User talk:KH-1

Archive

Talk Archives

Three-revert rule on Jason Momoa

Please be aware that being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing, especially if you violate the three-revert rule. While there are exemptions (e.g., Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to Wikipedia's biographies of living persons (BLP) policy), you must clearly explain the exemption in the edit summary or in a separate section on the talk page. In general, it's best to report the issue (once, not three separate times) and allow other editors to handle further reverts.

Also, please do not accuse other editors of vandalism when it's a different issue such as unsourced or poorly sourced content. Vandalism has a very specific meaning here on Wikipedia and inaccurate accusations of vandalism unfortunately tend to provoke further disruption. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 03:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert changes on Dumka wiki page?

Sampurana Shiksha Kavach is a program launched by the district administration. You can dispute the external link to the district website but why remove the entire content? Shashanksinghal.iitkgp (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he/him · pending changes reviewer, rollbacker, 100314 edits since: 2014-07-17, last edit on 2024-06-14

I MADE A HUNDO THOUSIE EDITS AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS STUPID T-SHIRT!

jp×g 🗯️ 02:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/TFhost

Hi,

I was wondering what may have triggered your nomination of this Article for deletion. Would you kindly provide more insight other than listed, as the information in the article are well researched, historical and verifiable as well. NIRA is the number one authority as regards hosting and domain registration in Nigeria and awards given by them will equally be authoritative, authentic and verifiable.

Thanks for your kind considerations. 4555hhm (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Redshift page

I think you have twice removed an external link to a site which specializes in Amazon Redshift.

Why? 2A01:C23:5D64:5300:0:0:0:1003 (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This has happened again.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_can_normally_be_linked

> Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues,[d] amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons.

The reversions are on the face of it removing a link which is legitimate.

Please justify your reversion, or stop doing it.

2A01:C23:657C:7A00:0:0:0:1002 (talk) 07:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renz Nathaniel Cruz

I don't know if WP:RPPI is an option for AFD discussions, but I requested the page be protected. APK hi :-) (talk) 06:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sheriff U3 talk 22:26, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually at ANI and contains zero evidence that you have been edit warring. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:55, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this has been resolved. @Sherif U3, maybe next time do more reading instead of mudslinging.-KH-1 (talk) 05:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like your reasons for it, so that I may improve. (that is talking to my revert)

About the Edit Warring thing, I am sorry, I read a thing and thought that you broke the 3r rule.

I don't want to cause issue's, just want to help, and thought I saw a bad account.

I now have learned your reasons for a few things, and wanted to clear this up.

I would suggest though that you state your reasons for your reverts, it helps prevent things like this.

I am very sorry for everything, it was a misunderstanding on my part for the edit warring claim.

User Page Talk Contributions Sheriff U3 05:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cocoa article

Hi there yes i edited an article and there was nothing wrong with it I provided an accurate source, there was no reason for you to change it. Andrewworley048 (talk) 05:18, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]