Talk:Tain

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightst a llion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 08:27, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Requested Tain, Scotland moved to Tain, moving Tain to Tain (disambiguation) - The dabs are not important enough to stop the important modern town and medieval pilgrimage center of Tain getting a simple link. None of the three other articles on the current Tain page are actually properly referred to as Tain; even Táin Bó Cúailnge carries an acute accent on the a. Definite move. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 11:47, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, although a Tain dab page looks rather redundant. A mention of the constituency on the Tain page, and a dab message at the top for the "Táin Bó Cúailnge" seem like all that's needed. The album is not actually called "Tain", so why dab it ? Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:08, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Laurel Bush 12:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Support, also support per Angusmclellan. --Mais oui! 16:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Should be at Tain, Ross and Cromarty. Septentrionalis 18:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support on grounds that other Tain articles are lesser importance --JBellis 19:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Wrong location on map?

Looking at google maps, it looks like Tain is way off here. Google shows it to be in the extreme northeast, close to Wick. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.164.218.92 (talk) 22:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080529185220/http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/vli/language/gaelic/pdfs/placenamesP-Z.pdf to http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/vli/language/gaelic/pdfs/placenamesP-Z.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]