User talk:Naiwaar

Welcome!

Hello, Naiwaar!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Whpq (talk) 19:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United We Stand (novel), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Sundawn,

I greatly appreciate your feedback. Thank you for much, I am working on it. Naiwaar (talk) 20:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Naiwaar! Your additions to Heart and Soul: The Story of America and African Americans have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kazamzam (talk) 15:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know that.I ensure that it was happened unintentionally. Naiwaar (talk) 15:31, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. - Kazamzam (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Hi,

I've had to undo many of your edits adding references such as this one, as they are not useful as references, and also placed incorrectly. Improvements to referencing really should be to independent reliable sources and not to a page of the subject's web site or publisher. As you are a new editor, I suggest you take the tutorial mentioned in the welcome message above. -- Whpq (talk) 19:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

You were previously warned about copyright violations, and acknowledged it, yet you continued to copy copyrighted text. Wikipedia is a freely licensed encyclopedia, and you cannot paste in copyrighted text. Continued copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. -- Whpq (talk) 20:19, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discriminant Book

Hello @Naiwaar: How goes it? I had to revert your addition of that yumpu reference on the above article. Never use yumpu generally as its a self-publishing platform. Alright if you want to create and self-publishe a journal or magazine or something like that but unsuitable for Wikipedia in general. Don't use it. That document you linked to has been created from an amalgamation of a large number of German documents from the Kriegsmarine period. It is a complete disaster. Not only isn't there any author information or publishing information associated with that document, making it virtually useless as a source that can be checked to be correct, this amalgamation of perfectly fine period documentation into a single whole is crap. Some of these docs are unrelated to each other and from completely different time frames with no frame or date references to each other and then presented as a cogent whole. It is a bit of a puzzlement to me. Either way, both the platform and this document are unsuitable for Wikipedia and this article. Don't add it back in. scope_creep^Talk 16:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Privilege Management Infrastructure, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 00:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Bodiadub per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bodiadub. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 16:47, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]