User talk:Fadesga/Archives/2021/April
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Category:French Ministers for Work and Social Security has been nominated for renaming to Category:French Ministers of Labour and Social Affairs
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:French Ministers for Work and Social Security has been nominated for renaming to Category:French Ministers of Labour and Social Affairs. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 16:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Badaic languages
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Category:Badaic languages requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Stub tagging
Please re-read the guideline about stubs and follow it. It seems that you are tagging articles as stubs too liberally.
Please keep in mind that stubs populate categories, an if someone looks into a category to select an article for expanding, it is very frustrating to frequently hit pages which are not really expandable.
Therefore please don't do this tagging mechanistically and apply some brain power to judge not only page size, but its expandability as well. Lembit Staan (talk) 22:57, 26 April 2021 (UTC)