User talk:Eino81

Image copyright problem with Image:Parvusz.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parvusz.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 14:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Parvusz1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parvusz1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:08, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Parvusz2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Parvusz2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 09:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Ecser cimere.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Ecser cimere.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Ecser cimere.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ungersk/svensk

Min far var ungrare - men jag föddes i utlandet. Jag lärde ungerska som barn i Stockholm men tyvärr glömmde jag bårt det ganska snart. Jag besökte Ungern första gången c:a 2004 - lunsch i Sopron. Och nu kann jag engleska bäst.

Var bor Du?

AndersW (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vi bor i Vienna, Virginia. Min mor kände Ingrid Beach, änka till Edward L. Beach, Jr.. Derras son Hugh Beach forskar i Sami folket. Och min morbror var frivillig i Finlands vinter krieg 1939. Annars vet jag mycket lite om Finland eller Lapland.

AndersW (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Hungarian players of American soccer

Category:Hungarian players of American soccer, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 02:51, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Bilinguals

Category:Bilinguals, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 02:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article about Ecser in Afrikaans

Hi Eino81.

I am busy creating the afrikaans version of your article. It would be very helpful if you could also translate the Gallery picture discriptions onto the english page. Thanks. Arnobarnard (talk) 15:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of Ecser done see it on af:Etser. Arnobarnard (talk) 13:13, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Parvusz

They're gone; the article looks fine. Nice job. Happy editing, Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 23:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

gv:Párvusz

Ta'n art chyndaait aym nish as t'eh ry-akin er Wikipedia Ghaelgagh.
I have translated that article and it can be viewed over at the Manx Wikipedia. --MacTire02 (talk) 22:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

es:Párvusz

Now Párvusz article in Spanish my friend. Do You want tranlate this article in Aztec language (Nahuatl) or Galician language?. Marrovi (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cebuano translation

Hi there, I'm not that well-versed in the Cebuano language, so I asked one of my colleagues in the Cebuano Wikipedia to do the translation.

Thanks for your interest in our language, and may you receive many more translations. --Pare Mo (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Text

Nice story you wrote about that lonely man, example for the Saamis. I could find myself quit well in it because the West-Flemish language is also threaneded heavily by the Dutch language. Even most West-Flemish don't even support the West-Flemish wikipedia.. We only have like 40 active wikipedia users while they are about 1.5 million people who speak West-Flemish. I was going to transelate it, but somebody else was earlier. --David-bel (talk) 16:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Icelandic translation

Ég

Ég tilheyri fornu fólki, við erum forn, í öllum þessum heimi. Ég tala forna tungu, mína eigin tungu. Ég bý í fornu landi, Ég hef aldrei átt heima annars staðar, og ég á heima hér. Þetta er ég, ég sjálfur. Ég er einn í hinum stóra heimi. Ég er einn, þjóð mín hvarf á brott fyrir löngu síðan, aðeins ég var eftir. Ég tala mína fornu tungu einn.

Ég ráfa eftir götunni sem kallast líf, Ég borða brauð mitt og ég drekk vatn mitt einn. Það er ég sem skrifa mínar bækur og ég er sá sem les þær. Ég klíf fjöllin á bak við húsið mitt;ég ég næ í fiskinn úr ánni sem er fyrir framan húsið mitt. Á hverjum degi fer ég upp í hæðirnar til að hugsa og til þess að hugleiða einn, aðeins ég einsamall. Þegar ég var í burtu sá ég annað fólk; sumt þeirra kom til landsins míns. Ég var góður við það. Ég gaf þeim mat og drykk, þau gátu hvílst í húsum mínum.

Og nú...þegar ókunnuga ber að garði, segja þeir mér hvað ég eigi að gera og hvað ég má og má ekki. En hér er ég húsbóndi, Ég er eigandinn, Ég er sá sem er heima. Þetta er mitt forna heimili, þar sem feður mínir og feður þeirra bjuggu. Þetta er mitt heimili, mitt land; Ég bý hér einn.

--Jóhann Heiðar Árnason (talk) 18:45, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Luganda translation

Hello, check my userpage for the Luganda translation of your poem.Fsmatovu (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Abantu mwensibuka baava dda nnyo, abantu ebedda ennyo, mu nsi muno. Olulimi lwe njogera lwaava dda nnyo, olulimi lwange. Mbeera mu nsi eyedda, ssibeerangako walala wonna, wano we wange. Nze nzennyini. Ndi bwoomu mu nsi eno ennene. Ndi bwoomu, eggwanga lyange lyasaana wo dda, nze nnasigalawo nzekka. Olulimi lwange olwedda, ndw'ogera nzekka.

Mbundabunda mu luguudo oluyitibwa obulamu, omugaati ngulya bwoomu era n'amazzi nganywa bwoomu. Nze n'ewandikira ebitabo era nze by'esomera. Nninnya ensozi eziri emmanju wange; nze n'evubira ebyennyanja mu mugga oguli mu maaso g'ennyumba yange. Buli lunaku ngenda mu nsozi okw'ekubaganya ebirowoozo n'okutetenkanya, obwoomu, nzekka. Bwe nnali ssiriiwo, nnalaba abantu abala, abamu kubo bajja ku ttaka lyange. Nnabaaniriza. Nabawa emmere awamu n'amazzi, nnabaalira obuliri bawummulireko mu nnyumba zange.

Naye kati...abagwiira, bangamba bwe baba bazze wano, nti "kola kino", nti "kino tokikola", be bampa amateeka. Naye nze nnannyinimu, nze nannyini nyumba, gano amaka gange. Gano ge maka gange agedda, bataata bange ne bajjajjange mwe baabeeranga. Gano ge maka gange, mu ttaka lyange; mbeera wano nzekka. Fsmatovu (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the poem in Luganda would be Nzennyini. That approximates Myself better than Nzekka, which translates to Me Alone. Fsmatovu (talk) 16:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sepedi translation

Hello,

I am currently travelling, I will work on your translation as soon as I get back home/work. Mohau (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully it was not such a long wait ..... Here is your tranlsation;

Nna

Segologolo ke batho bao ke lego leloko la bona, re ba segologolo, lefaseng le. Ke bolela polelo ya segologolo, polelo yaka. Ke dula nageng ya segologolo, ga seke ka dula gongwe, ke modudi wa mo. Yo ke nna. Ke nnoši lefaseng le le legolo. Ke nnoši, setšhaba saka sefitile kgale, go šetše nna. Ke bolela polelo ya segologolo ke nnoši.

Ke thalalo tsela ya bophelo, ke ja borotho, ebile ke nwa meetse ke nnoši. Ke nna yo a ngwalago dipuku tša ka ebuke ke nna yo a dibalago. Ke namela dithaba tšeo dilego morago ga ntlo yaka, nna ke hwetša dihlapi nokeng yeo e lego pele ga ntlo yaka. Ka mehla ke namela meboto goyo nagana lego gopola ke nnoši, nna fela ke nnoši. Ge ke sepela sepela, ke bone batho ba bangwe, bangwe ba tšwa nageng yaka. Ke ba loketše. Ka bafa dijo le dino, ba kgona go khutša ntlong tšaka.

Bjale.. batho šele ba tla mo, ba bolela seo ke swanelago go se dira, le seo ke dumelelago go se dira. Efela mo, ke mongmobu, ke mong,ke gae. Le ke legae laka la segologolo, moo bopapa le bopapa ba bona ba phetšego. Le, ke legae la ka, naga yaka. Ke phela mo, ke nnoši.

Mohau (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian New Zealander

Hi there, Sorry, I don't know anyone whose written Māori is good enough to write a Wikipedia article (well, I do, but they are computer-illiterate and would never get around to it!). I met Marton Csokas in 1987 when we were both at University - he was acting in a play by Sam Shepard, and I was the production manager. I might do some more copyediting on the article. dramatic (talk) 09:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand Television

Hi, I'm probably the wrong person to ask about New Zealand TV, since I watch less than an hour a week these days. Shortland street is the only ongoing drama series made in NZ - what other drama there is is usually short seasons. http://www.nzonscreen.com/watch/television gives a historical overview. The list of genres on the left is probably a pretty accurate overview of NZ TV production - 50% documentaries.

There is also www.tvnz.co.nz/video, but I'm not sure if that is viewable outside New Zealand. dramatic (talk) 06:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outrageous Fortune is considered one of the better local drama series. You should be able to watch excerpts at NZ on Screen-gadfium 19:21, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hi again, I have sent you a mail to your e-mail account. I would be grateful if you could check it and let me know what you think as soon as you can. Kind regards, --MacTire02 (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

She mish reesht! (Me again). I just thought you might like to know that I have completed your translation which is visible here. Kind regards, --MacTire02 (talk) 20:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I got it, I thank you. Do you still need any vote from me? :) Anyway, did my vote count? :) --Eino81 (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Miok

The article George Miok has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unfortunately this individual does not meet the general notability guideline and is known for only one event; Wikipedia is not a memorial

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:25, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Eino81. You have new messages at Leonard^Bloom's talk page.
Message added 00:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 00:48, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Eino81. You have new messages at Perspeculum's talk page.
Message added 13:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Perspeculum (talk) 13:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for adding onto the article Yatton, Ontario. And you other question regarding George Miok, I am on the fence with it there are a fair amount of references for the article but there is a problem with WP:BLP1E. You can contest the PROD and it will most likely be taken to an WP:AFD. If you do contest the PROD you remove it from the page and leave an edit summary about why you contested it. Kyle1278 16:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George Miok

Hi, I'm on the fence about this article as well. Here in Ontario, where Mr. Miok was repatriated, he received coverage until the honour guard brought his remains to the police morgue, in Toronto. He might be getting more coverage in his home town, but I don't think it is lingering the way some suggest. I do not automatically think this article should be deleted, but I will need some more convincing before I can support keeping the article.--Abebenjoe (talk) 01:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give it a look tomorrow, I have other projects that need attention, but I will also search the Ontario/Canadian/International media to see if he keeps emerging as a story. My suggestion is to post links on the talk page to the Hungarian media, and unilingual English speakers, like myself, can use Google translate to get the basic idea that is being conveyed. If he is, as you say, in the Hungarian media, then I'm inclined to keep the article, at least for notability issues. Have not really looked the article's prose, nor its citations. Take care it must be 0300 where you live.--Abebenjoe (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the video, although it seems to be a Canadian-Hungarian production, but I'll support keeping it. I have witnessed other news media relating to him, though his is a low importance general biography. In future, the Miok article might get merged into a larger article that deals with the incident that killed him, or Canada's participation in the Afghanistan war.--Abebenjoe (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of George Miok

I have nominated George Miok, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Miok. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WWGB (talk) 08:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Darvas_Ivan-A_tizedes_meg_a_tobbiek.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Darvas_Ivan-A_tizedes_meg_a_tobbiek.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:31, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huntington

The picture came from this book.

You can use the following citation:<ref name=bench>Colmer, Montagu, and Charles Erskine Scott Wood. 1910. [http://books.google.com/books?id=sykwAAAAYAAJ&ots=EHmiPYwrBw&dq=bench%20and%20bar%20of%20oregon&pg=PA158&ci=635%2C500%2C242%2C26&source=bookclip ''History of the Bench and Bar of Oregon''.] Portland, Or: Historical Pub. Co. p. 158.</ref>

Also, instead of using the Rootsweb source, you are better using the original. As to more info, the Bench and Bar article may contain more info, but likely not much more. The different sources on this page may also have some more, as well as Google News' archives or a search of Google Books. Note in the Republican League source he is listed as B. S. Huntington, so you may need to play with the search terms. Then if you want to do more looking, your local library may have some online databases for genealogy research you could access, with HeritageQuest a common one. Aboutmovies (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed up. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Images in you User Space

Hey there Eino81, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free images are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some images that I found on User:Eino81/George Miok. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page. See a log of images removed today here, shutoff the bot here and report errors here. Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Darvas Ivan-A tizedes meg a tobbiek.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Darvas Ivan-A tizedes meg a tobbiek.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 03:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bela S. Huntington

On February 14, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bela S. Huntington, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Zoltán Téglás

On February 20, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Zoltán Téglás, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Prize for Good Neighborhood and Understanding

The article Prize for Good Neighborhood and Understanding has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Award for Good Neighborhood and Understanding

I have nominated Award for Good Neighborhood and Understanding, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Award for Good Neighborhood and Understanding. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. RadioFan (talk) 20:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kérés

Meg szerettelek volna már kérni korábban is rá, újból a rajztehetségedet kívánom segítségül hívni. Szóval én a facebookon ismerkedek muravidékiekkel és sokszor osztunk meg fényképeket egymással. Felmerült az is válasszunk-e a régiónknak zászlót, de eddig még nem adott senki semmit. Én most szeretnék egy alternatívát adni, amelyben benne vannak a szláv nemzet színei és benne van a Muramente egy kedves állata (tulajdonképpen a jelképe), a gólya. Kicsit össze kell szednem mire gondolok. Az első ez volna. Ez egy horvát zászló, ez lenne viszont az alap, de fordítva nézzed (ne piros-fehér-kék, hanem kék-fehér-piros). Ez egy fordítottságot akar kifejezni, mert másképp volt a muravidékiek története századokig, mint a stájer-krajnai szlovénoké. A gólyához egy képet mindjárt keresek a commonsból. Doncsecz^talk 18:31, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Na a kedves kis gilicéről is van egy jó kép: http://hu.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=F%C3%A1jl:Ciconia_ciconia_juv_small.jpg&filetimestamp=20041113225425 De azt hiszem ez feketecsőrű gólya, inkább pirossal kellene rajzolni. Ennek kell lennie a közepén (a kék háttér nem kell bele), s belelóghat akár a kék és a piros sávba is. Az utolsót nehezen tudom elmagyarázni, egy aranyszínű kereszt lenne, ami négy el "L" formájú alakkal szegélyezné a gólyákat, de a végeig nyitottak. Valamelyik délszláv zászlónál láttam ezt a keresztet, de nem tudom hol. Lehet, hogy mintaként nem éppen arany színű keresztet fogok találni. Doncsecz^talk 18:36, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Valami olyasmi mint a norvég zászló lehet talán, a kék kereszt körül a fehér szegélyt nézd, de ez a kereszt nem érné el a zászló végeit, csak a közepén állna. Doncsecz^talk 18:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amúgy nem sürgős, ráér. Doncsecz^talk 19:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A kereszt, ami négy "L"-ből áll középen helyezkednek el, s a gólyát fogják közre. Hasonló igen mint az izlandi és a norvég zászló, de rövidek a szárai és nem érik el a szegélyeit a zászlónak. Doncsecz^talk 19:32, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Az a baj, hogy most csak a finn fasiszták szimbólumát találtam 1. Itt is látod hogy helyezkedik el a címer a keresztben. De az enyémnél nincs belül kitöltve a szín és a kereszt nem éri el a szegélyeket. Doncsecz^talk 19:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hallkan kívánok szólni arról, hogy amikor a múltkor adtál nekem egy példányt az írásodból, úgy most elárulom, hogy a virtus.hu-ra én is szeretnék egy irodalmi művet elhelyezni. Még nem végeztem vele ugyan, de remélem hamarosan fogok. Doncsecz^talk 19:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Írtam választ. Az én hibám is, hogy nem mondtam el konkrétabban, fészekkel és a két madárral kellett volna, s némileg kisebb mérettel egészen a középső részre. Doncsecz^talk 08:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ne, ahogy a képen állnak, nem kell igazodni úgy, ahogy a hagyományos címerkészítés csinálja. Láttam már effajta zászlókat valahol. És mondom kifejezetten jó, ha színes, ne csak fekete-fehér. (a gólya csőre legyen piros). Ja azt meg nem mondtam, hogy a zaszlo01 keresztje lenne az ideális, de persze rövidebb szárakkal. Doncsecz^talk 12:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias, Thank you very much, I translate Parvuz to nahuatl languages, if you need other translation contact me, please.--Marrovi (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

nah:Párvusz now is in Aztec language, thanks by translation.--Marrovi (talk) 02:57, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Arpadhon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Arpadhon.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. multichill (talk) 13:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Attila Kaszas.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Attila Kaszas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Párvusz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Párvusz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Párvusz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ironholds (talk) 10:30, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian help

Hey Eino81

I'm a contributer to wikipedia who has recently been working on the article Gloomy Sunday by Rezso Seress on the english wikipedia. Due to the large amount of false rumors that exist over this song in the English seeking world, I've recently been looking into finding some sources or references from the original Hungarian that might be more accurate to the songs backstory. As I can not read Hungarian, I have been as of late inquiring to some of the wikipedians in Hungary if they could perhaps offer any assistence or links to helpful sites that will assist in the articles backstory. If you could review the information in the article or offer any information or helpful references, then myself and all other wikipedians would be grateful to you for your effort. Sincerely: Trollyboy (talk) 02:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Lance Kinsey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Police Academy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabrina Javor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabrina Javor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Javor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:12, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Václav Marek (writer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sami, Ahoj and Lapland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Patriot Budapest roster

Template:Patriot Budapest roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eino81. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eino81. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eino81. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]