, if you review in details you will know, i kindly request to review the links and take necessery actions. Thank you for your valuable time for considering my request. Ritesh

Decline reason:

You were spamming and you were justifiably blocked for doing so. You even made secondary edits to try to disguise some of your link additions. Selket ^Talk 21:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.