User talk:Lucyemma

September 2010

Your addition to Strategic Communication Laboratories has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. your added material was taken straight from http://www.scl.cc/history.php WuhWuzDat 14:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Strategic Communication Laboratories, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. WuhWuzDat 14:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, Lucyemma. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Strategic Communication Laboratories, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Widefox; talk 22:58, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia for advertising purposes. Also, your company has used several different accounts to edit articles on themselves. I'm concerned that these accounts are being used in a coordinated fashion to promote SCL. If one or more of these accounts has intention to make edits to WP unrelated to SCL, or if a single one of these accounts wishes to attempt to work with other editors to create a page on SCL that does not violate our policies, you can request an unblock; but you cannot simply return to creating articles on subjects you have a conflict of interest for. Again, it may be possible for there to be an article on SCL, but we'll need to make sure it meets our notability guidelines and is written neutrally/non-promotionally. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:04, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]